Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

New Mesa Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2015, 10:11 PM
  #501  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by Smutter View Post
I think you guys will pass it
Only if United or AA comes out in a joint statement with Mesa management with a promise of new airplanes and/or flow, conditional upon us passing this TA. Then it would pass (and I would vote yes).

Otherwise...sorry, no. I'm estimating the maximum "yes" vote will be single digit percentages.
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Old 08-14-2015, 10:17 PM
  #502  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed View Post
Only if United or AA comes out in a joint statement with Mesa management with a promise of new airplanes and/or flow, conditional upon us passing this TA.
If I wanted to be like psa pilots I would have gone to PSA. New planes so I can vote in this garbage? No thanks.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 08-14-2015, 10:24 PM
  #503  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: men without hats
Posts: 369
Default

The LCR language is too vague I can smell the grievances already. Also not sure how I feel about the whole "time balancing" since it renders CMF/CML status irrelevant since everyone on RSV will now be used equally whether they want to be or not. How is this a gain? It's a gain for the company.
121again is offline  
Old 08-14-2015, 10:50 PM
  #504  
Gets Weekends Off
 
airflight999's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by 121again View Post
"When a pilot holding a First Officer bid is assigned to Captain’s duties, such pilot will be paid for all trips flown as Captain at Captain rates."

*** does that even mean?
I think it means if a captain puts in his/her bid for an FO slot, but they're still flying as captain, they'll be paid as captain.

So, let's say for example a junior reserve PHX captain bids FO so they don't get displaced to DFW, they still get paid captain pay as long as they're flying as captain.

That's my take anyways.
airflight999 is offline  
Old 08-14-2015, 10:50 PM
  #505  
Chief Engineer
 
ScottyDo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 815
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
If I wanted to be like psa pilots I would have gone to PSA. New planes so I can vote in this garbage? No thanks.
Well you have to remember that there are more FO's than there are lifer captains. More A/C does mean more upgrade opportunities and more $$$. And like FB said it would pass in a heart beat ha.
ScottyDo is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 02:38 AM
  #506  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
Default

Originally Posted by airflight999 View Post
I think it means if a captain puts in his/her bid for an FO slot, but they're still flying as captain, they'll be paid as captain.

So, let's say for example a junior reserve PHX captain bids FO so they don't get displaced to DFW, they still get paid captain pay as long as they're flying as captain.

That's my take anyways.
I think it more refers to a case where there is a PIC-qualified FO. If he gets assigned a CA trip then he would get paid at the CA rate instead of the FO rate. This situation may happen right after a displacement where a CA is downgraded to FO but is still qualified per the FAA to be PIC.
Xdashdriver is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 04:10 AM
  #507  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: Airbus FO
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by 121again View Post
The LCR language is too vague I can smell the grievances already. Also not sure how I feel about the whole "time balancing" since it renders CMF/CML status irrelevant since everyone on RSV will now be used equally whether they want to be or not. How is this a gain? It's a gain for the company.
I agree totally. After looking at this I see so many vague things this thing is going to be a grievance nightmare! You would think these guys negotiating would have learned we needed specific language, not just more air filled language. How about something like..after 4 or more reports of bed bugs in any rolling 6 month period, the company will find a new hotel to put crews up permanently. Not, we will be notified and discuss the situation garbage...

I love how after coming back from a flight, the contract states they could reassign you to ready reserve. Per the FAR and the latest interpretations they cannot assign you RR. Only more flying, or regular reserve. Errors already. Unless something has been redefined recently.

I don't like this reserve system balancing either. I don't see how that benefits anyone. If you are junior you need hours to consolidate anyway. As you get senior, you get better trips ahead of time if you are CMF and that helps with commuting. If you are home based you can bid CML and sit at home. So reserve balancing would be worse for everyone I think. I don't see how it would benefit Mesa either.
wt932051 is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 04:13 AM
  #508  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: Airbus FO
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by Xdashdriver View Post
I think it more refers to a case where there is a PIC-qualified FO. If he gets assigned a CA trip then he would get paid at the CA rate instead of the FO rate. This situation may happen right after a displacement where a CA is downgraded to FO but is still qualified per the FAA to be PIC.
This is dangerous to have this! That means less Captain slots. This means Mesa can run razor thin as Captains knowing they have a few PIC qualified FO's instead of paying them full time as a Captain. All they need is a line check every two years to stay qualified. Easy to do on Mesa's part. This probably is protection for the future incase we start parking planes and Mesa needs to downgrade again. Lets not play with fire on this clause.
wt932051 is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 04:17 AM
  #509  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: Airbus FO
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by ScottyDo View Post
Well you have to remember that there are more FO's than there are lifer captains. More A/C does mean more upgrade opportunities and more $$$. And like FB said it would pass in a heart beat ha.
Agreed. Even the new FO's are now starting to realize they might actually have to live with these FO rates for awhile so this contract is garbage in that respect.
wt932051 is offline  
Old 08-15-2015, 04:21 AM
  #510  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
Default

Originally Posted by wt932051 View Post
This is dangerous to have this! That means less Captain slots. This means Mesa can run razor thin as Captains knowing they have a few PIC qualified FO's instead of paying them full time as a Captain. All they need is a line check every two years to stay qualified. Easy to do on Mesa's part. This probably is protection for the future incase we start parking planes and Mesa needs to downgrade again. Lets not play with fire on this clause.
It's in the current contract and was in the contract prior to that, so unless Mesa used it during the last downgrade, it's unlikely they would do it in the future.
Xdashdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
Past V1
Regional
6
06-23-2008 08:40 AM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM
calcapt
Regional
17
12-27-2006 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices