The DiverDriver Thread
#91
New Hire
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Hmm low time idiots, huh?
Those supposed idiots went straight from a 172 to a multi turbine aircraft and finished training in less than a month. Sounds like someone who might be a half decent pilot and know what they’re doing if you ask me. And those beloved high time pilots you keep talking about, guess what? Those are the same guys that get in the plane and have to ask “the lowtime idiots” how to start the engines. Also, the high time guys, including the one that went on to fly “heavy equipment”, were actually restricted to flying only certain assignments (whether they know that or not) because they couldn’t handle the demands of some of the military groups. No aircraft accidents at SDAZ either, but they’re low time idiots, correct?
As far as the contract goes, yes, pay was known before signing the contract. However, pilots are required to train new hires, and if they don’t will lose work. Nowhere in the contract does it mention having to train new pilots coming in the door. A lot of SDAZ pilots have kids and families to provide for, and cannot afford to lose work. And in return 75% of their flying will be training people, which they never agreed to. So you can’t necessarily blame them for not honoring a dishonorable contract.
Those supposed idiots went straight from a 172 to a multi turbine aircraft and finished training in less than a month. Sounds like someone who might be a half decent pilot and know what they’re doing if you ask me. And those beloved high time pilots you keep talking about, guess what? Those are the same guys that get in the plane and have to ask “the lowtime idiots” how to start the engines. Also, the high time guys, including the one that went on to fly “heavy equipment”, were actually restricted to flying only certain assignments (whether they know that or not) because they couldn’t handle the demands of some of the military groups. No aircraft accidents at SDAZ either, but they’re low time idiots, correct?
As far as the contract goes, yes, pay was known before signing the contract. However, pilots are required to train new hires, and if they don’t will lose work. Nowhere in the contract does it mention having to train new pilots coming in the door. A lot of SDAZ pilots have kids and families to provide for, and cannot afford to lose work. And in return 75% of their flying will be training people, which they never agreed to. So you can’t necessarily blame them for not honoring a dishonorable contract.
#92
Disinterested Third Party
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
Interesting that most all the whiners have one or two posts and are appearing out of the woodwork, including some who have worked there, but have been quoted a year ago with a very different song to sing.
The pilots mostly all have families to feed? No. Most are young guys doing their first job.
Losing money because they're training others? No.
No idea what an opportunity they have, no idea how good they have it or what it's really like to pay dues to get somewhere in the business...the entitlement generation steps into turbine equipment with a wet commercial and cries that it's not good enough. Typical.
The pilots mostly all have families to feed? No. Most are young guys doing their first job.
Losing money because they're training others? No.
No idea what an opportunity they have, no idea how good they have it or what it's really like to pay dues to get somewhere in the business...the entitlement generation steps into turbine equipment with a wet commercial and cries that it's not good enough. Typical.
#93
The "young pilots" are grown up professionals, at least that's what they're supposed to be. Don't sign a contract you are not happy with.
Both are equally slimy in this situation. "very manipulated dishonest situation", I'm pretty sure they knew 100% what the contract said before signing it, but the words "multi turbine PIC" prevented them from thinking clearly.
Clearly a scumbag operator. But I don't give much credit to the pilots who break a contract and then complain when company comes after them for it.
"bullying them", come on. Grow a pair, you're a pilot. Say no, go elsewhere. It's not 2008 any more, jobs are everywhere.
I'm working for a great company at the moment. I signed a contract, and I plan to work it. If something happens and I can't, I pay my share. It's not hard.
Both are equally slimy in this situation. "very manipulated dishonest situation", I'm pretty sure they knew 100% what the contract said before signing it, but the words "multi turbine PIC" prevented them from thinking clearly.
Clearly a scumbag operator. But I don't give much credit to the pilots who break a contract and then complain when company comes after them for it.
"bullying them", come on. Grow a pair, you're a pilot. Say no, go elsewhere. It's not 2008 any more, jobs are everywhere.
I'm working for a great company at the moment. I signed a contract, and I plan to work it. If something happens and I can't, I pay my share. It's not hard.
like **** is not professional and your business is gonna have a high turnover rate.
#95
In a land of unicorns
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 104
From: Whale FO
Alright smarty pants. You must understand and know what all legal jargon means then? So you could translate any contract and know 1000% the conditions and stipulations? MY main point here is that these EMPLOYERS are treating these INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS as EMPLOYEES. THAT'S SLIMY. But it's the Pilot's fault for that right? Since they probably signed the contract for being an independent contractor and are wondering why they're being treated as an employee. Gotta scam hard working people for the companies benefit. Ka-ching Ka-ching. Treating your EMPLOYEE (S) (oops I mean Independent Contractor)
like **** is not professional and your business is gonna have a high turnover rate.
like **** is not professional and your business is gonna have a high turnover rate.And I already said it's slimy from the company. I hate employee abuse such as that. But it's lame for the employees/contractors to complain when they come after you for a training bond that you signed. You knew you'll be a 1099 when you signed up. If you didn't understand what it means, well, maybe you shouldn't sign documents that you don't understand.
If you'd do your homework, you'd find a very easy way to get rid of a "bond" as a 1099. "Quitting" is stupid.
#96
New Hire
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Hmm low time idiots, huh?
Those supposed idiots went straight from a 172 to a multi turbine aircraft and finished training in less than a month. Sounds like someone who might be a half decent pilot and know what they’re doing if you ask me. And those beloved high time pilots you keep talking about, guess what? Those are the same guys that get in the plane and have to ask “the lowtime idiots” how to start the engines. Also, the high time guys, including the one that went on to fly “heavy equipment”, were actually restricted to flying only certain assignments (whether they know that or not) because they couldn’t handle the demands of some of the military groups. No aircraft accidents at SDAZ either, but they’re low time idiots, correct?
As far as the contract goes, yes, pay was known before signing the contract. However, pilots are required to train new hires, and if they don’t will lose work. Nowhere in the contract does it mention having to train new pilots coming in the door. A lot of SDAZ pilots have kids and families to provide for, and cannot afford to lose work. And in return 75% of their flying will be training people, which they never agreed to. So you can’t necessarily blame them for not honoring a dishonorable contract.
Those supposed idiots went straight from a 172 to a multi turbine aircraft and finished training in less than a month. Sounds like someone who might be a half decent pilot and know what they’re doing if you ask me. And those beloved high time pilots you keep talking about, guess what? Those are the same guys that get in the plane and have to ask “the lowtime idiots” how to start the engines. Also, the high time guys, including the one that went on to fly “heavy equipment”, were actually restricted to flying only certain assignments (whether they know that or not) because they couldn’t handle the demands of some of the military groups. No aircraft accidents at SDAZ either, but they’re low time idiots, correct?
As far as the contract goes, yes, pay was known before signing the contract. However, pilots are required to train new hires, and if they don’t will lose work. Nowhere in the contract does it mention having to train new pilots coming in the door. A lot of SDAZ pilots have kids and families to provide for, and cannot afford to lose work. And in return 75% of their flying will be training people, which they never agreed to. So you can’t necessarily blame them for not honoring a dishonorable contract.
You had sub 500 hour pilots brand new to multi engine turbine aircraft teaching OTHER sub 500 hour pilots? With no other oversight? And you were not compensated for the additional responsibility?
#97
Interesting that most all the whiners have one or two posts and are appearing out of the woodwork, including some who have worked there, but have been quoted a year ago with a very different song to sing.
The pilots mostly all have families to feed? No. Most are young guys doing their first job.
Losing money because they're training others? No.
No idea what an opportunity they have, no idea how good they have it or what it's really like to pay dues to get somewhere in the business...the entitlement generation steps into turbine equipment with a wet commercial and cries that it's not good enough. Typical.
The pilots mostly all have families to feed? No. Most are young guys doing their first job.
Losing money because they're training others? No.
No idea what an opportunity they have, no idea how good they have it or what it's really like to pay dues to get somewhere in the business...the entitlement generation steps into turbine equipment with a wet commercial and cries that it's not good enough. Typical.
#98
New Hire
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Interesting that most all the whiners have one or two posts and are appearing out of the woodwork, including some who have worked there, but have been quoted a year ago with a very different song to sing.
The pilots mostly all have families to feed? No. Most are young guys doing their first job.
Losing money because they're training others? No.
No idea what an opportunity they have, no idea how good they have it or what it's really like to pay dues to get somewhere in the business...the entitlement generation steps into turbine equipment with a wet commercial and cries that it's not good enough. Typical.
The pilots mostly all have families to feed? No. Most are young guys doing their first job.
Losing money because they're training others? No.
No idea what an opportunity they have, no idea how good they have it or what it's really like to pay dues to get somewhere in the business...the entitlement generation steps into turbine equipment with a wet commercial and cries that it's not good enough. Typical.
The second statement that needs correction is that they lost money training. No one on this forum stated that. You twisted his words. Go back and read it carefully and you will find that he said that if you refused to train then you were not given the same flight hours as those that were willing to train. Hence the loss in pay because you’d be flying less days.
The next statement that needs further information is that you continue to bully the younger pilots that are low time and often straight out of receiving their commercial ratings. Those very same pilots worked hard and safely flew the groups and jumpers. They are the ones that dealt with engine explosions, wheels falling off, and major oil leaks in the engines that started a fire and yet they all landed safely with no one getting hurt. Hours mean nothing if we are going off what you have said. The highly experienced pilot with much higher hours is the one that made a very rookie mistake and starved his engines of fuel. Even yourself that has thousands of hours required additional training on the skyvan from low time wet commercial pilots.
And your final statement that is true but needs some further light to explain it is that you are right. You never worked for skydive Arizona. None of us did. You worked as a mechanic for AeroSpecialists, when you flew the only groups that you were allowed to fly your check came from Ariborne Support Group, and the pilots that flew the fun jumpers received their paychecks from Para Drop Corp. Skydive Arizona is a fancy name with multiple companies underneath it d.b.a Skydive Arizona. If anyone wants to have fun and see what I mean look up the registration of the Skyvans and Otters and look at how many different companies it has been registered to. I’ll spoil the surprise and let you know that any company based in Arizona or Montana is all the same. It’s a game of moving assets around to avoid liability. So though your statements were not false - you knowingly tried to lead the readers of this forum atstray making it appear as though you were a non bias outside observer and you are not.
#99
New Hire
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Yes. I know the difference between 1099 and W2. If you don't, you should find out. If you didn't, it's 100% your fault.
And I already said it's slimy from the company. I hate employee abuse such as that. But it's lame for the employees/contractors to complain when they come after you for a training bond that you signed. You knew you'll be a 1099 when you signed up. If you didn't understand what it means, well, maybe you shouldn't sign documents that you don't understand.
If you'd do your homework, you'd find a very easy way to get rid of a "bond" as a 1099. "Quitting" is stupid.
And I already said it's slimy from the company. I hate employee abuse such as that. But it's lame for the employees/contractors to complain when they come after you for a training bond that you signed. You knew you'll be a 1099 when you signed up. If you didn't understand what it means, well, maybe you shouldn't sign documents that you don't understand.
If you'd do your homework, you'd find a very easy way to get rid of a "bond" as a 1099. "Quitting" is stupid.
Those same pilots that never signed a contract are in the group that received letters from an attorney saying that legal action was going to be taken. When one of those pilots called the attorneys office asking why he received the threatening letter because he never signed a contract the attorney’s reply was that he wasn’t aware a contract was never signed. He sent out the letters because the owners of the drop zone called and asked him to. He sent out letters threatening legal action without having any proof of an agreement. That seems very unprofessional and unethical. As are the actions of the company that is trying to threaten and scare the pilots that never signed a contract.
#100
New Hire
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Most of those pilots that were training never even got their CFI, MEI, or CFII.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



