Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Part 135
Ameriflight etc vs. 121 world >

Ameriflight etc vs. 121 world

Search
Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Ameriflight etc vs. 121 world

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2012, 10:58 AM
  #281  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by SWAblue View Post
Considering the size of AMF, this is not that impressive of a number.

And safety records are only good until today. Then it starts all over again.
I can't believe I have to point out the obvious on this one, but really???!! The whole point of giving the statistic in hours is to negate the size of the operation so you can do apples to apples comparisons.

If I'm not mistaken, the number old dog gave is five times the industry average for single pilot freight.
own nav is offline  
Old 02-17-2012, 01:24 PM
  #282  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 112
Default

Originally Posted by own nav View Post
I can't believe I have to point out the obvious on this one, but really???!! The whole point of giving the statistic in hours is to negate the size of the operation so you can do apples to apples comparisons.

If I'm not mistaken, the number old dog gave is five times the industry average for single pilot freight.
You are right. You did not have to point out that fact.

But it appears I need to explain the obvious to you. Any safety record is only as good as its last flight. And pointing out markers to determine safety as in the chances may be only 1 in 500 that you may lose your life is not something to be happy about.

I did my gig hauling freight in Navahos for a time. I know how challenging those conditions may be. I don't think its wise to point out how good we are by how few deaths we have had.
SWAblue is offline  
Old 02-21-2012, 10:34 AM
  #283  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
Default

It would be obvious if I accepted your assumption that Ameriflight is the same old company with the same old risks just on a lucky streak.

I don't.
own nav is offline  
Old 02-21-2012, 01:17 PM
  #284  
Gets Weekends Off
 
freightdog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 'Bus Driver Right Seat
Posts: 523
Default

Originally Posted by own nav View Post
It would be obvious if I accepted your assumption that Ameriflight is the same old company with the same old risks just on a lucky streak.

I don't.
No lucky streaks here, with improvements in our training across all fleet types and weeding out pilots not up to par; we are proactively trying to keep those safe flying hours up.

For example, we just finished totally revamping the Metroliner training program, flows, SOP, and checklists that will make this aircraft all that much more efficient and safer to fly by reducing workloads as critical times.
freightdog is offline  
Old 02-21-2012, 01:23 PM
  #285  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 949
Default

AMF hiring still?
DirectTo is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 06:19 AM
  #286  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by freightdog View Post
No lucky streaks here, with improvements in our training across all fleet types and weeding out pilots not up to par; we are proactively trying to keep those safe flying hours up.

For example, we just finished totally revamping the Metroliner training program, flows, SOP, and checklists that will make this aircraft all that much more efficient and safer to fly by reducing workloads as critical times.
Exactly, and that's just upper managment and the training department's contribution.

Add to that, the effects of a prolonged recession on the experience level of our pilot group. There's no doubt the new guys coming in have been much more experienced, and the senior guys are slower to leave.

Add to that less late-night runs, fewer small aircraft types (Lances, 402's, many navajo's have been or are being grounded).

I could keep going, but I'd be mostly talking about stuff I've been impressed with at my own base and can't speak for AMF as a whole.
own nav is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 08:56 AM
  #287  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 112
Default

deleted due to formatting
SWAblue is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 09:04 AM
  #288  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 112
Default

Originally Posted by own nav View Post
It would be obvious if I accepted your assumption that Ameriflight is the same old company with the same old risks just on a lucky streak.

I don't.
I have no idea how you have picked up on any assumptions I may or may not have. You clearly are missing the point due to the clouding of your comprehension with your own assumptions.

Congratulations on your companies efforts to helping provide a better safety record for its pilots.
SWAblue is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 09:56 AM
  #289  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 112
Default

The topic of this thread has earned my interest and I thought I could give some perspective that I have with my experiences.

I have worked for seven airlines of which I have experience interviewing with some of them including Southwest. I was on the interview team for several years in the last decade.

Pilot qualifications of who gets hired at airlines are very fluid with time. When the Legacy and Major airlines are in a large hiring mode, the qualifications of those hired are lower in that time frame. When the hiring slows down, the qualifications increase. Simple supply and demand issues. We did hire a few AMF pilots while I was on the team. At that time all the airlines were hiring and our min qualifications have always been higher than the others. For the time being, those times have changed.

There will always be exceptions, but as setting career goals and making choices towards those, if your goal is to work for a major airline, I would strongly consider trying to work for a regional that use RJs. When you are competing for a position and you have single pilot part 135 experience compared to someone else who has PIC part 121 experience, the edge will go to the part 121 experience. That part 121 experience does show in the interview process.

Now there can be the consideration of getting the 1000 hours PIC time at AMF and then get on to a Regional to get 121 experience as an FO while still qualifying for the good jobs out there. Although putting yourself in a more competitive position than not working for a 121 carrier, it does not make a large difference when you consider the pool of applicants today.

With all this said, as I earlier shared, there are exceptions. That exception is the "who you know" that most of us all are very well aware is important. Some candidates may personally know a Chief Pilot, or a respected line pilot or check airman, and that can help you get to the interview that you may not have been considered. I personally know Southwest HEAVILY relies on the pilot recommendation system that is in place. They post all the incoming interviewees for our pilots to see so they can easily write a recommend, or a not recommend (I will touch on this a bit later) online. A casual acquaintance will not get any preferential treatment. It must be an established, natural relationship so jumpseating around being a really nice guy won't get you anywhere. If any AMF pilots are getting good major jobs in this environment it is likely due to connections they had before they worked at AMF. I personally, as well as most of my co-workers, take the recommendation process seriously as it should.

Now I will address the "not recommends". We all know there are some out there that would not be good employees or co-workers. It is just life. Now it is difficult to be in such a dynamic environment without ruffling up a few feathers out there. Everybody including hiring departments get that. But how did you manage those differences? At Southwest if a candidate that interviewed well gets approval from the interview team for hire has a negative recommendation, they will call the person who gave the "not recommend" and get more information. If they deem it PURELY a personal difference then they MAY look past that. It has been done. But you really don't want to go that far and have it go down that road. The bottom line is try your best not to be unfair to anyone along your path. Take the high road with disagreement. Smooth it over before you leave. As the saying goes, "Don't burn any bridges" in this business. It is a smaller profession than one may think. If you screwed anyone over, or even if someone thinks you did, (who cares about the truth in this matter) and you want to work for an airline they are employed, you will be at a disadvantage. The real point is don't find yourself in that position. You don't have to. Leave ALL relationships with a positive future in mind. Try not to let your pride get in the way of a very rewarding career.
SWAblue is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 07:07 PM
  #290  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 174
Default Thank You SWAblue

SWAblue, THANK YOU! for taking the time to type up your perspective. Very informative. It will be useful for my next career decision.
AF2Navy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sir James
Major
5
03-04-2006 03:31 PM
WhiskyPilot
Major
17
01-31-2006 05:25 PM
Sasquatch
Cargo
1
12-27-2005 01:20 AM
RockBottom
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 02:15 PM
Freight Dog
Major
0
04-28-2005 07:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices