Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
can NWA be saved if merger dies? >

can NWA be saved if merger dies?

Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

can NWA be saved if merger dies?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2008, 10:28 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 40
Default can NWA be saved if merger dies?

i see that anti-trust hearings on this merger are set to start. if the merger is not consumated does anyone think that NWA will survive alone? if not, who would get what? i suspect AA would love NWA's pacific ops.
konadog is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 10:32 AM
  #2  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by konadog View Post
i see that anti-trust hearings on this merger are set to start. if the merger is not consumated does anyone think that NWA will survive alone? if not, who would get what? i suspect AA would love NWA's pacific ops.
thats funny, nwa has a better balance sheet then most of the other major carriers.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 10:49 AM
  #3  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by konadog View Post
i see that anti-trust hearings on this merger are set to start. if the merger is not consumated does anyone think that NWA will survive alone? if not, who would get what? i suspect AA would love NWA's pacific ops.

I don't think AA has the ability to buy anything right now. They might wanna worry about their domestic fleet, as well as saving themselves.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 11:01 AM
  #4  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
I don't think AA has the ability to buy anything right now. They might wanna worry about their domestic fleet, as well as saving themselves.

You are correct sir!
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 11:01 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 72
Default

Bored in the crashpad, Kona?
Pitts S2B is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 11:03 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by konadog View Post
i see that anti-trust hearings on this merger are set to start. if the merger is not consumated does anyone think that NWA will survive alone? if not, who would get what? i suspect AA would love NWA's pacific ops.
Dude,

Before you post do some research. See the above two post to start with.
newKnow is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 11:11 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 40
Default

wow, personal attacks. billions in losses this quarter (yes, you can argue accounting and how its registered) ands just getting out of ch 11 and the oldest, most fuel inefficient airplanes not in a third world country. it would be naiive to not question long term survival. i do believe AA is in much better shape than both NWA and DAL in in a position to purchase what they want when the opportunity arises.
konadog is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 11:35 AM
  #8  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by konadog View Post
wow, personal attacks. billions in losses this quarter (yes, you can argue accounting and how its registered) ands just getting out of ch 11 and the oldest, most fuel inefficient airplanes not in a third world country. it would be naiive to not question long term survival. i do believe AA is in much better shape than both NWA and DAL in in a position to purchase what they want when the opportunity arises.

Kinda the pot calling the kettle black, heh? I don't think any of the airlines are in good shape. And what are talking about with the fleet? AA has over 300 highly inefficient MD-80s as the staple of their domestic fleet. Far higher number than the -9s at NWA. Not the mention the 767s, A300s, and the millions lost that the -80s caused.

In this difficult time for all of us you might wanna think about throwing stones in a glass house.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 12:51 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by konadog View Post
wow, personal attacks. billions in losses this quarter (yes, you can argue accounting and how its registered) ands just getting out of ch 11 and the oldest, most fuel inefficient airplanes not in a third world country. it would be naiive to not question long term survival. i do believe AA is in much better shape than both NWA and DAL in in a position to purchase what they want when the opportunity arises.
Wrong. AA is in a worse financial position than NWA. Measured by cash on hand as a multiple of monthly expenses NWA is (or was) second behind B6. AA is 4th but in no position to buy anything. See threads above that pre-suppose that AMR might have to file for bankrupcy.

NWA has $3 billion on cash right now. (maybe $2.8 million after the quarter). From what I understand, the $4 billion and $6 billion loss that NWA and DAL posted was largely accounting for loss of value to the stock, not from operating the airline.


No personal attack, but just expect that whenever you propose chopping up someones airline or question its long term survival, expect to have their employees push back hard. Who do you work for so we can make something up for you.....

New K Now
newKnow is offline  
Old 04-24-2008, 01:40 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 39
Default

i see USAIRWAYS in your future......
nwa757dtw is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoomie
Mergers and Acquisitions
6
02-26-2008 01:03 PM
mike734
Major
15
09-17-2007 12:03 PM
LDmax
Major
0
01-28-2006 12:57 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
RockBottom
Major
1
08-12-2005 03:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices