Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Air Force waste, tell us your story! >

Air Force waste, tell us your story!

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Air Force waste, tell us your story!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2008, 08:17 PM
  #51  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,920
Default

You just never know when terrorists are going to be wearing the wrong length of socks while waiting in line at the chow hall.
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 06-10-2008, 08:23 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

I particularly like wearing reflective gear at night to aid enemy snipers/observers. If only they'd take out a few uniform monitors... It amazes me how f-d up the priorities were on base over there. I guess the incoming rockets and mortars(or the IED vehicle graveyard) weren't enough to remind them of where we really were.
Slice is offline  
Old 06-10-2008, 09:08 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Herkdrv's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Mostly Herks. Soon to be Guppys and FRED
Posts: 280
Default

Originally Posted by capoetc View Post
What "allowed (me) to still have this outlook through a career leading to retirement"? I'll tell you:

I believe that the Air Force is a strong, noble organization that does great things for our nation, even with its warts. I believe that when I saw problems/waste, it was my responsibility to try my best to fix those problems rather than simply noting that they exist and then listing them on a forum to show how terrible the organization is.

Does the Air Force have problems? Of course ... all large organizations do. As I see the examples of waste here in this thread, I agree that some of them are wasteful. I see some of them as parts of a bigger picture that are driven by forces often beyond the Air Force's control.

Incidentally, I saw a post saying that I was probably deployed overseas and spending all my time telling people to tuck their shirt in or put on socks ... that is partly true. I did not spend all my time doing it, but when I saw a violation I corrected it on the spot. Do you know why? Because the reason for the very strict uniform policy was for force protection. It is very, very easy for the terrorists to get American uniforms. They might even be able to gain access to facilities by getting a job as a 3rd country national. What they likely would NOT do is realize how EXACTLY to wear our uniforms. So, if you see a guy running around in US pt gear with no socks or with his shirt not tucked in, then you challenge him -- if all the good guys are in the proper uniform worn correctly, then the guy who is out of uniform is probably the terrorist. That's exactly what happened at a site in Fallujah -- an Army Sgt noticed a guy in American uniform, worn improperly, and when he challenged him the guy started running. The Sgt ran inside the internet cafe and got everyone out just before it exploded.

SOS: Clearly, whatever I say is going to have no bearing on opinions here, and that is fine. However, I still have not seen anyone suggest a valid method for selecting who goes to SOS given that not everyone can attend. The fact is that, at that point in an officer's career, there are a few clearly superior performers and a few clearly inferior performers and a whole bunch of officers in the middle. SOS in correspondence gives AF leaders a simple way of allowing officers to de-select themselves. And, BTW, SOS is definitely NOT a "re-blueing" school. Since officers at that point in their careers have (for the most part) not been assigned outside the AF, that is simply not an issue.

Finally, I appreciate your concern for my family, but I did not use overhead transparencies when I went to school. In fact, as an airlift pilot, I thought it would be best for me to spend some time with the Army, so I went to the Army Command and General Staff College in Leavenworth KS. It turned out to be a fantastic experience, and it helped me immensely in understanding how Army officers think -- which proved extremely helpful when I was assigned to Balad Air Base in Iraq working Army aircraft bed down issues, among other things.

And guess what? It didn't even cost me my first marriage, as you so crassly suggest -- my wife and I are doing very well, thank you very much.
Give me a break dude Quit trying to justify your actions as the uniform nazi. It baffles me as to why people would waste their time enforcing stupid uniform regs that change every other week when we are fighting a war over there. We already have standards for uniforms why don't we just follow what we do at home station. Oh and when it gets hotter than hell then use common sense standards! Come to think about it why is it that in 11 years of active duty and one with the reserves I've only had my balls busted for "uniform wear" only in the AOR and NEVER anywhere else?

How about the same way the Sq/CC and the DO select who is going on to A/C school, IP school, or EP upgrade. The fact of the matter is there are numerous ways for the leadership to select who is to go and who stays.
Herkdrv is offline  
Old 06-10-2008, 09:42 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: I pilot
Posts: 2,049
Default

Originally Posted by Herkdrv View Post
Give me a break dude Quit trying to justify your actions as the uniform nazi. It baffles me as to why people would waste their time enforcing stupid uniform regs that change every other week when we are fighting a war over there. We already have standards for uniforms why don't we just follow what we do at home station. Oh and when it gets hotter than hell then use common sense standards! Come to think about it why is it that in 11 years of active duty and one with the reserves I've only had my balls busted for "uniform wear" only in the AOR and NEVER anywhere else?
Murphy's Laws of Combat:
http://wilk4.com/humor/humorm113.htm
#47: No combat-ready unit has ever passed inspection.
zondaracer is offline  
Old 06-10-2008, 11:46 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WAFP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Freddy driver
Posts: 154
Default

Jumping on the "we're at war, why do we need an ORI" bandwagon...

My sq got a "Sat" on an ORI during a time that we were sending jets and people to the desert at the rate of 4/60 days and 1 jet every 3 months (small C-21 unit). We always got praise for how we handled the "actual" deployments, but never could quite get that silly ORI right?!?!

Oh yeah, I forgot that it's the ORI that counts, not your wartime mission!
WAFP is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 01:52 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoosePileit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: The IPA EB speaks for me
Posts: 520
Default

Thanks for the entertainment if not enlightenment! I like my Kool-aid mixed w/ Pure grain alcohol.... But it's time to step. Please don't confuse actual leadership lessons from the precious few that got it with support of the uniform nazis in the same post. The comment to the OG/CCs conference was about 3 years behind the power curve, that was peeing into a gale. Once the first 2 wings let it happen years ago, the inertia was set.
MoosePileit is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 02:44 AM
  #57  
Line Holder
 
capoetc's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 91
Default

Originally Posted by MoosePileit View Post
Thanks for the entertainment if not enlightenment! I like my Kool-aid mixed w/ Pure grain alcohol.... But it's time to step. Please don't confuse actual leadership lessons from the precious few that got it with support of the uniform nazis in the same post. The comment to the OG/CCs conference was about 3 years behind the power curve, that was peeing into a gale. Once the first 2 wings let it happen years ago, the inertia was set.
Well, I've officially had enough of this thread.

Incidentally, the precious few that got it that you refer to in your message? That guy, who was an OG/CC at the time, is now the Commander of TACC. Does the fact that you know that now make him an idiot in your eyes?

My point regarding uniform wear in the AOR is simply to say that there is a reason for it -- force protection. You may, of course, disagree with the rationale, but that is the reason -- not just to make your life difficult. It would be a heck of a lot easier to not stop somebody a couple times a week to correct their uniform wear.

Finally, does the fact that, in your opinion, addressing having an ORI during a war was "three years behind the power curve" make it not the right thing to do to address it?

If something is wrong, don't walk past it -- fix it. Or if you can't fix it yourself, come up with a viable solution and present it.

Or, just whine about it on a forum. That will probably accomplish much more.
capoetc is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 03:36 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 847
Default

Originally Posted by capoetc View Post

My point regarding uniform wear in the AOR is simply to say that there is a reason for it -- force protection. You may, of course, disagree with the rationale, but that is the reason -- not just to make your life difficult. It would be a heck of a lot easier to not stop somebody a couple times a week to correct their uniform wear.
First of all, it's not uniform wear in the "AOR," it's uniform wear at "Al Udeid or another perfectly safe compound" that could not by any stretch of the imagination be considered any more "hazardous" than going to a football game. Especially for the shoe clerks who don't fly.

...and the reason for the "uniform policy" isn't "force protection." It's to give CMSgts and small-picture "leaders" like yourself a reason to feel important, and fool yourselves into thinking you're contributing to GWOT by doing something...anything...however ridiculous it might actually be. Of course, your OPRs will say that you captured Saddam.

Next time I see a terrorist walking 50 feet on a round trip from the dorm to the caddy without a reflective belt at 0300, I'll let you know.

Until then, ask yourself how many good officers/leaders/pilots have left the service due to the rationalization and propagation of the unmitigated absurdity and lack of common sense that you have shared with us in your posts. That is the real "waste" story.
Spaceman Spliff is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 05:21 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoosePileit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: The IPA EB speaks for me
Posts: 520
Default

capotec- you don't get the last word. My crew votes you tool of the day. Enjoy flying space-a... not w/ us... You are flame bait, just too silly to know it. We're not whining- we see it like it is. you went a career and didn't? nah... Your just 'bating. Or in self-justifying denial/standy mode.

reedited After a good day's flight in field grade weather picking up more bugs on low levels than a harley on route 66-...

Better yet... C'mon on space A, we need your mentoring for comic relief. You earned the ride and we earned the laughs. We'll see what you have left to work with. You found this worthless forum of whiners and waste- that's a start.

About the deployed stuff...Sure you checked each uniform violator for a valid ID- those are as key as improperly worn uniforms? If not, you just taught the enemy how to look proper in uniform. Hope you didn't racially profile my bro's in uniform, improperly worn or not.... You pulled each ID from it's man purse or holder, made sure it was the real thing, matched the bearer physically and quizzed them on the data- right?...

TACC and leadership- you can pick good examples of leaders but of all the places to pull them from when the thread is on waste- holy cow- kettle, meet black. Sure, there are good folks there, just bad inertia.

What thing were you really good at as a Captain other than not separating? Maj? LtC? So, you stood up at a CC Conf and said EORIs during combat are dumb recently... Did you just find out they've been going on together for YEARS!? That's not much command of the big picture to just speak up now. They must have short fallen some mission affecting your cube...

Again, please don't run off- this entertainment may be free, but I feel my tax dollars at work paying your retirement check, just like yours paid for VSP checks.
MoosePileit is offline  
Old 06-11-2008, 06:05 AM
  #60  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Buzz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Sitting
Posts: 96
Default Ha!

Originally Posted by MJB68 View Post
Been doing this AF flying thing for more than 18 years now...both AD and ANG. Left AD because I burned out on seeing shlep rocks who checked all the right boxes and gave more of a SH!% about their careers than their people, get moved up the chain. Thank God someone has finally realized that the AF has an indemic problem with leadership...or more accurately...a complete absense thereof, and canned the "polyester prince" chief of staff and the "do nothing" secretary. But hey, the guard ain't no better. At least not my unit....No-sir-ee-bob!!! You want to talk fraud waste and abuse? Try for the last 6 months, we've turned back every mission, TDY, or deployment we could have helped out with to train for our ORI. Yes, the nation is at war, and all our brain trust can do is prepare for the fake war. We've spent tens of thousands of dollars on new patches for everyone, new headlamps for PAR teams that will NEVER BE USED, painting, posters, plasma screens.....and that doesn't even come close to all of the illegal airlift we've generated to go pick up inspectors at HQ and take them to different bases so we can shmooz them and see how other units do their inspections. Or the umpteen trips we've sent dozens of unit members on solely to over-the-shoulder the inspectors so we know how to prepare for our ORI. No, the active duty hasn't cornered the market on fraud waste and abuse....the guard has refined it to a level the mafia or Louisiana politicians would be proud of. I've reached the point where I'm just in it for mercenary reasons. If I weren't looking down the barrel of another furlough, I'd be a dot on the horizon. I'd love to list all of the corruption here, but fear I'd end up like vince foster.
This is exactly why I started this thread, laughable and sickening waste. I love the AF, my time in the AD and reserve has been fantastic. I have met some of the greatest people on this planet while serving (yes, even the Marines and Navy bros I worked with and hung out with at PSAB).

But, the way the AF flushes money down the toilet every single day, and then whines to Congress about needing more money for F-22s, C-17s, tankers, the E-10, etc... makes me sick.

Here's what I don't get, big picture, the DoD has the largest office building on Earth, the Pentagon, then they added on more office space via the Navy annex, Marine Corps annex, and extra AF offices in Crystal City. Then, on the AF side, we have the Maj Coms (yes more offices), ACC, AMC, USAFE, PACAF, and AETC. Then we have the Numbered Air Forces (more offices), the the individual wing HQs (more offices), then the Groups (more offices), THEN we have the squadrons that actually accomplish the AF mission. The amount of unbelievable waste throughout these layers of bureaucracy is mind boggling.

My 2nd story: September 5th of 2007, squadron secretary makes her way all over the squadron in a panic, "we have 2 days to spend $25,000, what new office furniture do you guys need." Being an astute observer of waste, I say, "why don't you write a check to the Army and mail it to them so they can buy more body armor or armor for Humvees." She smiled and went on her way soliciting others for their office furniture inputs. So, 2 weeks later, the squadron gets 30 new leather office chairs and several new desks that we do not need. Makes me sick to my stomach.
Buzz is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Deez340
Regional
160
05-06-2008 09:41 PM
ghilis101
Military
36
04-11-2008 06:09 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
26
03-03-2008 11:35 AM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 07:16 AM
Lbell911
Major
29
07-31-2007 05:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices