Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Cleared Pre Contact.... >

Cleared Pre Contact....

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Cleared Pre Contact....

Old 10-22-2012, 08:30 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 383
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e View Post
<looking around>

....are we on baseops?
Where's Rainman to commence the belittling?
surfnski is offline  
Old 10-23-2012, 02:22 AM
  #22  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: IPZ to Mr.
Posts: 1,915
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant View Post
This crap isn't hard. It's just the hardest thing that some mws's do.
You could also say that about a lot of stuff that is just admin to some MWSs.
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 10-23-2012, 05:36 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant View Post
You guys act like I haven't done this a few times. Please. I flew Buffs with no ailerons. This crap isn't hard. It's just the hardest thing that some mws's do.
The KC-135 and the B-52 -- A match made in the Armageddon of Mutually Assured Destruction!

Some days it just seemed that the Buff was designed to sit in pre-contact behind the KC-135.

CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 10-23-2012, 06:00 AM
  #24  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Difficulty, In Perspective

My first airline was Evergreen. We did our 747 training at United's Training Center, in the same sim (747-200) that the Air Force uses for the E-4B (Looking Glass/NAACP). My Evergreen IP was a retired Air Force E-4B pilot.

One day, we finished early and he told the Instructor Engineer working the sim panel "Hey, bring up the KC-135!" Sure enough, a KC-135R-model pops into view, one mile ahead. I was amazed at the sim detail; it even had the lower TACAN antenna that we used as a visual reference in the F-4.

He taxied in and plugged, took a few thousand pounds, and disconnected.

Knowing my background, he said (with a sly grin) "You've done this a few times....you try it."

At this point, I had somewhere between 700 and 800 air refuelings in the Phantom. I thought to myself "Well, it won't be pretty, but I can get on the boom."

I lost track of how many times I hit the tanker. The big differences were:

1. Throttle lag. The F-4 is turbojet; not much lag. JT-9Ds: lots of lag, and once the behemoth starts moving forward, lots of inertia.

2. Receptacle location. In the F-4, top of the fuselage, roughly over the aerodynamic center. It means when the nose is raised or lowered, the receptacle doesn't really move.

Receptacle in the 747: in front of the windscreen, about 100-120 feet in front of the aerodynamic center. Move the pitch half a degree? The receptacle just moved 1-foot vertically.

3. Inertia. Big airplanes have inertia in pitch, roll, and speed. Once started, hard to stop.

I had watched a KC-10 get refueled by a KC-135A on an ocean crossing once (I was in the F-4). I couldn't believe how much the -10 was moving, and I swear I could see the fuselage flexing.

I never did get a contact. I had a new respect for refueling a heavy.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 10-23-2012, 06:19 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
reCALcitrant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e View Post
You could also say that about a lot of stuff that is just admin to some MWSs.
You got it Hacker.
reCALcitrant is offline  
Old 10-23-2012, 06:57 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Vito's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757/767 Capt
Posts: 641
Default

ReCALcitrant,

I get your vibe about the "admin" aspect of AR to some airframes, but thats not what the discussion was about, B-52's seem like they are relatively stable behind the tanker. One ex-Buff IP posted a picture of a Buff doing a "whiff" manuever, it looked like he was in a 80 degree bank! Impressive! try doing that same manuever in the C-17 and you'll be in the newspapers the next day.
The conversation was about the difficulty of some airframes in AR not how difficult it is. C-141 = easy, C-17=not so much, B-52=easy I guess. SOLL II not so much, look it up, though Hacker15E may know about it too.
Take Care,
Vito
Vito is offline  
Old 10-23-2012, 07:56 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PittsDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 293
Default

I only have a bit over 1000 hours in the Buff, and I can tell you AR is not easy. Especially when you are on the boom for 20+ minutes to get a 100K onload. For us at least, AR was not admin. With anything else, a good Buff pilot behind the tanker will make it easy, however ask the boomers what a Buff looks like behind the boom on with a brand new Buff AC on upgrade ride #1 trying to hook up.
PittsDriver is offline  
Old 10-23-2012, 09:50 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tanker-driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 295
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant View Post
Are you kidding? I hope so.
Nope. Your attititude reeks of overconfidence and complacency. Please stay away from my tanker.
Tanker-driver is offline  
Old 10-23-2012, 03:58 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LowSlowT2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 484
Default

Appears the autopilot on the tanker kicked off...not sure the AWACS necessarily did anything wrong - hard to tell for sure.
LowSlowT2 is offline  
Old 10-23-2012, 05:10 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ftrooppilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Body at sea level; heart at 70,000+
Posts: 1,349
Default

Fifty years ago (this month) I was a B-52 Electronics Warfare Officer flying 24 hour 35 minutes Chrome Dome Missions during the Cuban Crisis. We would depart Westover AFB, fly across the Atlantic (no GPS - Celestial Navigation ), find a tanker over Spain, refuel, fly to the eastern Med and orbit for "HOURS" with four nuclear weapons ready for delivery. Departing orbit we would find another tanker over the Med and fly back to Westover. - thee times in ten days. Think about a night in flight refueling with pilots that have flown 65 hours in ten days and have been airborne for almost eighteen hours. Hundreds of missions were flown safely - a tribute to both the tanker and bomber crews.
Ftrooppilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Great Cornholio
Hangar Talk
15
07-20-2009 07:58 PM
HectorD
Pilot Health
19
05-20-2009 05:08 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
phantomflier
Major
68
01-28-2008 05:26 PM
jack
Cargo
3
04-11-2006 05:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices