Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
USAF limited period rated officer recall prog >

USAF limited period rated officer recall prog

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

USAF limited period rated officer recall prog

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2011 | 05:25 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: 737 Right
Default

Kikuchiyo,

Please check your PM when able. Thanks.

Thunder1
Reply
Old 10-18-2011 | 08:06 AM
  #62  
KennHC130's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: HC-130P Instructor Pilot
Default

Thanks Kik
Reply
Old 11-07-2011 | 09:01 PM
  #63  
WarEagle28's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

I received the "Denied Extension" letter today. It clearly states 11F billets are still undermanned and those are the only billets they are approving.

Cheers,

WarE
Reply
Old 11-22-2011 | 10:01 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Ret AD, back to AA
Default

Originally Posted by Kikuchiyo

Also note that I said "on either RRORP or LPRP orders." Once an ARC member declares sanctuary, they are no longer considered to be in the LPRP program. They get new orders to AD, the rules change, and they are no longer limited by the 48-month maximum of the LPRP.
I just spoke to a friend who is with me in the LPRP program and has heard that sanctuary declarers will actually be staying within the LPRP program until their 20 yr retirement point. The LPRP office has said that this will end up being easier than putting folks back on regular active duty. One reason given was the pain of having to meet AD promotion boards...which is not required under the LPRP program.
Reply
Old 11-28-2011 | 11:46 AM
  #65  
Nebbie's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Ramen Noodles
Default

War Eagle, what was the exact routing that your package went through and who was the final authority in your denial? HQUSAF? Which directorate? Names? Are you a mobility guy?
Thanks
Reply
Old 11-30-2011 | 08:04 AM
  #66  
New Hire
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: USAF
Default

test message
Reply
Old 12-08-2011 | 07:16 AM
  #67  
WarEagle28's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Nebbie
War Eagle, what was the exact routing that your package went through and who was the final authority in your denial? HQUSAF? Which directorate? Names? Are you a mobility guy?
Thanks

I'm a recce guy, and it was disapproved at AFPC.

Sir, this e-mail and the attached letter (atch 1) serve as official
notification that your Recall Extension request, although strongly
considered was disapproved. The most pressing need for recall extensions at
this time is to provide 11F (Fighter Pilot) capability to augment the AD force.

Voluntary Officer Recall to Active Duty Section Officer Accessions Branch
DSN 665-2288 Comm (210) 565-2288
Reply
Old 03-19-2012 | 02:50 PM
  #68  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 25
Default

Kikuchiyo,

Have you or anyone else heard of the possibility of them running another limited recall program after this one expires for targeted AFSCs/specialties that the AF is critically manned in?

Thanks in advance,

Bunker
Reply
Old 03-19-2012 | 09:51 PM
  #69  
Kikuchiyo's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
Have you or anyone else heard of the possibility of them running another limited recall program after this one expires for targeted AFSCs/specialties that the AF is critically manned in?
No, in fact, they've ruled out the possibility for FY 12 for sure. FY 13 not likely, and beyond that, who can say.

The personelists that understand the issues that affect rated have to deal with the larger AF issues of being over end strength. As I've said before, it's very difficult for them to convince the corporate structure of the need to recall a bunch of non-promotable, non-PCS-able, retirement-eligible individuals when they're simultaneously kicking out upwardly mobile young guys.

In addition, the ARC felt like they got shafted by the last recall. It apparently wasn't fully coordinated with them beforehand. They lost a bunch of guys back to AD, many of whom will hit 20 yrs of AD time during their recall tour. They'll never go back to the ARC, which wasn't accounted for in the ARC's manning projections. It's likely that the ARC will push back on another round of recalls unless the AD side addresses their concerns better.

Of course, this is all likely to change by 2014 if the airlines really start hiring and the 10-yr pilot training ADSC guys all bail.
Reply
Old 03-20-2012 | 04:31 AM
  #70  
thrust's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by Kikuchiyo

Of course, this is all likely to change by 2014 if the airlines really start hiring and the 10-yr pilot training ADSC guys all bail.
Is AFPC doing anything to address this issue that's looming just beyond the horizon? Or are they taking the standard wait-and-see approach, before instituting knee-jerk policies like stop-loss and 20 year UPT ADSCs?

FWIW, I think a significant number will bail regardless of the status of airline hiring. People are pretty fed up.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Riddler
Military
969
08-04-2010 09:17 PM
usa3000go
Military
27
04-30-2008 05:32 PM
gcsass
Cargo
68
03-04-2008 08:33 AM
Micro
Cargo
42
07-19-2007 06:53 AM
Tech Maven
Hangar Talk
17
10-30-2006 10:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices