![]() |
Originally Posted by andili61
(Post 2562504)
Well, when ALPA used to publish hiring numbers using pie charts, 45% of United new hires came from XJT. Then, CPP was implemented and that number reduced drastically. CPP is not a recruiting tool for United, but rather, a system to attract, retain, and control United's regionals staffing
Not of all pilots hired |
Originally Posted by andili61
(Post 2562537)
I don't know the terms of your CPP contract. In XJT only ERJ pilots working for United express were allowed to go into the CPP. I don't know Mesa's terms. Nonetheless, I wouldn't be surprised that CRJ are not allowed. But I don't know.
|
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2562641)
CRJ Pilots in IAD will be allowed per the video on the Mesa website.
|
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2565860)
The Mesa website was updated to indicate a pilot needs to be a UAX pilot for the last 12 months in order to be eligible for the United CPP program. What will this do for IAH and IAD bases?
2. Way to screw over the rest of us who worked for United for years. |
Originally Posted by Sennant
(Post 2565864)
1. Where do you see that?
2. Way to screw over the rest of us who worked for United for years. http://www.mesa-air.com/content.aspx?pageID=31342&CNM=United%20Airlines%20 Career%20Path%20Program |
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2565860)
The Mesa website was updated to indicate a pilot needs to be a UAX pilot for the last 12 months in order to be eligible for the United CPP program. What will this do for IAH and IAD bases?
|
What a deplorable shame. They thought they had retention problems on the United side, watch what happens on the American side now.
Par for course. |
Originally Posted by deltajuliet
(Post 2566072)
What a deplorable shame. They thought they had retention problems on the United side, watch what happens on the American side now.
Par for course. It has a big enough draw, and enough United pilots are hired through it, that Xjet pilots stick with Xjet for years to get their United interview. So, it works in how the program was intended. It attracts new UAX regional pilots and retains UAX regional pilots. For Xjet, this has to be a disaster, now a Mesa pilots gets the one benefit that Xjet touted as uniquely Xjet’s. With 6 year upgrades, what does Xjet have to offer a new pilot? Flying a 145? An ever shrinking base structure? |
I know why they did it, but it also goes against the very idea of collective bargaining.
Suddenly half our pilot group has substantially different benefits. |
Hmm, your retention problems are going to skyrocket as you slowly move to out station basing and everyone ends up with a two leg commute.
|
Originally Posted by deltajuliet
(Post 2566167)
I know why they did it, but it also goes against the very idea of collective bargaining.
Suddenly half our pilot group has substantially different benefits. They want to offer this to the UAX side but the Eagle side can’t particpate? Fine, let’s negotiate a retention bonus for the Eagle side for example. For God’s try to negotiate something! This is carrot to bring in new hires, it has little to do with pilots on the property. |
Originally Posted by airspeedsalive
(Post 2566187)
This is exactly right. If this is something the company wants, it should be negotiated.
They want to offer this to the UAX side but the Eagle side can’t particpate? Fine, let’s negotiate a retention bonus for the Eagle side for example. For God’s try to negotiate something! This is carrot to bring in new hires, it has little to do with pilots on the property. |
Originally Posted by No Land 3
(Post 2566179)
Hmm, your retention problems are going to skyrocket as you slowly move to out station basing and everyone ends up with a two leg commute.
Look, we have our eyes wide open. Great Lakes has shut down due to lack of pilots. Other regionals will follow suit as the shortage worsens. And, when Great Lakes bit the dust, the regionals circled like vultures offering class dates without interviews. Many of us are simply watching what happens next. Opportunities are out there. |
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2566202)
If that happens, sure. Right now, ATL appears it will go senior based on the number of pilots that already two leg commute where ATL will reduce commuting.
Look, we have our eyes wide open. Great Lakes has shut down due to lack of pilots. Other regionals will follow suit as the shortage worsens. And, when Great Lakes bit the dust, the regionals circled like vultures offering class dates without interviews. Many of us are simply watching what happens next. Opportunities are out there. |
Originally Posted by airspeedsalive
(Post 2566187)
This is exactly right. If this is something the company wants, it should be negotiated.
They want to offer this to the UAX side but the Eagle side can’t particpate? Fine, let’s negotiate a retention bonus for the Eagle side for example. For God’s try to negotiate something! This is carrot to bring in new hires, it has little to do with pilots on the property. You aren’t sitting in IAH where pilots are looking at the requirements and whether they already meet them. I think it will help at least with retention on the Ejet. |
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2566207)
Don’t you think American would have be the major to offer any retention benefits, or a similar program to CPP, since United is offering this at no financial cost to Mesa?
You aren’t sitting in IAH where pilots are looking at the requirements and whether they already meet them. I think it will help at least with retention on the Ejet. |
Originally Posted by airspeedsalive
(Post 2566241)
I’d feel the same way if it was AA offering something and the UAX pilots were excluded. If it doesn’t benefit the entire pilot group we shouldn’t want it - just my .02
What happens to pilots if Mesa loses the United Ejet contract? Do all these pilots just get furloughed since there is no Ejets for them to fly? |
Originally Posted by No Land 3
(Post 2566204)
That’s the most important thing, keep your eyes open, and pounce on any opportunity that comes. Those who hesitate will get trapped.
|
Originally Posted by deltajuliet
(Post 2566167)
I know why they did it, but it also goes against the very idea of collective bargaining..
|
United CPP comes to Mesa
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2566256)
I am not going to pounce on any opportunity. I looked briefly at Republic. Then, it became clear that IAH was going to be a senior base and upgrading there would set me back. They became a non-starter.
Who will Republic fly for in the new IAH base? FWIW I’m sure it will not remain a small base for very long after opening. Some explain how could upgrading or sitting CA Rsv being home-based set someone back? |
Originally Posted by SilentLurker
(Post 2566296)
Who will Republic fly for in the new IAH base?
FWIW I’m sure it will not remain a small base for very long after opening. Some explain how could upgrading or sitting CA Rsv being home-based set someone back? |
Originally Posted by SilentLurker
(Post 2566296)
Some explain how could upgrading or sitting CA Rsv being home-based set someone back?
I will wait and see what happens. And, given that many regionals have street upgrades these days, if Mesa faulters, I will leave and commute for one of these regionals as a Captain. |
Originally Posted by SilentLurker
(Post 2566296)
Some explain how could upgrading or sitting CA Rsv being home-based set someone back? Sitting RSV and flying the right seat makes it harder build PIC. |
Originally Posted by bnkangle
(Post 2566359)
Well there’s a good chance you’ll have to sit ready which might be worse than being incarcerated.
Sitting RSV and flying the right seat makes it harder build PIC. |
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2566256)
I am not going to pounce on any opportunity. I looked briefly at Republic. Then, it became clear that IAH was going to be a senior base and upgrading there would set me back. They became a non-starter.
|
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2565860)
The Mesa website was updated to indicate a pilot needs to be a UAX pilot for the last 12 months in order to be eligible for the United CPP program. What will this do for IAH and IAD bases?
|
Originally Posted by NovemberBravo
(Post 2570786)
Just randomly checked the website again and looks like they took out the previous 12 months part. Anyone hear anything
Mesa also added bachelor’s degree “or obtained other applicable credentials acceptable to United”. It seems most of our CA’s with 2 years or more of experience qualify based on the website. If they don’t, I would like to know why. |
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2570808)
Yeah, I saw that had happened too. The 12 months is still there, it just doesn’t specify that one must be a UAX pilot; only a Mesa pilot.
Mesa also added bachelor’s degree “or obtained other applicable credentials acceptable to United”. It seems most of our CA’s with 2 years or more of experience qualify based on the website. If they don’t, I would like to know why. |
Originally Posted by NovemberBravo
(Post 2570817)
I’m guessing applicable credentials just gives UA the ability to look over the degree requirement but that’ll probably be super rare.
My line of thought starting out was that the majors wanted a degree. I knew I would have to have one to be competitive, so I got the degree. My GPA is horrible, but I can check the box. That and a whole lot of luck has landed a pretty good career. |
Originally Posted by Itsajob
(Post 2576026)
They may qualify, but most likely won’t make the cut. United wants a 4 year degree. I tried to help a friend get on who has multiple type ratings but only a 2 year degree. They said no thanks. Other than being able to check the box on an application I have never used my degree or even been asked a single question about college in any airline interview. Until they run out of qualified applicants with the degree I don’t expect things to change. So for now 3,000 hours and a degree is better than 15,000 and no degree.
My line of thought starting out was that the majors wanted a degree. I knew I would have to have one to be competitive, so I got the degree. My GPA is horrible, but I can check the box. That and a whole lot of luck has landed a pretty good career. I have a friend at UAL who has no college. Period. Not because he didn't have the ability or was lazy. He just said it wasn't for him. He made up for the lack of college by teaching ground school for 121/135 airplanes (regional with 121 and 135 turboprops), LCA, and flight instruction in the planes. He was immersed in the training and certification of pilots as well as a line pilot. Great guy with great attitude and abilities. I can't speak for him but I bet he would tell you it is easier to get on with UAL if you are in the group of 99% instead of the group of 1%. While he might have been in the group of 1% without a degree he is definitely somewhere in the top percent of the pilot group. Good luck. |
Has anyone looked into initiating the process yet? I would guess at least 25% of our CA’s are already qualified.
|
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2576299)
Has anyone looked into initiating the process yet? I would guess at least 25% of our CA’s are already qualified.
|
Originally Posted by MagPBS
(Post 2576311)
Latest is details still isn't final, so nothing to apply to yet.
This is an existing program at other regionals. What and where is the hold-up? |
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2576314)
So, possibly a recruiting tool that never manifests itself in reality......
This is an existing program at other regionals. What and where is the hold-up? Consider this like a contract. The ta is agreed to the final language is working over out. That’s as much as we know. My info comes from the p2p network btw not some inside info. |
Originally Posted by MagPBS
(Post 2576329)
No it will happen. And we are unlike any of the other airlines in the program. Remember how it went up you had to be in a Ua base and then that changed?
Consider this like a contract. The ta is agreed to the final language is working over out. That’s as much as we know. My info comes from the p2p network btw not some inside info. |
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2577157)
I expect the CPP to fall through. All the other UAX regionals (Republic and SkyWest) that fly the same jet for other majors can’t get the CPP.
|
Originally Posted by 20sx
(Post 2577640)
It's not falling through, and the sky isn't falling. The details aren't worked out yet, but United is on board for this.
|
Originally Posted by calmwinds
(Post 2577648)
Once we have this hammered out, United should be on board with Republic and SkyWest having a CPP for the very same reason..... we will blaze the trail for other regionals.... and, then, the CPP won’t matter.
|
Originally Posted by Idontevenfly
(Post 2577694)
It seems like they are just giving the cpp to the regionals that are struggling with retaining pilots honestly.
Endeavor and the AA regionals are the only ones growing right now. |
Originally Posted by Idontevenfly
(Post 2577694)
It seems like they are just giving the cpp to the regionals that are struggling with retaining pilots honestly.
ALPA for ALPA only |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:10 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands