Virgin America Warning
#51
Oh, that's right, the MIT data that is based on US DOT Form 41 via BTS, Schedule P6 & P10 is biased and unfactual right? That is the argument that is always brought up by certain folks when presenting these facts. It was a Delta guy that "questioned" the source, just posting the facts. Unless of course you don't trust DOT data.
Well I can tell you just by glancing at it that it's way off. Heck, they've got a Hawaiian pilot making over $1.8 mil in 1999. Which they highlighted and said that the data appears questionable. If they are questioning their own data, then I'm not putting too much confidence in their chart. But hey, if you can look at the pay scales and believe that there is a $2300 average difference per year, then that kook-aid they're serving over there is much stronger than even I thought. I'm not in any way trying to get into a "my W2 is better than yours" debate, but c'mon man.....use your head.
#52
Oh, that's right, the MIT data that is based on US DOT Form 41 via BTS, Schedule P6 & P10 is biased and unfactual right? That is the argument that is always brought up by certain folks when presenting these facts. It was a Delta guy that "questioned" the source, just posting the facts. Unless of course you don't trust DOT data.
#53
#54
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Oh, that's right, the MIT data that is based on US DOT Form 41 via BTS, Schedule P6 & P10 is biased and unfactual right? That is the argument that is always brought up by certain folks when presenting these facts. It was a Delta guy that "questioned" the source, just posting the facts. Unless of course you don't trust DOT data.
I don't trust the data. It's poorly done, and very inaccurate. Case in point below.
#55
Had a VA guy on our jumpseat last week. In our discussion, I told him that like many pilots, my ideal job is SWA. He then responded "I don't think their pay rates are sustainable; someone is going to come along an undercut them."
I asked him, "aren't you that guy/airline, flying similar equipment for low rates on similar city pairs?". He seemed genuinely offended.
Am I not right? Or do you VA guys just think you're exempt from that classification?
Disclaimer: I've ridden VA and I like the product, and understand that most of you escaped regional jobs by going to VA. I respect that. I just hope that you guys aren't all delusional like this guy was. He seemed to see no problem with the pay rates and "agreement" you work under.
I asked him, "aren't you that guy/airline, flying similar equipment for low rates on similar city pairs?". He seemed genuinely offended.
Am I not right? Or do you VA guys just think you're exempt from that classification?
Disclaimer: I've ridden VA and I like the product, and understand that most of you escaped regional jobs by going to VA. I respect that. I just hope that you guys aren't all delusional like this guy was. He seemed to see no problem with the pay rates and "agreement" you work under.
#56
That just makes me wanna......oh...wait...never mind....it's time to go take another Septra DS as my uti is flaring up...thank goodness for the medication so I can continue to me a good boy!
#57
Banned
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Had a VA guy on our jumpseat last week. In our discussion, I told him that like many pilots, my ideal job is SWA. He then responded "I don't think their pay rates are sustainable; someone is going to come along an undercut them."
I asked him, "aren't you that guy/airline, flying similar equipment for low rates on similar city pairs?". He seemed genuinely offended.
Am I not right? Or do you VA guys just think you're exempt from that classification?
Disclaimer: I've ridden VA and I like the product, and understand that most of you escaped regional jobs by going to VA. I respect that. I just hope that you guys aren't all delusional like this guy was. He seemed to see no problem with the pay rates and "agreement" you work under.
I asked him, "aren't you that guy/airline, flying similar equipment for low rates on similar city pairs?". He seemed genuinely offended.
Am I not right? Or do you VA guys just think you're exempt from that classification?
Disclaimer: I've ridden VA and I like the product, and understand that most of you escaped regional jobs by going to VA. I respect that. I just hope that you guys aren't all delusional like this guy was. He seemed to see no problem with the pay rates and "agreement" you work under.
Just to let you know the majority of the VA pilots do not feel that way. Most of the pilots there are not from the regionals but furloughed from other airlines and if you fly on VA you will notice alot of ****ed off pilots right now. The wages and benefits were fine for the first few years but now it's time to pay the piper.
They want pay and benefits to be within industry standards. Starting next year December 13 th you will see a mas exudes of pilots from VA if things don't change. So don't look at most VA pilots as the one that made the comment.
People like fish are cluless by bashing the pilot groupe he shows by comments made he has not been with a ALPA airline that has shut down or furloughed. That is what a lot of the VA pilots are.
VA will be just another regional airline if it does not change and the pilot that gets hired will be fresh out of flight school.
#58
Banned
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
He then responded "I don't think their pay rates are sustainable; someone is going to come along an undercut them."
I asked him, "aren't you that guy/airline, flying similar equipment for low rates on similar city pairs?". He seemed genuinely offended.
Am I not right? Or do you VA guys just think you're exempt from that classification? He seemed to see no problem with the pay rates and "agreement" you work under.
I asked him, "aren't you that guy/airline, flying similar equipment for low rates on similar city pairs?". He seemed genuinely offended.
Am I not right? Or do you VA guys just think you're exempt from that classification? He seemed to see no problem with the pay rates and "agreement" you work under.
The wages and benefits were fine for the first few years but now it's time to pay the piper.
They want pay and benefits to be within industry standards. Starting next year December 13 th you will see a mas exudes of pilots from VA if things don't change. So don't look at most VA pilots as the one that made the comment.
They want pay and benefits to be within industry standards. Starting next year December 13 th you will see a mas exudes of pilots from VA if things don't change. So don't look at most VA pilots as the one that made the comment.
***
Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 12-29-2011 at 04:33 PM. Reason: TOS, Flamebaiting
#59
The wages and benefits were fine for the first few years but now it's time to pay the piper.
They want pay and benefits to be within industry standards.
They want pay and benefits to be within industry standards.
I agree that airlines in the US should start paying industry standard wages, but the average wage of pilots working for all other industrialized, "first world" nations is what we should be aming for and not the average pay of the lowest paid pilots of all other first world countries.
#60
Banned
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
I find it disturbing that an international organization that manages airlines all over the planet comes to the US and offers the lowest pay and benefits of all the airlines under their brand and people find this to be OK!
I agree that airlines in the US should start paying industry standard wages, but the average wage of pilots working for all other industrialized, "first world" nations is what we should be aming for and not the average pay of the lowest paid pilots of all other first world countries.
I agree that airlines in the US should start paying industry standard wages, but the average wage of pilots working for all other industrialized, "first world" nations is what we should be aming for and not the average pay of the lowest paid pilots of all other first world countries.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



