Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

An Omen Of Things To Come?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-25-2008, 10:18 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 593
Default

Originally Posted by Nosmo King View Post
The DAL
MEC has not agreed to our proposal and instead seeks to have all NWA grievance decisions be made by the Delta MEC structure.
"The Delta MEC structure" would be the new joint Delta MEC. I think that it's a good idea to have all NWA and DAL grievance decisions made by the new joint MEC administration. One of the reasons we have an MEC is to handle grievances. It doesn't matter whether an outstanding grievance was from a former NWA pilot or a former DAL pilot, they should all be handled the same, by our new MEC. I'm disapointed that an important issue that ought to have first been brought before the new MEC for consideration is trotted out and argued via ziplines and e-mails before the new MEC even has a chance to deliberate on how best to procede. Unfortunately, I guess that's the way some folks are use to doing business.

Last edited by Reroute; 12-25-2008 at 12:58 PM.
Reroute is offline  
Old 12-25-2008, 06:57 PM
  #72  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,879
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
I'm with you Ferd. I think I'm probably done with APC as well. I was wondering why this place was becoming sadly familiar, then your "arguing with the ex-wife" analogy brought it all home.

Carl
Done with APC - as in over? C'mon Carl, if it wasn't Thursday I would say somebody has a case of "The Mondays." Remember "The man who is worthwhile...."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGpQe...eature=related

Scoop

Last edited by Scoop; 12-25-2008 at 07:03 PM.
Scoop is offline  
Old 12-27-2008, 08:08 PM
  #73  
Inventory survival kit ..
Thread Starter
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

A little bird told me that the A330 has been penciled in on LAX-NRT as early as June 09. This will be over 12 hours once they get the flight time history established for the feds (A330 is operated at .82, optimum for the wing is ~.80)

I have been told but have not verified that the DAL MEC Chairman appoints most of the committee chairmen? At NWALPA they are elected by the MEC.

I hope the new MEC doesn't:

1. Give concessions on reconfiguring the crew bunk facility on the A330. (See existing language for flights between 8-12 hours).

2. Give a concession and let the company cram us in the Flight Attendant Rest Facility.

3. Staff the Crew Rest Facility Committee without an A330 pilot.

4. Put this on the back burner as an unimportant issue.
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 12-28-2008, 06:02 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
Default

The plan is to take out the jumpseat and the rest seat in the existing bunk room and install two fixed bunks one on top of the other. Not much room or comfortable but legal.
maddogmax is offline  
Old 12-28-2008, 09:40 AM
  #75  
Inventory survival kit ..
Thread Starter
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by maddogmax View Post
The plan is to take out the jumpseat and the rest seat in the existing bunk room and install two fixed bunks one on top of the other. Not much room or comfortable but legal.

Violates the current JPWA for flights more than 8 but less than 12 hours.

I don't think they plan on operating the modified aircraft only on flights longer than 12 hours. This is why I think we are headed for a CONCESSION. Of course they may just operate it on routes that have a flight time of 8-12 hours and tell us to file a grievance, since our grievances are at a standstill.
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 12-28-2008, 10:20 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
Default

Originally Posted by Nosmo King View Post
Violates the current JPWA for flights more than 8 but less than 12 hours.

I don't think they plan on operating the modified aircraft only on flights longer than 12 hours. This is why I think we are headed for a CONCESSION. Of course they may just operate it on routes that have a flight time of 8-12 hours and tell us to file a grievance, since our grievances are at a standstill.
Just curious, how does having two beds in the bunkroom violate the JPWA for flights between 8 and 12 hrs.?
wiggy is offline  
Old 12-28-2008, 10:36 AM
  #77  
Inventory survival kit ..
Thread Starter
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by wiggy View Post
Just curious, how does having two beds in the bunkroom violate the JPWA for flights between 8 and 12 hrs.?

It doesn't, the removal of the rest seat and the jump seat violates the JPWA.

Can't have 2 bunks and a rest seat and a jump seat, the compartment is too small.

16.C.2.d. on the A-330 aircraft:
1) the relief seat will be contained in a separate compartment located just aft of the
cockpit door which contains:
a) one fold-down bunk bed,
b) a fold-down relief seat, and
c) a jumpseat,
2) and is provided with a lockable door to the compartment.
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 12-28-2008, 11:02 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Delta Colors Busholio
Posts: 233
Default

Originally Posted by maddogmax View Post
The plan is to take out the jumpseat and the rest seat in the existing bunk room and install two fixed bunks one on top of the other. Not much room or comfortable but legal.
A lot like being on a submarine, rack pan and all!
Rotorhead is offline  
Old 12-29-2008, 12:26 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
Default

Originally Posted by Nosmo King View Post
It doesn't, the removal of the rest seat and the jump seat violates the JPWA.

Can't have 2 bunks and a rest seat and a jump seat, the compartment is too small.

16.C.2.d. on the A-330 aircraft:
1) the relief seat will be contained in a separate compartment located just aft of the
cockpit door which contains:
a) one fold-down bunk bed,
b) a fold-down relief seat, and
c) a jumpseat,

2) and is provided with a lockable door to the compartment.
Why 2 seats in the rest compartment? Is the JS in the rest compartment certified occupiable during T/O and landing? Horizontal racks are better than any business class seat, at least on the ER. (don't know about the new lie-flat BC seats) Two racks with no seats is better than forcing the 4th guy on >12hr flights to go to a BC seat (which he can't unless it is lie-flat) or "sleep with the F/As" (especially with their seniority on international!)(well, maybe you could on the layover if you've had enough to drink, and you are former Navy/Marine) I would imagine we'll give them (managmnt) relief for two racks in the existing compartment, but not for the other options. We currently have 6 or 7 ERs modified with 2 racks (and no seats) for >12hr ops. They are wonderful if you happen to get one going to Europe, much better than the reclining BC seat....thus my prejudice for anything horizontal. (I have avoided 4 pilot, >12hr trips, though) BTW, how is your rest seat on your 757s for >8hr. ops? Ours sucks....seat 1A...doesn't recline very far....half-a$$ed curtains w/ no privacy......

wiggy is offline  
Old 12-29-2008, 10:10 PM
  #80  
Inventory survival kit ..
Thread Starter
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by wiggy View Post
Why 2 seats in the rest compartment? Is the JS in the rest compartment certified occupiable during T/O and landing? Horizontal racks are better than any business class seat, at least on the ER. (don't know about the new lie-flat BC seats) Two racks with no seats is better than forcing the 4th guy on >12hr flights to go to a BC seat (which he can't unless it is lie-flat) or "sleep with the F/As" (especially with their seniority on international!)(well, maybe you could on the layover if you've had enough to drink, and you are former Navy/Marine) I would imagine we'll give them (managmnt) relief for two racks in the existing compartment, but not for the other options. We currently have 6 or 7 ERs modified with 2 racks (and no seats) for >12hr ops. They are wonderful if you happen to get one going to Europe, much better than the reclining BC seat....thus my prejudice for anything horizontal. (I have avoided 4 pilot, >12hr trips, though) BTW, how is your rest seat on your 757s for >8hr. ops? Ours sucks....seat 1A...doesn't recline very far....half-a$$ed curtains w/ no privacy......

JS is certified for TO and landing as long as the compartment door is latched open. The vertical back of the JS is physically attached to the underside of the bunk. So yes, it will lose us a usable jumpseat.

On the 747-400 there are two bunks stacked along with a rest seat in the compartment.

On the 747-400 and the A330 the BC seats are flat but not quite horizontal. I find them to be useless for sleep, but much better than a seat in steerage class.

As I mentioned in another thread, mamagement would have to remove:

a. Rest seat
b. Jump seat
c. PED power console (120V power plug identical to the biz class seats)

Things they would have to add:

Reading lights for the lower bunk. The current lights are all ceiling mounted/above the bunk including one on a gooseneck.

Oxygen mask for the lower bunk. The current oxygen setup is from a drop down panel in the ceiling (same as passenger cabin) and would be inaccessible from the lower bunk.

Air vent for lower bunk. Current configuration - one eyeball vent above the heater control on the wall opposite the bunk.

There is another piece of equipment against the aircraft skin where a second bunk would go, I don't know what it is, but it would also have to be removed.

Bag storage for a 4th pilot. There is currently enought room in the cockpit and the rest facility for three rollaboard suitcases. Sounds like the junior FO gets to stow his bag in biz class.

Sleeping in the FA bunks is a fatigue call waiting to happen. The FA schedule would have them parading in and out of the rest area in the middle of the pilot breaks.

There are other considerations but this post is already too long.
Nosmo King is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hendefea
Regional
23
11-25-2008 08:15 AM
SkyHigh
Leaving the Career
143
11-17-2008 09:31 PM
paxhauler85
Regional
177
11-02-2008 10:55 PM
coldpilot
Money Talk
2
10-22-2008 12:37 PM
Waldo11
Your Photos and Videos
8
09-17-2008 08:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices