Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
CVG roadshow notes and observations >

CVG roadshow notes and observations

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

CVG roadshow notes and observations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2012 | 05:45 PM
  #61  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by CVG767A
The pilot in me prefers to hope for the best case, but assume the worst case.
And this is exactly why we're getting steamrolled.

No risk...no reward.
Old 05-31-2012 | 05:50 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
I don't agree with you, we'd have 311+255 = 566 RJ's flying outsourced.

This agreement makes that number 450. 111 jets worth of block hours is a significant difference.

It would take until 2020 until that 450 is reached without our consent... DAL pilots could be on their 2nd or 3rd PWA negotiation by that point....

We always try to improve the pay, and we have restricted outsourcing from the JPWA up to now, why wouldn't we tighten the DCI noose 2 or 3 more times also?

I am with you WRT trust of mgt. and their intentions.
Unless you feel they would renew a lease on an unwanted jet then there will be 366 RJs left at the end of 2020 without this TA. Less total and less large ones compared to this TA. If you feel that Delta would rather spend the millions on heavy maintenance of a 50 seater, then your numbers are more appropriate.
Old 05-31-2012 | 07:21 PM
  #63  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Default

Originally Posted by DLpilot
Unless you feel they would renew a lease on an unwanted jet then there will be 366 RJs left at the end of 2020 without this TA. Less total and less large ones compared to this TA. If you feel that Delta would rather spend the millions on heavy maintenance of a 50 seater, then your numbers are more appropriate.
Through 2015, 331 50 seaters are on the hook with lease contracts, and those don't help with profits. With the TA, that number drops to 125 by 2015. The additional 76 seaters are brought in ONLY when 717s are brought in. So, that means 80 fewer RJs flying around. That is significant. Please attend a roadshow.
Old 05-31-2012 | 08:29 PM
  #64  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
The idea of a union is that our Reps speak on our collective behalf.
Does speaking on our collective behalf involve selling a sub par agreement to its membership?
Old 05-31-2012 | 08:30 PM
  #65  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Through 2015, 331 50 seaters are on the hook with lease contracts, and those don't help with profits. With the TA, that number drops to 125 by 2015. The additional 76 seaters are brought in ONLY when 717s are brought in. So, that means 80 fewer RJs flying around. That is significant. Please attend a roadshow.
311 in 2015.

Oh, and there are less than 100 70 seaters and in the 140's of 76 seaters committed to in 2015, too.

Did you miss that one?

This agreement increases the long term viability of DCI for short term gains. We are long term employees and need to think in those terms.
Old 05-31-2012 | 08:43 PM
  #66  
Jack Bauer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Does speaking on our collective behalf involve selling a sub par agreement to its membership?
You have to give credit to some of the historians here who predicted:

1. The union would keep the membership in the dark.

2. The union would not follow the direction given to it by its constituents.

3. The union would sell the he11 out of whatever they came up with.

Same old song and dance....

Old 05-31-2012 | 08:45 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
From: B737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Through 2015, 331 50 seaters are on the hook with lease contracts, and those don't help with profits.
Good, I say!

Protip: You do not want to make things that can replace you profitable. This T/A does exactly that.
Old 06-01-2012 | 04:58 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Through 2015, 331 50 seaters are on the hook with lease contracts, and those don't help with profits. With the TA, that number drops to 125 by 2015. The additional 76 seaters are brought in ONLY when 717s are brought in. So, that means 80 fewer RJs flying around. That is significant. Please attend a roadshow.
Since when is scope about helping with profits? Scope=jobs
What is more detrimental to your job? What can your flying be more easily be replaced by? A 50 seater or a large RJ.
Old 06-01-2012 | 05:45 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: No to large RJs
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus
Good, I say!

Protip: You do not want to make things that can replace you profitable. This T/A does exactly that.
THIS!

Originally Posted by DLpilot
Since when is scope about helping with profits? Scope=jobs
What is more detrimental to your job? What can your flying be more easily be replaced by? A 50 seater or a large RJ.
THIS!

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp

This agreement increases the long term viability of DCI for short term gains. We are long term employees and need to think in those terms.
AND THIS!

It really boils down to these statements. THX for putting it so simply.
Old 06-01-2012 | 05:51 AM
  #70  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by DLpilot
Since when is scope about helping with profits? Scope=jobs
What is more detrimental to your job? What can your flying be more easily be replaced by? A 50 seater or a large RJ.
What is more detrimental to your job:

598 outsourced airframes with unlimited numbers of large TP's and 50 seat aircraft allowed?

OR

A fixed cap of airframes that will be reduced everytime new mainline 319/717's show up? It will very likely be 450 airframes.

Remember, come 2015 when this TA is up for renegotiation roughly 96 of the 102 70 seat jets will be on the end of its financial commitment between the beginning of 2015 and the end of 2019.

Additionally about 27 76's will be coming off of obligations in that same timeframe.

That is another opportunity to reduce the DCI cap to a number as low as 327 total airframes in a third round of scope recapture...

I see that as perfect timing for Delta Pilots to lower the cap and increase the ratios even more in mainline's favor!

Maybe they ARE looking at the long term........

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices