Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2011 | 04:19 AM
  #4441  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
It used to be said that ALPA was the reason for half of the dollars in your wallet -- the other half being what the company would willingly pay you if there were no union. But that was a long time ago.
I know that what you say is true.. it is because of a 'union' that we have the pay and benefits we do have... I have never touted going union free... as I have said many times.. and I am STILL waiting for a laundry list of reasons why the "national" alpa is indispensable. I'll settle for 5 good reasons.
Reply
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:14 AM
  #4442  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Clueless and incoherent logic. This model has only served to destroy jobs at the majors. ALPA representing both sides has only served to continue this model.
Typical Carl babbling.


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Unresponsive straw man response to an argument that nobody is making.
That is exactly the argument you made in your previous post, go read it.


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
No, the best way is for us to demand it back via collective bargaining. The regional pilots should raise their pay by collective bargaining paid for with their own dues...not the dues of Delta pilots.

Delta pilots represented by a union that is focused solely on Delta pilots. It's the ONLY way to go.

Not even you believe your own argument here.

Carl
Of course I don't believe it. I believe in strength through unity. I don't believe an army fights best when they break up into independent, self-centered units, I believe an army fights best with unity of purpose, mass, and coordination.

You believe that the massive reconfiguration in the industry in the last 10 years is all ALPA's fault. It just shows you have no knowledge of the industry, no economic background, and no analytical capabilities. Therefore, you don't understand the problem and you have no clue as to what the solution is. But keep babbling on as if you do know, you have been spectacularly unsuccessful in all your predictions, why stop now?
Reply
Old 02-21-2011 | 06:44 AM
  #4443  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Typical Carl babbling.




That is exactly the argument you made in your previous post, go read it.




Of course I don't believe it. I believe in strength through unity. I don't believe an army fights best when they break up into independent, self-centered units, I believe an army fights best with unity of purpose, mass, and coordination.

You believe that the massive reconfiguration in the industry in the last 10 years is all ALPA's fault. It just shows you have no knowledge of the industry, no economic background, and no analytical capabilities. Therefore, you don't understand the problem and you have no clue as to what the solution is. But keep babbling on as if you do know, you have been spectacularly unsuccessful in all your predictions, why stop now?
To be thought of this way by someone as absolutely incoherent as yourself, is a good thing.

Carl
Reply
Old 02-22-2011 | 03:18 PM
  #4444  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: 767
Default

Alfaromeo, Army Field Manual 1-1 discusses the Principles of Modern Warfare. They are:

Objective
Offensive
Economy of Force
Maneuver
Unity of Command
Mass
Security
Surprise
Simplicity

Choosing to ignore one of the principles does not mean failure or defeat, however choosing to ignore Economy of Force, Unity of Command, and Mass most certainly would not have people placing bets on your success. While the DPA success or failure is secondary, what we really want is success for the average Delta pilot. Why would we support an organization that chooses to organize in a manner so contradictory to principles rooted in several thousands of years conflict. Literally millions of people have died ignoring these principles. Does DPA think they can ignore them and escape unscathed?
Reply
Old 02-22-2011 | 05:14 PM
  #4445  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by clancy
Alfaromeo, Army Field Manual 1-1 discusses the Principles of Modern Warfare. They are:

Objective
Offensive
Economy of Force
Maneuver
Unity of Command
Mass
Security
Surprise
Simplicity

Choosing to ignore one of the principles does not mean failure or defeat, however choosing to ignore Economy of Force, Unity of Command, and Mass most certainly would not have people placing bets on your success. While the DPA success or failure is secondary, what we really want is success for the average Delta pilot. Why would we support an organization that chooses to organize in a manner so contradictory to principles rooted in several thousands of years conflict. Literally millions of people have died ignoring these principles. Does DPA think they can ignore them and escape unscathed?
Highest paid passenger pilots = SWA with small independent union
Highest paid cargo pilots...... = UPS with small independent union

Maybe you need to send them your Army Field Manual so they'll understand they need to join ALPA.

Carl
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 04:28 AM
  #4446  
Fins Up's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Passed out in my hammock
Default

Originally Posted by clancy
Alfaromeo, Army Field Manual 1-1 discusses the Principles of Modern Warfare. They are:

Objective
Offensive
Economy of Force
Maneuver
Unity of Command
Mass
Security
Surprise
Simplicity

Choosing to ignore one of the principles does not mean failure or defeat, however choosing to ignore Economy of Force, Unity of Command, and Mass most certainly would not have people placing bets on your success. While the DPA success or failure is secondary, what we really want is success for the average Delta pilot. Why would we support an organization that chooses to organize in a manner so contradictory to principles rooted in several thousands of years conflict. Literally millions of people have died ignoring these principles. Does DPA think they can ignore them and escape unscathed?
You keep all your JPME manuals on your nighstand don't you?
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 07:35 AM
  #4447  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,872
Likes: 189
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Highest paid passenger pilots = SWA with small independent union
Highest paid cargo pilots...... = UPS with small independent union

Maybe you need to send them your Army Field Manual so they'll understand they need to join ALPA.

Carl
And how did they get those rates? How did they compare to the industry when they achieved them?

Did the fact one company is huge with a giant non airline revenue base to support it have a effect?

Did the fact the other company made 5 billion dollars in hedging fuel oil have a effect?

Did either company file bankruptcy?

Did either company have to procure exit financing while in chapter 11?
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 07:59 AM
  #4448  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
And how did they get those rates? How did they compare to the industry when they achieved them?

Did the fact one company is huge with a giant non airline revenue base to support it have a effect?

Did the fact the other company made 5 billion dollars in hedging fuel oil have a effect?

Did either company file bankruptcy?

Did either company have to procure exit financing while in chapter 11?
Sailing, c'mon now. You know you can't use context (i.e. "the big picture") when trying to get a clear picture of events. Jeez.
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 01:11 PM
  #4449  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
And how did they get those rates? How did they compare to the industry when they achieved them?
I don't know how they did it...not paying attention to the Army Field Manual and all.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Did the fact one company is huge with a giant non airline revenue base to support it have a effect?
Clancy's Army Field Manual didn't discuss revenue's impact on warfare.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Did the fact the other company made 5 billion dollars in hedging fuel oil have a effect?
See above.

Carl
Reply
Old 02-23-2011 | 01:19 PM
  #4450  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
Sailing, c'mon now. You know you can't use context (i.e. "the big picture") when trying to get a clear picture of events. Jeez.
Yes, far more important to say things like "UPS and FDX are in an entirely different industry" and "SWA is a totally different business."

It cracks me up to see the contortions required for you guys to continue your belief that small independent unions cannot succeed. True believers are very hard to persuade.

Carl
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices