Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
AV-8B Harrier down in NC >

AV-8B Harrier down in NC

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

AV-8B Harrier down in NC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2009 | 11:01 AM
  #21  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

However until the accident report is released, it's all speculation...regardless of how logical the conclusion may seem or how much it seems to be "common knowledge." It is inappropriate for dudes who identify themselves as military pilots to speculate in public about the cause of a mishap. While this is a pilot forum, this is not the same as being in the ready room/squadron bar where you know exactly who you are/are not speculating to. And it's a complete foul to talk publicly about things like his currency...the presumption when that is brought up, especially by a another dude who identifies himself as a harrier pilot, is that his currency was a factor in the mishap. Again, that would be speculation.
Yes - it is speculation. And thus it should be viewed as such. There are certain things that should not be talked about and there are certain things that are OK to be talked about. For me - as long as priviledged information is not talked about then no rules are being broken. Some people's opinions might be tested and that is ok. If we were not to talk about any mishap until the final SIR was released, then we would actually be hurting safety - not improving it.
Miramar mishap for instance. We don't know what happened yet but there is speculation and we are already formulating NATOPS scenarios to train to a possibility.
If I say that he (MP) was an RP during CQ and was single engine and coming back from USS Boat - well that is ok. In my opinion - me talking on this forum about what decisions were made and why, or what specific failure(s) occurred would not be appropriate.

I'm with BDGERJMN on this one.
[/QUOTE]
That is ok......but let's keep any disagreement between members on this forum on a professional level and discuss any issue in a mature manner so we don't sound like the other forums.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 11:44 AM
  #22  
TBoneF15's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

dude you're missing the point.

Speculating, discussing, guessing, etc are FINE when it's with other military pilots in your BAR, or READY ROOM, or BRIEFING ROOM or SQUADRON or somewhere else not public.

Throwing out juicy tidbits like the currency of the mishap pilot, especially when they are qualified with the high confidence phrase "I heard...", on a PUBLIC INTERNET FORUM that, while interesting, prove nothing and only do a disservice to a deceased bro. If there was some information that has been discovered that was time critical to the rest of our safety, you'd have already heard it via official channels.

This kid is dead and it's a tragedy. It is unfair to him and his family to PUBLICLY post RUMORS, no matter how well founded, that lead any random dude who looks at this website to the conclusion that the crash was pilot error. That's exactly what has been done here.

Many accident investigations have looked cut and dry up front, but after digging they have found a much different cause then they thought they would. Who knows if this one will turn out that way or not.

I'm out.
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 10:54 PM
  #23  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by TBoneF15
dude you're missing the point.

Speculating, discussing, guessing, etc are FINE when it's with other military pilots in your BAR, or READY ROOM, or BRIEFING ROOM or SQUADRON or somewhere else not public.

Throwing out juicy tidbits like the currency of the mishap pilot, especially when they are qualified with the high confidence phrase "I heard...", on a PUBLIC INTERNET FORUM that, while interesting, prove nothing and only do a disservice to a deceased bro. If there was some information that has been discovered that was time critical to the rest of our safety, you'd have already heard it via official channels.

This kid is dead and it's a tragedy. It is unfair to him and his family to PUBLICLY post RUMORS, no matter how well founded, that lead any random dude who looks at this website to the conclusion that the crash was pilot error. That's exactly what has been done here.

Many accident investigations have looked cut and dry up front, but after digging they have found a much different cause then they thought they would. Who knows if this one will turn out that way or not.

I'm out.
No...I'm not missing the point. Maybe that one bit of his post wasn't good information to post - but were you talking about that one tidbit?

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 01-18-2009 | 08:48 AM
  #24  
TBoneF15's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

check your PM.
Reply
Old 01-19-2009 | 05:07 PM
  #25  
tjav8b's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TBoneF15
dude you're missing the point.

Speculating, discussing, guessing, etc are FINE when it's with other military pilots in your BAR, or READY ROOM, or BRIEFING ROOM or SQUADRON or somewhere else not public.

Throwing out juicy tidbits like the currency of the mishap pilot, especially when they are qualified with the high confidence phrase "I heard...", on a PUBLIC INTERNET FORUM that, while interesting, prove nothing and only do a disservice to a deceased bro. If there was some information that has been discovered that was time critical to the rest of our safety, you'd have already heard it via official channels.

This kid is dead and it's a tragedy. It is unfair to him and his family to PUBLICLY post RUMORS, no matter how well founded, that lead any random dude who looks at this website to the conclusion that the crash was pilot error. That's exactly what has been done here.

Many accident investigations have looked cut and dry up front, but after digging they have found a much different cause then they thought they would. Who knows if this one will turn out that way or not.

I'm out.
I could have posted alot more details about this accident as well as the Miramar accident but I haven't for the reasons you mentioned. I really feel like there is nothing else to discuss.
Reply
Old 01-19-2009 | 05:52 PM
  #26  
ImTumbleweed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Default

Gents,

I have to chime in.

I agree with TboneF15 and BDGERJMN on this issue.

As 'Bros, we lost a brother. We should not do him, or his FAMILY the dis-service of posting the details of his demise on a PUBLIC forum.

We can speculate and debate in person -- face to face, hopefully over a beer. This forum is not a Ready Room, not the O-club, and not a face to face conversation.

Think of his family-- If I was his father/mother/brother/ect, I would be crushed to learn that "he flew into the ground" by reading it here. This is not the place. Let the SIR work and let the CACO process work.

On my first tour we lost 3 Aviators in 41 days (my best friend one of them). I can't begin to tell you how much the family craves any information about the tragic event (even if the information is incorrect or specualtion). It hurts them-- WE hurt them.

Again, I ask we let the SIR and CACO process work.

Very Respectfully,

ImTumbleweed
"Afterburner is a great substitute for poor headwork"
Reply
Old 05-02-2009 | 07:45 AM
  #27  
tjav8b's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

SIR is out. PM me if you are interested.
Reply
Old 05-02-2009 | 01:41 PM
  #28  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

I'll bet my SIR is more interesting than your SIR >sigh<
Thanks for the heads-up. I'll take a look for it on Monday.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 05-02-2009 | 10:40 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

I'm late to the fight - but have to say I'm with BDGERJMN and T-Bone on this one. In less than ten years, I watched two squadron mates be buried and remember the immediate proceedings of the accidents - as if it were yesterday. I would never have considered discussing the accident on a public forum - no matter how public the information was. I definitely understand the need to debrief accidents, I think we all do. But, there is a time and place for that, especially if there is an immediate danger and need to discuss it amongst the affected drivers. That place is not here. Huge foul - this one seems pretty black and white.
Reply
Old 05-04-2009 | 11:08 AM
  #30  
Futureman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tjav8b
SIR is out. PM me if you are interested.
I also agree that this is not the place to discuss such things. You wouldn't want us airing your business. Would you Tommy?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fireman0174
Military
21
10-20-2008 08:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices