Silver Airways
07-15-2013, 07:35 AM
#3581
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,939
Originally Posted by EatMyPropwash
RAH had a class of 16 lined up for the Q400, a couple months ago, and 0 of 16 showed!!! <SHOCK> . Class of 4 started today at Silver for the Saab. Some guys have prior Saab experience, too.
07-15-2013, 12:04 PM
#3583
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: E-175 CA
Posts: 339
Originally Posted by tom11011
Saab captains or FO's?
07-15-2013, 02:32 PM
#3584
Respek
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,603
Originally Posted by What
So RAH can't staff them, and you are expecting Silver without the type on the certificate to acquire 30+ airplanes and staff them under your wages. Com'on man, as long as regionals with jets are hiring and pay more the sjs crowd will follow... We have hear many around here say why should I fly a t-prop when I have ATP mins.
07-15-2013, 03:05 PM
#3588
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 101
Originally Posted by Jamers
Maybe Republic will dump all of their Q400 flying so they can properly staff the new E-jets for United. Silver would be the next United Express Q400 operator.
07-15-2013, 04:19 PM
#3589
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 495
Originally Posted by Propspilot
RAH has no intentions on getting rid of the Q. United came to THEM and asked them to operate the Q. And the Q isnt covered under mainline scope so its possibilities for expansion are limitless.
07-15-2013, 07:56 PM
#3590
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 268
Originally Posted by EatMyPropwash
EDIT: Side note #2... How many street hire captains WON'T meet the 1000hr Part 121 time new requirement at Silver?
Read 121.436 - it becomes effective August 1, 2013. Bold added.
(a)(3) If serving as pilot in command, has 1,000 hours as second in command in operations under this part, pilot in command in operations under §91.1053(a)(2)(i) of this chapter, pilot in command in operations under §135.243(a)(1) of this chapter, or any combination thereof. For those pilots who are employed as pilot in command in part 121 operations on July 31, 2013, compliance with the requirements of this subparagraph is not required.
The interesting section is the following areas:
(b) No certificate holder may use nor may any pilot act as second in command unless the pilot holds an airline transport pilot certificate and an appropriate aircraft type rating for the aircraft being flown. A second-in-command type rating obtained under §61.55 does not satisfy the requirements of this section.
(d) Compliance with the requirements of this section is required by August 1, 2013. However, for those pilots who are employed as second in command in part 121 operations on July 31, 2013, compliance with the type rating requirement in paragraph (b) is not required until January 1, 2016.
With the new hires currently in class, do they fall under the currently employed or will they be required to have an appropriate type rating as they will not be qualified to act as second in command until after July 31?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
