Search

Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

SLI compromises

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2008 | 07:05 PM
  #61  
Cogf16's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: VEOP Retired! 7ER A was last position
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
I was recently challenged by a DAL guy to make a proposal that moved off of DOH. So I did. Some DAL guys see some good things in it, while others (like Cog here) see it totally unacceptable and illustrative of my many shortcomings.

I also recently made a challenge to any DAL guy out there to make a proposal that moved off of ratios. Guess what...not ONE taker. If this is any illustration of how our negotiations are going, then we will definitely see an arbitrated list.

Compromise means both sides moving off of their original positions. The DAL guys on this board feel that compromise means NWA pilots giving up DOH, while DAL pilots keep ratios.

Arbitrated list - here we come.

Carl
Carl,

Compromises aren't all or nothing. Delta guys can compromise yet still retain the ratio as the basis of an agreement. You seem to want to paint us as intrasigent if we don't come off the basic premise of current ratio. What about my post? You characterize my response as "totally unnacceptable and illustrative of my many shortcomings". What does that mean? I was merely suggesting a modification of straight ratio, +attrition that you proposed. You overreacted and tried to characterize my proposal as unreasonable. Agree that a negotiated list is unlikely

Cog
Reply
Old 11-11-2008 | 07:11 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

[quote=Carl Spackler;496687]
Originally Posted by Reroute

I'm going to go out on a limb here. I'll bet that the average 757 Captain at DAL with a 1995 (or so) hire date would have a real problem being ratioed in with a Virgin America Captain hired in 2007. Call me crazy, but I don't think that would sit too well.

Carl
Carl, maybe I wasn't clear. I don't think that Virgin America has a large gauge narrow bodied category similar to a 757 so that wouldn't be an issue. Furthermore, VA doesn't have any wide bodied international category. If the companies are relatively the same contractually, with no major wind fall and you apply Nicolau's award, with both captains and first officers from the international wide bodied categories on top, and then all the 767/757 domestic captains and first officers, you would run through over half the list before the first VA captain got integrated. Not many 767 captains over 50% down the list. With no bump and no flush as well as some conditions ad restrictions for a modest period of time to protect the pre-merger upgrade to the A320 for VA first officers, you'd have a list that protected pre merger expectations and status. I think it's important to realize what each side brings, whether it took the VA captain 2 years or 10 years to bring that A320 Captain job to the merger, at the end of the day he brought it.

Last edited by Reroute; 11-11-2008 at 07:18 PM.
Reply
Old 11-11-2008 | 09:38 PM
  #63  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

[quote=Reroute;496771]
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler

Carl, maybe I wasn't clear. I don't think that Virgin America has a large gauge narrow bodied category similar to a 757 so that wouldn't be an issue. Furthermore, VA doesn't have any wide bodied international category. If the companies are relatively the same contractually, with no major wind fall and you apply Nicolau's award, with both captains and first officers from the international wide bodied categories on top, and then all the 767/757 domestic captains and first officers, you would run through over half the list before the first VA captain got integrated. Not many 767 captains over 50% down the list. With no bump and no flush as well as some conditions ad restrictions for a modest period of time to protect the pre-merger upgrade to the A320 for VA first officers, you'd have a list that protected pre merger expectations and status. I think it's important to realize what each side brings, whether it took the VA captain 2 years or 10 years to bring that A320 Captain job to the merger, at the end of the day he brought it.
So, if you guys were merging with World, or Omni, or ATA before they went under, you would still be pushing for your slotted ratio seniority list?

Humm, that would be great for that 2001 hire at World who is now a DC-10 Captain.
Reply
Old 11-12-2008 | 02:53 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

[quote=newKnow;496889]
Originally Posted by Reroute

So, if you guys were merging with World, or Omni, or ATA before they went under, you would still be pushing for your slotted ratio seniority list?

Humm, that would be great for that 2001 hire at World who is now a DC-10 Captain.
I think you miss that "other" component of the slotted ratio system. That's job value. I don't care if your airplane is the biggest one in the system if it pays like poop, especially if you're going to use the argument that it can poop bigger than a smaller but equivalently paying aircraft. The slotted ratio system takes into account the value of what you bring to the table.

Oh, and remember, that's exactly how DAL did Pan Am and WAL, so there's a history. (Here's where you shout "it's not the same...)

Size matters, especially in compensation! Just ask your spouse!
Reply
Old 11-12-2008 | 05:21 AM
  #65  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Size matters, especially in compensation! Just ask your spouse!
Just to add another piece of meaningless info to this whole "my dad's bigger, my dad's richer" discussion..............the day prior to BOTH of us going into bankruptcy court, we made more than you guys did, YCLIU.

What I'm trying to say is, we all are trying to get back to something. Once again, thanks for supporting pay parity. I'll be gone by then, but REALLY good luck in section 6.

Ferd
Reply
Old 11-12-2008 | 07:24 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

[quote=newKnow;496889]
Originally Posted by Reroute

So, if you guys were merging with World, or Omni, or ATA before they went under, you would still be pushing for your slotted ratio seniority list?

Humm, that would be great for that 2001 hire at World who is now a DC-10 Captain.
I thought I mentioned if the two carriers were somewhat contractually similar. If they aren't, then you have to determine the value of that DC-10/MD-11 position.

How does DOH work if we eventually merge with CMR? DOH doesn't take into account job value, it doesn't balance equities, it's the same as assuming that a peso and a euro have the same value if they were minted on the same day. What matters is what a peso and a euro can buy you, similarly, what matters at NWA, DAL, CMR, Omni etc., is what your seniority number can buy you, not when your seniority number was minted.
Reply
Old 11-12-2008 | 08:01 AM
  #67  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by Reroute
How does DOH work if we eventually merge with CMR? DOH doesn't take into account job value, it doesn't balance equities, it's the same as assuming that a peso and a euro have the same value if they were minted on the same day. What matters is what a peso and a euro can buy you, similarly, what matters at NWA, DAL, CMR, Omni etc., is what your seniority number can buy you, not when your seniority number was minted.
I think this has always been the argument against a national seniority list. I agree there are different "tiers" in this profession. Like I said in another post, the difference between you, me and an RJ guy (or even an Omni guy) is we donated our interview suits to goodwill years ago.

Reroute, I am a major, international, legacy (how many adjectives can I come up with, oh yeah premium) airline pilot.......just like you.
Reply
Old 11-12-2008 | 01:54 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
I think this has always been the argument against a national seniority list. I agree there are different "tiers" in this profession. Like I said in another post, the difference between you, me and an RJ guy (or even an Omni guy) is we donated our interview suits to goodwill years ago.

Reroute, I am a major, international, legacy (how many adjectives can I come up with, oh yeah premium) airline pilot.......just like you.
Aw come on, don't sell yourself short. You're a tremendous slouch er...uh... I'm mean Super Premium!
Reply
Old 11-12-2008 | 02:00 PM
  #69  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by Deez340
Aw come on, don't sell yourself short. You're a tremendous slouch er...uh... I'm mean Super Premium!
Psssssst.........Deez, my wife and girlfriend agree on ONE thing, there is nothing premium about me
Reply
Old 11-12-2008 | 05:46 PM
  #70  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Cogf16
Carl,

What about my post? You characterize my response as "totally unnacceptable and illustrative of my many shortcomings". What does that mean? I was merely suggesting a modification of straight ratio, +attrition that you proposed. You overreacted and tried to characterize my proposal as unreasonable.

Cog
What on Earth are you talking about? You're the one who characterized me in the poor light...Remember?

Originally Posted by Cogf16
Carl,

Finally, your point about actual attrition being the only real quantifyable thing to be considered in a dynamic list is not valid. There are relative probabilities of many things happening that need to be taken into consideration. Certainly low probability things (like ALL the -9's going away in a yr or two) can be discounted but high prob things like the 6 777LR's that are paid for and coming in early 2009 and the many 737-700's in the same "category" need to be considered as "almost certain" To not consider these in a dynamic list is unfair and totally unreasonable. You lose all credibility by doing this.

Mark
Ring a bell?

It's hard to have a meaningful discussion if you don't even pay attention.

Carl
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jack Bauer
Mergers and Acquisitions
13
10-30-2008 06:47 AM
Scoop
Mergers and Acquisitions
119
10-27-2008 12:02 PM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
6
10-25-2008 07:07 AM
DAL4EVER
Mergers and Acquisitions
12
10-18-2008 01:02 PM
JetFlyer06
Mergers and Acquisitions
4
08-08-2008 08:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices