Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

It's so simple

Old 06-18-2012 | 05:21 PM
  #141  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 10
From: metal tube operator
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
We are trying to sell our "car" to DAL management... If we price it too high they will walk.
DAL mgmt: If you're reading this, we salute you. You have successfully managed to brainwash another DAL mainline pilot into thinking they're working for DELTA AIR LINES, now forever deserve to be paid industry average, providing industry leading sacrifices.
Old 06-18-2012 | 05:30 PM
  #142  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

There are so many derogatory nicknames for Chatauqua (sp?), I assume because it is an odd-ish name in its own right (and not because it is a particularly bad outfit), but could we come up with a standardized derogatory nickname for them instead of the seemingly hundreds floating around.

IMO this is more important than posturing on the TA at this point.
Old 06-18-2012 | 05:32 PM
  #143  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
There are so many derogatory nicknames for Chatauqua (sp?), I assume because it is an odd-ish name in its own right (and not because it is a particularly bad outfit), but could we come up with a standardized derogatory nickname for them instead of the seemingly hundreds floating around.

IMO this is more important than posturing on the TA at this point.
I, 80 knots of CLMP origin, propose that "Shaniqua" be the official nickname of Chatauqua airlines, a shell operator of Republic Airlines holdings and forever carved out and exempt of scope violations in our TA's section 1.
Old 06-18-2012 | 05:42 PM
  #144  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by padre2992
FTB, according to my rep, at the meeting Linda Puchala attended, she said that many pilot groups thought they were operating from a position of strength because of the inertia of congress and their apparent inability to act decisively. She said, put that thought out of your head. Legislation putting Delta pilots back to work has already been written and is waiting to put us back to work in the event the NMB path takes us that far.

That is not to say we can't effectively reduce revenue to the extent that it becomes cheaper for the company to pay us v. accept the reduced revenue and reduced profit on that revenue.

Bottom line, it isn't about striking. It is about controlling revenue.
That is patently untrue. My DTW reps were also there and NOTHING even close to that was stated by the NMB. Nothing. But thanks for the continued parroting of a management wish.

Carl
Old 06-18-2012 | 05:50 PM
  #145  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by padre2992
FTB, according to my rep, at the meeting Linda Puchala attended, she said that many pilot groups thought they were operating from a position of strength because of the inertia of congress and their apparent inability to act decisively. She said, put that thought out of your head. Legislation putting Delta pilots back to work has already been written and is waiting to put us back to work in the event the NMB path takes us that far.

That is not to say we can't effectively reduce revenue to the extent that it becomes cheaper for the company to pay us v. accept the reduced revenue and reduced profit on that revenue.

Bottom line, it isn't about striking. It is about controlling revenue.
Padre, why would they have the language written if we're far from the amendable date much less from mediation, arbitration, cooliation, PEBiation, but not stagnation? Do you think the rep was dropping the fud card?
Old 06-18-2012 | 06:05 PM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
First of all, NWA pilots did NOT bring 2 Captains over 12 hours to the joint contract. That was DAL.
Did NW fly >12 hour flights with 2 Captains prior to the merger? Did NW used to have Orient in the name because their very roots are in the Pacific where most 12+ hours flights are required? Was DL's presence in the Pacific negligible prior to the merger?
Originally Posted by johnso29
And I'm really starting to think you aren't even a UAL pilot. You really didn't know your managements offer was Delta RATES + $1?
You are as wrong about this as most things in your 9,000 I'll-informed posts. Tell your buddy to get a copy of the ltr. from CAL mgmnt regarding their DAL + $1 offer. In it they include caveats regarding implementation issues with many of the DAL PWA work rules et al.

It is amazing to realize that someone who is so ill-informed feels they have so much people need to hear on such a forum, but then again you're a pilot and a "Professional" at that.
Old 06-18-2012 | 06:12 PM
  #147  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
Did NW fly >12 hour flights with 2 Captains prior to the merger? Did NW used to have Orient in the name because their very roots are in the Pacific where most 12+ hours flights are required? Was DL's presence in the Pacific negligible prior to the merger?
Cut the attitude and the personal attacks.


NW's post bankruptcy contract only required 1 captain and 3 FOs for flights over 12 hours. They were still configuring their staffing for that, though. That changeover stopped with the DL merger and going to our staffing methods (2 CA's and 2 FO's for over 12).

Pre-merger, DL flew to NRT, PVG, and ICN.

NW had a negligible presence in Central America, South America, and Africa (also only flew to a handful of European cities) pre-merger... what's your point? The merger completed the route network of both carriers, and now it is paying off greatly.
Old 06-18-2012 | 06:21 PM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Cut the attitude and the personal attacks.
I don't remember a similar admonition for your buddy so I will take this one for what it is worth.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
NW's post bankruptcy contract only required 1 captain and 3 FOs for flights over 12 hours. They were still configuring their staffing for that, though. That changeover stopped with the DL merger and going to our staffing methods (2 CA's and 2 FO's for over 12).

Pre-merger, DL flew to NRT, PVG, and ICN.
Thanks for the confirmation.
Old 06-18-2012 | 06:28 PM
  #149  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=padre2992;1214671]. Legislation putting Delta pilots back to work has already been written and is waiting to put us back to work in the event the NMB path takes us that far.

QUOTE]

Chances of that being a true statement probably approach zero.

That said, so what if true, Congress is just about as dysfunctional as it gets, just like some other organizations I can think of.
Old 06-18-2012 | 06:41 PM
  #150  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
Did NW fly >12 hour flights with 2 Captains prior to the merger? Did NW used to have Orient in the name because their very roots are in the Pacific where most 12+ hours flights are required? Was DL's presence in the Pacific negligible prior to the merger? You are as wrong about this as most things in your 9,000 I'll-informed posts. Tell your buddy to get a copy of the ltr. from CAL mgmnt regarding their DAL + $1 offer. In it they include caveats regarding implementation issues with many of the DAL PWA work rules et al.
What's amazing is you state you don't care, but you keep coming back. I'll tell ya what. Since you're a UAL pilot, YOU post a copy of the agreement on here. You prove me wrong. I already posted a quote from a Continental pilot disproving your claim. So show me I'm wrong. I'll glady eat crow if I am.

Plus, I highly doubt you've read all 9000 of my posts. You probably should though. You might actually learn something.

Originally Posted by Flytolive
It is amazing to realize that someone who is so ill-informed feels they have so much people need to hear on such a forum, but then again you're a pilot and a "Professional" at that.
It's funny how you call me ill informed. You've been proven wrong multiple times but you can't admit it. You come on our TA forum and chastise anyone who disagrees with you. You call yourself a true unionist, but you're willing to toss your fellow ALPA brothers and sisters flying those 70 seat RJs out on the street.

Last edited by johnso29; 06-18-2012 at 06:56 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DYNASTY HVY
Money Talk
0
10-15-2008 05:15 AM
pig on the wing
Cargo
27
10-11-2008 03:02 PM
Tech Maven
Pilot Health
6
08-12-2007 09:33 PM
skypine27
Cargo
5
08-09-2007 10:06 AM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
0
02-21-2006 10:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices