Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Deny NAI failed, given final approval by DOT >

Deny NAI failed, given final approval by DOT

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Deny NAI failed, given final approval by DOT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2016 | 06:16 AM
  #41  
Mugatu's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 515
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
It's called capitalism. Markets set the rate. Unions artificially inflate our wages at the major level. Look at Emirates pay, that's a pretty good judge of what market rates are. Emirates CAs make around $140k-$150k/yr on their widebodies and that is a fairly established airline, not an upstart like NAS/NAI.

I know the truth hurts but at some point we are going to have to face reality. We've been working in an environment with little outside competition unlike the rest of the citizenship. Yes, things will get worse in the future. Just take advantage of the money you are earning now and invest wisely.

I am a little upset as I've worked many years, and struggled with low pay for many years as well, to get to where I am today to "finally" start making decent money. It is what it is. You deal the hand you were dealt. Honestly I think going to SWA, jetBlue or Spirit is actually a better career choice long term than the big 3. They will grow, their brands are strong. The big 3 will most likely shrink over time, their larger legacy cost structure and management culture slowly suffocating them.

Norwegian offers a good, solid product, on new aircraft, for a good price. They are highly rated on customer review sites unlike AA, DAL, and UA. There is a reason people continue to purchase on them, and not us.
There's no such thing as pure capitalism. Unions exist so labor is paid their economic worth. Emirates crew members are not being paid their economic worth. They pay just enough for people to show up and live in the sand pit, but they usually don't stay long.
Reply
Old 12-03-2016 | 06:52 AM
  #42  
deltajuliet's Avatar
Living the Dream
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

Is HR 5090 still in play? Congress hasn't done much with it in half a year, but could it reverse the decision if passed?
Reply
Old 12-03-2016 | 06:55 AM
  #43  
NEDude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MiLa
Honest question for those who know more about this than I.... I get that the problem that people are seeing with NAI is basing in Ireland to be able to use labor laws that are more beneficial to them. But what about Irish carriers such as Aerlingus? How does the Open Skies agreement apply to them, or why is nobody upset about them flying to the US? I personally would love anything that's going to help sustain a successful career at the legacy I work for but just am trying to see what the argument would have been for the DOJ to deny the application.
There was no legal grounds to deny the certificate, which is why they finally granted it. They prolonged the approval as long as they could, until the EU finally exercised their right to independent arbitration as allowed for in the treaty. When the DOT realised they would lose, they relented.
Reply
Old 12-03-2016 | 07:03 AM
  #44  
Dragon7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: Pressing On
Default

Super move there ALPA on endorsing Hilliary.
Reply
Old 12-03-2016 | 07:19 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Default

Originally Posted by NEDude

There was no legal grounds to deny the certificate, which is why they finally granted it. They prolonged the approval as long as they could.
Hogwash. Pure and utter BS.

This (above) from the guy who called the auto industry's bailout "the Obama auto bailout".

And...."there was no legal grounds"?? I hate grammar smack, but give me a break!
Reply
Old 12-03-2016 | 07:19 AM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 303
Likes: 1
From: 1Durrty5
Default

Originally Posted by Dragon7
Super move there ALPA on endorsing Hilliary.
When did ALPA endorse Hillary?

If ALPA did, please provide the letter/press release endorsing her.

I know the United MEC did, but I dont recall an endorsement from National.
Reply
Old 12-03-2016 | 07:22 AM
  #47  
silver fleet's Avatar
Sitting and scratching...
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Upright
Default

Great; 9/11, age 65, financial meltdown, equated to the "lost decade". Just when you think things are looking up, we get this ** sandwich....

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 12-03-2016 at 07:42 AM. Reason: TOU
Reply
Old 12-03-2016 | 07:26 AM
  #48  
NEDude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
Hogwash. Pure and utter BS.

This (above) from the guy who called the auto industry's bailout "the Obama auto bailout".

And...."there was no legal grounds"?? I hate grammar smack, but give me a break!
What were the legal grounds? Seriously, please cite them.

Regarding the auto bailout, Obama deserves as much credit for that as you conservatives blame Clinton for NAFTA. You cannot have it both ways, either place blame for NAFTA on Bush and the Republicans, or give Obama all the credit for the auto bailouts. Take your pick, you don't get a free pass at a double standard.
Reply
Old 12-03-2016 | 08:02 AM
  #49  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default

It was a perfect opportunity for one of those Executive Orders. That would have delayed NAI until the new Administration and Congress could bury it.
Reply
Old 12-03-2016 | 08:37 AM
  #50  
NEDude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
It was a perfect opportunity for one of those Executive Orders. That would have delayed NAI until the new Administration and Congress could bury it.
So what do you think the outcome would have been? The EU exercised their rights under the treaty to appeal to arbitration. Even the DOT realised they would most likely lose the arbitration. Does the US blatantly violate the Open Skies treaty by ignoring the decision of the arbitrator? What would be the EU reaction, do they start revoking the privileges of US carriers? Do they declare the the treaty null and void and revoke all of the slots at places like Heathrow that were a huge boon to the US carriers? Who benefits from that?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PilotGR
United
40
04-18-2016 01:20 PM
jdt30
United
60
12-09-2014 11:15 PM
Starcheck102
Major
9
08-21-2014 05:44 AM
Flyby1206
Major
2
05-19-2007 03:26 AM
BEWELCH
Flight Schools and Training
43
03-21-2007 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices