Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Part 135
Key Lime Air's SIC to PIC program >

Key Lime Air's SIC to PIC program

Search
Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Key Lime Air's SIC to PIC program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2009, 11:57 AM
  #61  
Portuguese Troubleshooter
 
ImEbee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Burrito Bomber
Posts: 370
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh View Post
In some countries pilots are hired with zero flight time and are paid while gaining their initial certifications. Prior to getting hired with SWA pilots have to buy a type rating. Training contracts were common at regional airlines and are due to come back. Essentially pilots paid for their own training.

Exactly where should we as pilots draw the line? Why is it acceptable to pay for your own type rating to get a job but not for initial line experience?

Skyhigh
Originally Posted by SkyHigh View Post
What is the difference between that and buying time as a crew member? Pay to play keeps the dream alive if nothing else. In the end we all have to pay.

Skyhigh
Something tells me you are simply trying to get under the skin of many of us if you really can't differentiate between taking a Seminole out for a day with a couple of buddies or your girlfriend and paying a company to be an employee. Can you give me an expample in any other industry where this is acceptable?

As far as training contracts and type ratings are concerned, the fact is that as soon as you sit down in the pilots seat (including IOE) YOU are earning the money, not the company you are flying for. And yes I can hear you making the argument that training contracts are the same as paying for training, but everyone who enters into a training contract knows prior to beginning training the conditions of the obligations to that contract. It still doesn't change, promisary note or not, you will still receive a paycheck for the duties you are performing.

Originally Posted by Plantation Air View Post
Sky,

You're spot on man. I'd like to inquire as to the number of folks out there right now that are instructing and what their prospects are? As far as I can tell, no one is hiring pilots without 3k plus hours (and a motherload of that needs to be twin time). I could certainly be wrong, but with 1200 tt and 150 me, I have submitted over 300 resumes and recieved *******all.
Plantaition, I'm not making any judgements about your abitities necessarily but does it concern you that a company is willing to put any warm body with a fist full of cash into a postion that expects at least a minor responsibility to their operation? I know its hard to hear everyone tell you you are making the wrong descision but just think ahead when you are actually getting compensated to do a job (most likely poorly). How might you feel when you see someone willing to do your job for less than free? And as you are trying to impove the conditions and wage of your profession, how might you perceive those that are willing to do your job out of pocket and how do you think that could affect your efforts?
ImEbee is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 12:28 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by ImEbee View Post
Can you give me an expample in any other industry where this is acceptable?
Student teachers.
own nav is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 12:53 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 450
Default

Originally Posted by own nav View Post
So, I'm supposed to answer a hypothetical with a hypothetical?
It's not a hypothetical. We do hire an pay an FO to sit in that seat and the boss-man is considering selling it instead.

Care to answer or are you still interested in tap dancing around the question? I just want to see where the line is drawn.

Why do they have that FO there anyway (insurance reasons maybe)?
"The passengers don't like seeing an empty seat."
- Bossman

I don't buy it. Most of the time I get "oh there's two pilots today?", but it isn't my call, plus my FO is a good guy so I don't mind having the extra set of hands and eyes.

If that's the case, how would having a paying FO lower insurance costs?
We're insured and "dispatched" single pilot, the SIC is listed as a passenger...so, no it doesn't affect insurance.

Did it ever occur to you that paying FO's are considered a liability?
Yes.

For that matter, to respond to the other post, do you realize that ours is not the only profession where student workers pay their mentors for the sake of liability?
Yes.

-mini
minitour is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 01:09 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FL450's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Thrill Seat
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh View Post
You sound like a guy who is stuck as a CFI. I have noticed that instructors are the ones who seem to be the most alarmed by others buying a job to get ahead. So, Are you?

Another thing, Your instructor might have had a fast transition a few years ago but pilots now will have to struggle for a long time to get anyplace. In hard times often pilots have to make their own luck. $$$


Skyhigh
Sorry Sky but like you I moved on past instructing years ago but if I had to I would go back.. I've been flying 135 for quite some time and known guys who used to fly for key lime and they wouldn't let their worst enemy fly for this outfit!
FL450 is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 01:14 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FL450's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Thrill Seat
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by Plantation Air View Post
Sky,

You're spot on man. I'd like to inquire as to the number of folks out there right now that are instructing and what their prospects are? As far as I can tell, no one is hiring pilots without 3k plus hours (and a motherload of that needs to be twin time). I could certainly be wrong, but with 1200 tt and 150 me, I have submitted over 300 resumes and recieved *******all.
There are plenty of jobs out there right now it may not seem like it but the availability of jobs keeps increasing in aviation by the week. The main thing is persistence and who you know, its easy to get in a slump. Like you I was out of work for a few months however I networked and made my face known at every outlet available. When I did get called and hired at my current employer it was because of my persistence in following up with emails to the D.O. I wasn't bugging him but an email so often letting the employer know that you want a chance to become part of their company helps. I wish you the best of luck at key lime just keep the dirty side down!
FL450 is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 01:42 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 450
Default

Originally Posted by FL450 View Post
There are plenty of jobs out there right now...
This.

-mini
minitour is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 01:49 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by minitour View Post
It's not a hypothetical. We do hire an pay an FO to sit in that seat and the boss-man is considering selling it instead.

Care to answer or are you still interested in tap dancing around the question? I just want to see where the line is drawn.


"The passengers don't like seeing an empty seat."
- Bossman

I don't buy it. Most of the time I get "oh there's two pilots today?", but it isn't my call, plus my FO is a good guy so I don't mind having the extra set of hands and eyes.


We're insured and "dispatched" single pilot, the SIC is listed as a passenger...so, no it doesn't affect insurance.


-mini
My bad, you're right, I misunderstood you. Are we still talking about Key Lime? Or someone else?

My company does both pax and cargo, but you'd never see a paying FO on the pax planes.

What can I say? I guess you have to ask "if no one payed, would the boss still hire someone?" That's where I'd have to draw a firm line. Sounds to me like you can fly just fine without them FWIW. But an outright replacement of a hired FO with a paying one, no I don't agree with it.

To tell you the truth, I haven't had an FO at my base for several months, but no one has seemed to notice. It reconfirms my belief that it's not something the company is dependent upon to turn a profit.
own nav is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 04:32 PM
  #68  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 45
Default

Originally Posted by own nav View Post
My bad, you're right, I misunderstood you. Are we still talking about Key Lime? Or someone else?

My company does both pax and cargo, but you'd never see a paying FO on the pax planes.

What can I say? I guess you have to ask "if no one payed, would the boss still hire someone?" That's where I'd have to draw a firm line. Sounds to me like you can fly just fine without them FWIW. But an outright replacement of a hired FO with a paying one, no I don't agree with it.

To tell you the truth, I haven't had an FO at my base for several months, but no one has seemed to notice. It reconfirms my belief that it's not something the company is dependent upon to turn a profit.
Nav,

I agree with you on that point. Wouldn't more cmpanies be doing it if it were a major source of income and something they had to rely on? From what I've seen, Key Lime is one of only a handful that has a program like this.
Plantation Air is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 06:31 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 59
Default

I would imagine most other companies have a vested interest in maintaining their reputations. As you've seen here the majority of professional pilots hold Key Lime in general and these types of programs in particular in pretty low regard. It simply isn't worth it to them to compromise an image that takes years upon years to build.
miller is offline  
Old 11-30-2009, 09:38 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ZBowFlyz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 251
Default

Originally Posted by Plantation Air View Post
Nav,

I agree with you on that point. Wouldn't more cmpanies be doing it if it were a major source of income and something they had to rely on? From what I've seen, Key Lime is one of only a handful that has a program like this.
Only the true "Bottom Feeders"
ZBowFlyz is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wmuflyboy
Flight Schools and Training
30
03-26-2023 06:18 PM
barefootsailing
Part 135
10
01-12-2010 12:25 PM
JeepDrowner
Regional
85
10-03-2009 05:18 AM
atpwannabe
Aviation Law
22
09-11-2009 06:29 PM
myflatsix
Aviation Law
15
12-14-2008 07:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices