Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2014, 05:34 AM
  #2871  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Navmode's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet View Post
It could be that JO himself just got blindsided by this. How many planes is AA giving out in total over the next few years, anyway? I'm sure there are a few more planned.
Originally Posted by Snickers View Post
You know those planes they are just 'giving out over the next few years' are coming at the expense of your peers right? Seems like a pretty inappropriate time to be drooling over Eagle flying...
Just so we're clear, the speculation was about additional airplanes, rather than transfers from envoy. Mesa owns all of the airplanes in the crj fleet.
Navmode is offline  
Old 09-06-2014, 09:30 AM
  #2872  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 737
Default

Originally Posted by Navmode View Post
Just so we're clear, the speculation was about additional airplanes, rather than transfers from envoy. Mesa owns all of the airplanes in the crj fleet.
Agreed, the earlier speculation discussed the hunt in South America (?) for crj 700's.
20sx is offline  
Old 09-06-2014, 10:49 AM
  #2873  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PiperPower's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 317
Default Mesa

Is per diem still $1.36 or has that gone up? What is an average per diem check for an ejet line holder?
PiperPower is offline  
Old 09-06-2014, 11:29 AM
  #2874  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
Default

$1.44 per diem. Not sure on the per diem check for EJET. The lines are still evolving, so what the average is now may not be the case in 6 months.
Xdashdriver is offline  
Old 09-06-2014, 01:18 PM
  #2875  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by 24/48 View Post
Sorry flaps but your post is riddled with emotional SJS drivel, and if you knew anything about what is going on in the industry then you would understand that it's more than just getting the beloved wide body seat.

As a United pilot myself I'd like to address the hiring. We are interviewing 26 a week for the foreseeable future. Of which about 71% are successful. We need to hire 1600 pilots by spring 2016. Starting in 2015 we will be averaging 2 wide body deliveries a month, 2 narrow body deliveries a month, and are actively seeking used 737-700/A319 aircraft instead of E190/CS3000 aircraft. United and ALPA have teamed up and have been putting on job fairs for ALPA pilots ONLY.

As far as upgrade or wide body flying...all I can say is that I am moving up an average of 30 numbers a month (65 from August to September) and those numbers are expected to increase. Some new hires are currently being hired on to the 757/767 fleet flying to Europe, and Hawaii.



I know several folks at Emirates, of which some are looking for recommendations here at UAL. The main reason is that the novelty of flying the heavy jets has worn off and the abusive schedules, and long distance from family has set in. That may very well change if you can be based in the states but so goes the tax free pay, and luxurious living conditions enjoyed in DXB.

I can tell you from personal experience as a current UAL 777 FO, the novelty has worn off and I'm ready for a change. Simply put, everything gets old after a while, especially long haul/ultra long haul flying, and that is all you'll ever do at Emirates/Etihad/Qatar. Oh yeah, Qatar doesn't have a seniority list, all merit based, awesome!!!



Agreed that the railway labor act is out-dated and needs a major wholesaling. But lets talk about scope. If you understood both the DAL and UAL scope sections then you would notice that scope is being dealt with, pretty vigorously I might add. I will also add that the gauge increase in the UAL contract is a direct result of DAL's contract. In other words, we couldn't ask for all the good stuff that the DAL pilots enjoy without some of the bad. That said, both scope sections reduce dramatically the overall size of the RJ population. The UAL contract goes a step further....as they park the 50 seaters and replace them with 70/76 seaters (including the Q400's) at a rate of about 2.3:1 we also reduce the narrow body block hour percentage those 70/76 seaters can fly. This is why UAL is actively looking at the used 737-700/A319 market. We are decreasing regional utilization and increasing mainline utilization, sounds good to me.



ALPA-PAC has nothing to do with contracts dealing with QOL/pay/etc. The PAC has everything to do with making sure this profession doesn't go the way of the maritime industry. Sure those foreign airlines pay more than the regionals but they fall short of the majors and when the novelty of flying the heavies is worn out you have no recourse, suck it up because they have pilots in the pipeline from Singapore giddy about making $50 an hour flying "sparky" (787) around.

Be careful what you wish for! Also, do a little research before you post. But you at least answered a question from an earlier post of mine, apparently Skywest pilots are not actively engaged in the profession and simply wait around until the next unionized regional makes some gains that will eventually get Jerry to pony up. Awesome!
I just don't think it is appropriate or necessary for ALPA to ask regional new hires for contributions to a fund that does absolutely nothing to address the glaring disparity between mainline pilots and regional pilots. Especially when those PAC funds are going to fight airlines that can and do put direct wage pressure on US airlines.

Congrats on making it to United--fwiw I'd be saying the exact same things you're saying if I was there. Everyone should fight for what is in their own best interest--for you, that means protecting US legacies. For me, that means not protecting US legacies, and allowing Emirates & Ethiad to do as much flying here as they want.

I'm not going to devote money to a fractional possibility that one day--years from now--I might have a seat at a US legacy. I think the probability of having a seat at a foreign carrier is a much more likely near-term possibility. Until those perceptions change, I won't support ALPA-PAC (or ALPA in general). ALPA has acted counter to my own financial and career interests so many times in the last decade, I simply don't trust anything they say or do. This includes the idea they're selling with the ALPA-PAC: "regional guys--you have to help us pay to protect our jobs at airlines that you have a very small statistical chance of being hired at in the next thirty years."

For many regional pilots:

(Perceived economic outcome of getting hired at a legacy * probability of getting hired at a legacy)

is greater than

(Perceived economic outcome of being stuck at a regional for life * probability of being stuck at a reigonal for life)

Thus, those regional pilots are supportive of efforts to protect US legacies.

For me personally, my perceptions of those probabilities have shifted through my last two reigonal jobs, and I don't buy it.

Maybe that will change if legacies actually start hiring people who are not check airmen, military, or EEO hires in droves.

Last edited by flapshalfspeed; 09-06-2014 at 01:45 PM.
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Old 09-06-2014, 06:52 PM
  #2876  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Snickers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: Satisfied
Posts: 379
Default

How many planes is AA giving out in total over the next few years, anyway? I'm sure there are a few more planned.

Originally Posted by 20sx View Post
Agreed, the earlier speculation discussed the hunt in South America (?) for crj 700's.

The hunt in South America for CR7s for AA to give out??

I must be missing something...

Snickers is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 12:08 AM
  #2877  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

Originally Posted by Snickers View Post
How many planes is AA giving out in total over the next few years, anyway? I'm sure there are a few more planned.




The hunt in South America for CR7s for AA to give out??

I must be missing something...

When I first posted that, I had it in my head that AA was giving 700's to PSA, not transferring them from Envoy. Hadn't read the story closely enough before posting; my mistake. It seemed surprising because I had heard a few rumors about Mesa acquiring some more 700's for the American feed.

But for clarification, are these alleged (South American?) 700's to be bought by Mesa or by AA and then lent to Mesa?
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 03:33 AM
  #2878  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Navmode's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by deltajuliet View Post
When I first posted that, I had it in my head that AA was giving 700's to PSA, not transferring them from Envoy. Hadn't read the story closely enough before posting; my mistake. It seemed surprising because I had heard a few rumors about Mesa acquiring some more 700's for the American feed.

But for clarification, are these alleged (South American?) 700's to be bought by Mesa or by AA and then lent to Mesa?
Bought by mesa. I'm just highlighting that any new flying hasn't involved taking anyone else's airplanes.
Navmode is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 05:19 AM
  #2879  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by Navmode View Post
Bought by mesa. I'm just highlighting that any new flying hasn't involved taking anyone else's airplanes.

How could Mesa afford new planes? That $30m credit card we just announced doesn't seem like the best way to finance a number of aircraft, nor is it enough.
RV5M is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 06:39 AM
  #2880  
sippin' dat koolaid
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: gear slinger
Posts: 982
Default

Originally Posted by Navmode View Post
Bought by mesa. I'm just highlighting that any new flying hasn't involved taking anyone else's airplanes.
But but but...How is everyone supposed to b*tch and talk sh#! about us if we are not stealing everyone else's airplanes? What will the trolls of APC do then?
tinman1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
Spanky189
Regional
10
05-16-2008 09:38 AM
familyguy
Regional
49
04-11-2008 12:03 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
104
08-17-2007 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices