Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa 4.0 what’s the latest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2021, 06:42 AM
  #1051  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by kevin18 View Post
People either don’t understand that or just don’t care.
The idea that not picking up would result in a raise is just plain false. It’s a simple and insufficient understanding of the dynamic and culture.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-08-2021, 06:47 AM
  #1052  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by terks43 View Post
Good to see the operational meltdown beginning today. The company deserves it as a result of their own staggering incompetence. Hopefully no one picks up those set of flights. Need to learn to stop relying on the pilot group to bail them out of their own problems.

This is like not putting gas in your car because of an oil spill in the gulf. The only one you are hurting is you.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-08-2021, 06:49 AM
  #1053  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by jetlag q View Post
I literally said this to an Fo a couple of days ago. The 300 % is good and more bad for the pilot group.

it’s good because we get an opportunity to get a ln increase in pay.

it’s bad because although one pilot gets increased pay for a series of flights the guy in the right seat is flying at straight pay. And so are so many others.

it’s bad because if we keep taking 300% the staffing level never gets corrected.

it’s bad because they pay rate never increases. To lore pilots to mesa.

but explain that to the new hire that’s getting 36/37 $ an hour who doesn’t even want to wait for the email to go from 200% to 300%.

Let’s say no one picked up 300 pct. The solution the company has is to hire more. That’s not going to result in a raise. It’s going to result in higher new hire bonuses with longer retention contracts and it’s NOT helpful to the pilot group at all.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-08-2021, 06:52 AM
  #1054  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by terks43 View Post
here’s a hint, if the company could hire 5% more people they would. The fact of the matter is with current pay they flat out can’t. And the only way they could hire more people then they are currently losing is by raising pay. I don’t know why that is so complicated. It’s not rocket science people.
But you are wrong. You are wrong because classes are full with a back log of applications. The company can hire just fine. They misjudged how many FO’s would leave on the crj side when their bonus contracts were up and there was no upgrade IN TYPE in sight. This is a temporary problem fixed by moving new hires to the crj. In 3 months this will be a memory.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-08-2021, 06:54 AM
  #1055  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by WhiteNoiz View Post
First time posting here, so I’m sorry if this is the wrong place but this seems to be the most active thread.

I was called for an interview, and it’s scheduled in the next couple days. I’m interviewing for the ERJ, which I have not seen as many complaints about in this thread. I have pending interviews with a couple of other regionals too but from the way I see it Mesa is offering a much larger initial bonus (I understand hourly pay is trash), shorter upgrade time (according to the interviewer, so correct me if I have bad info), and a base with lower cost of living than any other regional is going to want to stick me (I’m not trying to commute).

All that being said, I see a lot of posts on here basically saying buyer beware. I have read most of this thread and I think I have an idea of what everyone’s mad about. So, my question to anyone reading this is: Is the QOL alone bad enough to turn down a CJO here? Or is it an ok place for someone who can make it work for them?

Any insight is appreciated

All those things are true. It’s not a bad gig on the United side.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-08-2021, 06:56 AM
  #1056  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by terks43 View Post
Probably worth it. I wouldn’t commute to this company and IAD is super senior on the CA side. If IAH also consider SKW. Also depends on how long you plan on staying. This company doesn’t have many years left. So as long as you plan to be out in a few years that won’t be a factor. But if you are expecting a longer stay I would run away from this powder keg. We are becoming a senior pilot group. And when a regional becomes too heavy with top of the pay scale earners it gets undercut (just look at what happened to XJT) the same thing will happen here. The lifers of Mesa will bring about its downfall.
We lose more senior pilots to death than attrition. But we are LESS senior now than when I was hired. It’s not becoming a senior pilot group.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-08-2021, 06:58 AM
  #1057  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by Swarley View Post
I couldn’t in good conscience advise you to take the offer here. But you can always take a chance on it and try to get in the aviate program with United to have a way out. Just know as of now, ERJ training is 6+ months and 3+ years to upgrade. I’m a few months away from my 4 year mark and still too junior to upgrade. Vastly different from when I first got here. I tell everyone to go after a wholly owned. They seem the most secure and offer a way out.
We are losing pilots with less than 5 years here to United via Aviate. It’s faster than any flow. At present.

Last edited by pangolin; 12-08-2021 at 07:08 AM.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-08-2021, 07:01 AM
  #1058  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
Why is that? Are a large portion of the CA on the CRJ lifers, or what?
No. The fleet shrank from 63 to 40. They only allow 6 to swap types in a year.
pangolin is offline  
Old 12-08-2021, 07:01 AM
  #1059  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 744
Default

Originally Posted by Snapper86 View Post
Ain’t that the truth, the world of aviation has changed drastically over the past two years. FO’s with 500-1000 total 121 time are getting hired left and right to other airlines and fractionals. The old saying of needing to get 1,000 PIC in 121 is exactly that, OLD. Come to Mesa, you won’t sit reserve. Fly the line for 8 months and move on! If you sit around and don’t have a major training event for 4-5 years and you’re trying to apply elsewhere, that’s when you’re going to see it being harder to move on

Agreed, but I’m not counting on things staying this way. The majors are hiring a ton in ‘22 but things will quickly go the other way as staffing needs are met. By ‘23 I believe 1000 PIC will again be the standard. Plan for the worst but hope for the best. In this industry things change quickly. If you always make plans based on the way things are you will always be surprised when things change.
DoSomePilotStuf is offline  
Old 12-08-2021, 08:59 AM
  #1060  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 310
Default

#1 to IAH…. unless it’s a mis-award lol.
MysteriousMrX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hdale
Regional
8
08-26-2021 11:49 PM
Flying Ninja
Mesa Airlines
57
02-22-2016 04:36 PM
cat22planes
Career Questions
20
02-12-2015 07:18 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
3
11-19-2011 09:25 PM
Lbell911
Regional
13
12-28-2007 08:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices