Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Allegiant's response? Concessions! >

Allegiant's response? Concessions!

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Allegiant's response? Concessions!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2014, 04:15 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 519
Default

Originally Posted by Thunderpig View Post
Other than the captains that seem to have no problem with this as they only have a few more years to fly, I have only run into a few people who do this on a semi-regular basis. That being said, I recently heard a point about it for the first time. When mission modes aren't being picked up, the company is paying someone else to do the flying, outside the company, costing our pilots money and not really effecting the company. For those that are in the know, where does this fall into the reasoning of "STFD"? I am not on the email list for this stuff as I was told early on why we don't want people picking it up and I haven't even been approached by anyone in the union for anything, ergo no union emails either.

Is this policy working? Pilot group unity is obviously of great importance...are we making the case, particularly given the rapid expansion of new-hires?
Are you saying that you are not on the union email list and do not get any correspondence from them? If so, please PM me your info and I will see that you are added. With the coming events, it is critical that every pilot receive communication from their union. If you're saying that you haven't gotten any official direction as to whether or not to pick up MM, it's because the union can't tell you not to do it. It would loosely fall under the umbrella of a job action and that is not allowed at this stage in the game. As far as the newhires getting the info, we are telling them at the meet and greets and I'm sure captains are also educating them as they hit the line.

As far as outsourcing, it's almost always more expensive than doing it in-house. If it weren't, they would have outsourced EVERYTHING and you would see Falcon Air and Sun Country in a middle of a hiring spree right now.

The pilot group is not fundamentally against MM in itself. We're against the constant supply-and-demand fluctuation in compensation for these MM depending upon how badly they need the flight covered. In the course of a week, I've seen trips range from just straight block to double block with a comp day. There needs to be a hard-and-fast rule for compensation for MM. I think 8 hrs or double block (which ever is higher) plus a comp day is fair (my opinion only). The company has been approached by our negotiating team regarding adding an MOU to the current work rules regarding this compensation and like 100% of the other times we approached them, they told us to pound sand. We're not dealing with normal people here.
CLMP is offline  
Old 10-26-2014, 07:00 PM
  #32  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by Xbone View Post
In regards to pay by manipulated accounting practices, better to destroy G4 outright than have a management team successfully re-define pilot pay in this regard.
Agree 100%. Well said.
Packrat is offline  
Old 10-26-2014, 07:08 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by CLMP View Post
...it is critical that every pilot receive communication from their union. If you're saying that you haven't gotten any official direction as to whether or not to pick up MM, it's because the union can't tell you not to do it. It would loosely fall under the umbrella of a job action...
Actually it would be a real job action. And it would cost you. When AA did it, it cost the Allied Pilots Association $45M in fines.

Delta got away with it, but they got the word out by word of mouth. The difference was that the court subpoenaed APA electronic records and found evidence on the hard drives.

When Delta management accused DALPA of doing the same thing, there was no hard evidence and the pilots argued successfully that there was no requirement for pilots to pick up overtime flying since it was technically voluntary.
Packrat is offline  
Old 10-26-2014, 09:54 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
Default

That pay band system can go to hell. I want to put my dentist on a pay band system. Dude charged me 800 dollars for a crown, *** over. I don’t think his accountant cared to hear I wasn’t having as profitable a year needed to justify his cost. The price was the price. I paid.
Xbone is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 02:27 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
Actually it would be a real job action. And it would cost you. When AA did it, it cost the Allied Pilots Association $45M in fines.

Delta got away with it, but they got the word out by word of mouth. The difference was that the court subpoenaed APA electronic records and found evidence on the hard drives.

When Delta management accused DALPA of doing the same thing, there was no hard evidence and the pilots argued successfully that there was no requirement for pilots to pick up overtime flying since it was technically voluntary.

All of the above regarding Delta is incorrect. The judge issued a injunction against DALPA requiring a immediate return to normal levels of overtime flying. He stated the union had a duty to control the membership while acknowledging this was a grass roots effort. That court order remains in force today.
In addition 49 pilots were individually sued for 1 million dollars each by Delta for encouraging the no overtime campaign via electronic mediums. The union was able to negotiate dropping the law suits as part of contract 01.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 03:45 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Thunderpig's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Retired Mil...ready to start the grind
Posts: 249
Default

Originally Posted by CLMP View Post
Are you saying that you are not on the union email list and do not get any correspondence from them? If so, please PM me your info and I will see that you are added. With the coming events, it is critical that every pilot receive communication from their union. If you're saying that you haven't gotten any official direction as to whether or not to pick up MM, it's because the union can't tell you not to do it. It would loosely fall under the umbrella of a job action and that is not allowed at this stage in the game. As far as the newhires getting the info, we are telling them at the meet and greets and I'm sure captains are also educating them as they hit the line.

As far as outsourcing, it's almost always more expensive than doing it in-house. If it weren't, they would have outsourced EVERYTHING and you would see Falcon Air and Sun Country in a middle of a hiring spree right now.

The pilot group is not fundamentally against MM in itself. We're against the constant supply-and-demand fluctuation in compensation for these MM depending upon how badly they need the flight covered. In the course of a week, I've seen trips range from just straight block to double block with a comp day. There needs to be a hard-and-fast rule for compensation for MM. I think 8 hrs or double block (which ever is higher) plus a comp day is fair (my opinion only). The company has been approached by our negotiating team regarding adding an MOU to the current work rules regarding this compensation and like 100% of the other times we approached them, they told us to pound sand. We're not dealing with normal people here.
I am unsure just how many from my class have actually gotten to sit down and talk to anyone from the union meet and greets, mainly due to not knowing about them until too late. Also, not sure how many of us are getting emails (I am not), so all my info is WOM. Whilst TDY and on IOE, I heard plenty about it, but then when hitting the line, I saw a mixed reaction in terms of avoiding MM. I never put my name on the list to get notifications for MM, so I don't get tempted as it was explained clearly by a few people that MM was bad.

Now that I am on the line in base, I am seeing something different, which is why I am asking the question. All of the new hire guys are hurting in the short-term by not picking it up, but understand the long-term gains desired by avoiding it. Hence the question...is it working...
Thunderpig is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 05:00 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 390
Default

Originally Posted by Thunderpig View Post
I am unsure just how many from my class have actually gotten to sit down and talk to anyone from the union meet and greets, mainly due to not knowing about them until too late. Also, not sure how many of us are getting emails (I am not), so all my info is WOM. Whilst TDY and on IOE, I heard plenty about it, but then when hitting the line, I saw a mixed reaction in terms of avoiding MM. I never put my name on the list to get notifications for MM, so I don't get tempted as it was explained clearly by a few people that MM was bad.

Now that I am on the line in base, I am seeing something different, which is why I am asking the question. All of the new hire guys are hurting in the short-term by not picking it up, but understand the long-term gains desired by avoiding it. Hence the question...is it working...
Have you reached out to a union rep to get on the mailing list? Are they ignoring your efforts?

I know the Vegas guys make every effort to attend all the classes, but from what you're saying, one appears to have been missed. It happens. With their schedules, I'm surprised they're able to get to any, but as they say, union membership is not a spectator sport, seek and ye shall find. I'm not sure who the point of contact is, but PM me and I'll get you a name.
tyler durden is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 05:55 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 519
Default

Thunderpig, if you were in the May class, I have just been given everyone's email addresses so you will be included. If not, please PM your info.
CLMP is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 06:23 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Thunderpig's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Retired Mil...ready to start the grind
Posts: 249
Default

Originally Posted by CLMP View Post
Thunderpig, if you were in the May class, I have just been given everyone's email addresses so you will be included. If not, please PM your info.
Gracias...I was indeed in the May class.
Thunderpig is offline  
Old 10-28-2014, 01:29 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
seattlepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 790
Default

Originally Posted by Xbone View Post
IMO, it's actually better for our side they just continue not bargaining. It wont be long before we make our case to the NMB for an impasse to be declared. We’re not a regional, and we’re bottom in every category for our segment of the industry.
I wouldn't bet on that. Toonsters went around the local here in RAH and produced a very bad TA. Now that we are negotiating with the company the ALD decided to sue the local.. Yeah, they are good like that.
seattlepilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ClutchCargo
Military
12
08-28-2017 01:47 PM
ERJ135
Regional
12
09-21-2013 08:39 AM
BD100
Regional
38
08-01-2013 10:30 PM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM
junglebob
Technical
4
04-17-2007 10:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices