Search
Notices
NetJets Fractional Operator

Leave Netjets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2017, 06:11 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
osuav8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by Out West View Post
What is WN?
WN is the IATA airline code for Southwest.
osuav8r is offline  
Old 04-02-2017, 07:22 AM
  #32  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 466
Default Leave Netjets?

Originally Posted by germanaviator View Post
I gotta ask: What's the point of the pics you keep posting? Do they add anything useful to the discussions? Yeah, the Phenom is kind of pretty but it is a very (!) uncomfortable work place. Tiny seats, no room to stretch your legs during flight, yoke hitting, kneecap, always a bent back while working in the cabin etc... So I kinda feel you are trying to make it look better than it is.



On a related note: I never did understand why pay on the least comfortable equipment should be lower than on more comfortable one.



I actually think it is only right that NetJets pays those on the light jet the same as those on the mid or large (I know about the long haul CPTs making more) and I actually think this should be the norm.



Yes, I know, more money is generally made with larger planes but this could be averaged out (a bit less for those on the heavy metal and a bit more for those on small stuff). Same is true for the airlines IMO


You don't like pictures?

Black and white sorta person?

Sorry... there's a big world out there... and also, I don't find the Phenom uncomfortable... but I'm 5'11". I'm in the jet as long as it takes to get out. No dilly. No dally.

Our pay is separated into two classes. Small Cabin and Large Cabin.

Large Cabin pays more. Lots more.

Cheers!!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FLYLOW22 is offline  
Old 04-02-2017, 07:28 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 466
Default Leave Netjets?

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan View Post
I don't have a dog in this fight. Never worked for Netjets, although I have many friends who do. I jumped from 121 to 91 corporate after 9/11 and back to 121 at SW a few years ago.

I'll say this, the grass always looks greener. Not everything that I had led myself to believe about WN ended up being true. It is a good job, but it isn't perfect, especially if you are junior and have young kids at home.

My advice to anyone looking to make the leap is to sit down with a WN pilot and talk with them about all of the little things beyond pay, retirement, and days off. Ask about flexibility to add, drop, or move flying or reserve days. Have young kids at home? Ask about how long before you can hold summer vacation. Ask about the cost of health insurance and how good the insurance is. Ask about lifestyle while on the road (hotel language, meals, etc) Ask what, if any, additional expenses must a pilot incur that are not reimbursed by the company. (Uniforms, bidding apps, parking, etc)

I think people tend to be blinded by pay, but they aren't realistic as to what it takes to get there. Yes, it is possible to exceed $100,000 at WN in year one, and $200,000 by year four or so. But that isn't just flying your line. The pilots making that kind of money are picking up extra flying and moving trips around to do as much of it as is possible. "Work smarter, not harder" is a thing... but only if you have the seniority horsepower to pull it off.

Personally, I like WN much more than I did flying corporate but there are a few things that I miss. Clean FBOs, warm cookies, crew cars, sleep rooms, expense accounts, keeping points, big chunks of time off.

So if you live in a WN base (other than ATL) and want to make the leap and you are an FO at NetJets, it's probably worth looking at. But take off the rose colored glasses, sit down with a WN pilot, and take pen to paper to write a pros/cons list to help you make as educated a decision as is possible.

That said, would love to see as many of you as is possible here, especially if you come to a Texas domicile! Maybe I could hold weekends off!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


So, in a nutshell...

It's not all and ?? It's just another job at WN? They just don't hand you money for nothing and s for free??

🤣🤣🤣


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FLYLOW22 is offline  
Old 04-02-2017, 07:31 AM
  #34  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 466
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer View Post
Very well said! The same goes for the folks who say the airlines are "a million dollar career." Well...it is...If you can stay lucky and remain healthy, fiscally sound, married, and be able to keep your medical. Nothing's guaranteed. Enjoy the Journey. Lots of youngsters on here who haven't lived through the several down times we've had.


Exactly... life on min guarantee because of $100/barrel will change perspective. And base. And equipment. And seat. And line holding status.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FLYLOW22 is offline  
Old 04-02-2017, 07:38 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,807
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan View Post
I don't have a dog in this fight. Never worked for Netjets, although I have many friends who do. I jumped from 121 to 91 corporate after 9/11 and back to 121 at SW a few years ago.

I'll say this, the grass always looks greener. Not everything that I had led myself to believe about WN ended up being true. It is a good job, but it isn't perfect, especially if you are junior and have young kids at home.

My advice to anyone looking to make the leap is to sit down with a WN pilot and talk with them about all of the little things beyond pay, retirement, and days off. Ask about flexibility to add, drop, or move flying or reserve days. Have young kids at home? Ask about how long before you can hold summer vacation. Ask about the cost of health insurance and how good the insurance is. Ask about lifestyle while on the road (hotel language, meals, etc) Ask what, if any, additional expenses must a pilot incur that are not reimbursed by the company. (Uniforms, bidding apps, parking, etc)

I think people tend to be blinded by pay, but they aren't realistic as to what it takes to get there. Yes, it is possible to exceed $100,000 at WN in year one, and $200,000 by year four or so. But that isn't just flying your line. The pilots making that kind of money are picking up extra flying and moving trips around to do as much of it as is possible. "Work smarter, not harder" is a thing... but only if you have the seniority horsepower to pull it off.

Personally, I like WN much more than I did flying corporate but there are a few things that I miss. Clean FBOs, warm cookies, crew cars, sleep rooms, expense accounts, keeping points, big chunks of time off.

So if you live in a WN base (other than ATL) and want to make the leap and you are an FO at NetJets, it's probably worth looking at. But take off the rose colored glasses, sit down with a WN pilot, and take pen to paper to write a pros/cons list to help you make as educated a decision as is possible.

That said, would love to see as many of you as is possible here, especially if you come to a Texas domicile! Maybe I could hold weekends off!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Probably one of the better posts I've read in a looong while.... Very balanced.

Everyone needs to do what's best for them and their family situation. Instinctively, l would say STAY if you are flying the Latitude instead of the XL... 😜

In the end, I think you will have to work hard at both jobs. I know pilots at both and they are among the hardest working people I know. Netjets is a min-rest operation these days and SWA folks work hard but can maximize their income in the process. My SWA friends are generally happy when they are not flying 4-5 hour flights in the 737. 😄

If I were in your position considering my own personal circumstances (likely different from yours), I would move over to SWA if I could move to a base that worked for me and my family - no commuting over the long term (maybe initially if required). Living in base is key for QOL and sanity. To recover lost income from leaving NJA, you will likely have to hussle for a few years but you will probably catch up relatively quick.

But having flown the XL at NJA, you are used to working hard!!!! Good luck!
David Puddy is offline  
Old 04-02-2017, 09:00 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Airplanes
Posts: 1,378
Default

I absolutely hated working for NetJets and what it entailed but if you aren't willing to move to a WN base then I'd stay put where you are. You're working 19 days a month? That is INSANE but you'd be working just as many trying to commute to base. All the benefits of airline flying go out the widow once you start commuting.

Good luck.
Macjet is offline  
Old 04-02-2017, 01:11 PM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Default

Originally Posted by FLYLOW22 View Post
Exactly... life on min guarantee because of $100/barrel will change perspective. And base. And equipment. And seat. And line holding status.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If gas goes up to 100/barrel that would put NetJets in the red. Everyone suffers, not just the airlines.
Jetlife is offline  
Old 04-02-2017, 01:38 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,383
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlife View Post
If gas goes up to 100/barrel that would put NetJets in the red. Everyone suffers, not just the airlines.


The difference is...the rich keep flying...the folks that use SWA and others would not.
Learflyer is offline  
Old 04-02-2017, 01:39 PM
  #39  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer View Post
The difference is...the rich keep flying...the folks that use SWA and others would not.
That isn't necessarily evidenced by past economic events. Think luxury versus necessity.
Jetlife is offline  
Old 04-02-2017, 02:33 PM
  #40  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,796
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer View Post
The difference is...the rich keep flying...the folks that use SWA and others would not.

I agree. In 08 my Fortune 500 employer flew even more as they tried to wring every last penny from the company stores and distribution centers. Discretionary spending at the airlines fell.

Maybe fewer trips to Aspen and Hilton Head, but more business travel overall.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SteveA
Cargo
48
04-24-2014 04:02 AM
hummingbear
Foreign
79
06-12-2010 05:56 PM
topgun
NetJets
46
09-08-2009 06:22 PM
UCLAbruins
Fractional
9
12-17-2007 07:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices