Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Would AA's lower 1st year pay keep you away? >

Would AA's lower 1st year pay keep you away?


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC
View Poll Results: Would AA's lower 1st yr pay keep you away?
Yes, I'd go to DL/UA before AA to make more my first year
73
42.94%
No, all 3 airlines are now close enough in careers that it wouldn't matter
97
57.06%
Voters: 170. You may not vote on this poll

Would AA's lower 1st year pay keep you away?

Old 11-17-2013 | 12:00 AM
  #41  
ghilis101's Avatar
La Familia Delta
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
From: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
Huh? In 2011 everyone was talking about AA filing BK some time in 2012. They just disagreed when. The majority didn't believe AA would enter 2013 without filing BK.

Too much to discuss in one post, but one of the reasons AA cited for BK was labor costs. We all know that AA pilots weren't breaking the bank, the fraction of operating expenses that labor actually accounted for wasn't a factor. Additionally, "pensions" aka the A fund was funded at the time and not really the burden they made it out to be, hence the reason it wasn't dissolved in BK court.

Honestly, you really think AA needed to file BK then but not in the few years post 9/11? They weathered the storm in the early 2000's but not 2011-2012? Its clear the BK was a move to shed obligations and position themselves to be competitive with DAL and UAL/CAL. Call it "BK Envy" if you will...
Reply
Old 11-17-2013 | 01:44 AM
  #42  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 62
Default

Or another way to look at it is the aa employees voted in ch11 pay/contracts in 2003 which put added pressure on NWA and DAL in particular. Part of that was the pipe dream of possibly running UAL and USair out of business, and the other the fear of ch11 sold by the company and specifically the apa chairman. Just sayin...


Originally Posted by ghilis101
Too much to discuss in one post, but one of the reasons AA cited for BK was labor costs. We all know that AA pilots weren't breaking the bank, the fraction of operating expenses that labor actually accounted for wasn't a factor. Additionally, "pensions" aka the A fund was funded at the time and not really the burden they made it out to be, hence the reason it wasn't dissolved in BK court.

Honestly, you really think AA needed to file BK then but not in the few years post 9/11? They weathered the storm in the early 2000's but not 2011-2012? Its clear the BK was a move to shed obligations and position themselves to be competitive with DAL and UAL/CAL. Call it "BK Envy" if you will...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
CAL EWR
United
44
11-26-2012 01:29 PM
ShyGuy
Regional
412
06-05-2011 02:16 PM
B1900YX
Regional
212
06-28-2009 08:55 AM
AAflyer
Major
42
05-13-2007 05:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices