Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Pilot Health
FAA Looking at VA Records (Indictments!) >

FAA Looking at VA Records (Indictments!)

Search

Notices
Pilot Health FAA medical; health topics

FAA Looking at VA Records (Indictments!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2018 | 03:24 PM
  #151  
rickair7777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,115
Likes: 795
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

The AF stated their intent was voluntary recalls only, although the authorization was not limited to that.

After decades in the Navy I've seen only a couple retiree recalls, a couple seals, a couple nuke submariners, and a guy who was the only guy qualified to service a complex piece of medical gear.
Reply
Old 09-23-2018 | 09:45 PM
  #152  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,241
Likes: 256
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The AF stated their intent was voluntary recalls only, although the authorization was not limited to that.

After decades in the Navy I've seen only a couple retiree recalls, a couple seals, a couple nuke submariners, and a guy who was the only guy qualified to service a complex piece of medical gear.

Likely? Not unless there is a general mobilization, but possible? Oh yes.



Anyone intending to join the military - especially to accept a Regular commission, at least ought to be aware of the rules. Google this and it will send you to a PDF:


DOD Directive 1352.1 - Management and Mobilization of Regular and Reserve Retired Military Members
Reply
Old 09-24-2018 | 02:26 AM
  #153  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Default

There are zero involuntary retired recalls. Throw the letter in the trash. Those guys all wanted to come back.
Reply
Old 09-25-2018 | 08:03 AM
  #154  
Han Solo's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
From: Fastest Hunk of Junk in the Galaxy
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The AF stated their intent was voluntary recalls only, although the authorization was not limited to that.

After decades in the Navy I've seen only a couple retiree recalls, a couple seals, a couple nuke submariners, and a guy who was the only guy qualified to service a complex piece of medical gear.
I wasn't that great of an officer when I (kind of) wanted to be there, I can only imagine how much my boss' life would suck if I was recalled involuntarily (probably just a little less than mine).

Last edited by Han Solo; 09-25-2018 at 08:20 AM.
Reply
Old 09-25-2018 | 02:49 PM
  #155  
rickair7777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,115
Likes: 795
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Likely? Not unless there is a general mobilization, but possible? Oh yes.



Anyone intending to join the military - especially to accept a Regular commission, at least ought to be aware of the rules. Google this and it will send you to a PDF:


DOD Directive 1352.1 - Management and Mobilization of Regular and Reserve Retired Military Members
If there's a general mob, anyone who's fresh enough off of AD to be of interest to the government will probably be needing a job anyhow... something like that would be worth at least a 20% across the board airline furlough.
Reply
Old 10-01-2018 | 07:17 AM
  #156  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

That’s funny and a great way to look at it....Place me in the same category.
Reply
Old 11-02-2018 | 07:38 PM
  #157  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
To tag on, PDRit, I’ve been a SQ/DO and Group Commander and never refused an employer’s request for verification of duty. I’ve taken calls from employers and issued LOR for one dude who thought he could use his unit as a way out of working. I was the DO when another officer thought using sick leave from his airline was OK to be on man-days. When caught, he was fired from the airline and discharged sans retirement from the military. There were aggravating circumstances, but that’s the gist of it.

No, honor is required and expected, as are flight skills. I’ve also participated in three Flying Evaluation Boards for flying deficiencies. Off came the wings for two of them.



Gf
I hope you’re proud of yourself! You sound like you have a solid record of screwing people, right or wrong.
Reply
Old 11-02-2018 | 08:51 PM
  #158  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,241
Likes: 256
Default

Originally Posted by Big C
I hope you’re proud of yourself! You sound like you have a solid record of screwing people, right or wrong.
You expect a certain standard of integrity in the military. If the person doesn't have that, you don't want them on your wing - or with access to weapons and munitions designed to break things and kill people. It's as simple as that.

If you can't understand that the problem is you, not galaxy flyer living up to the standards required of an organization commander.
Reply
Old 11-03-2018 | 05:20 PM
  #159  
rickair7777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,115
Likes: 795
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Big C
I hope you’re proud of yourself! You sound like you have a solid record of screwing people, right or wrong.
Sounds to me like he did the right thing. The military is not some kind of mafia which protects it's own at all costs
Reply
Old 11-03-2018 | 09:50 PM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Big C
I hope you’re proud of yourself! You sound like you have a solid record of screwing people, right or wrong.

So what would be your expectations that he do when one of the guys under his command tells his employer that he has guard/reserve duty to get out of work, when there actually was no duty, and that employer calls him to verify the duty?



It *sounds* like you'd expect him to lie, and tell the employer that the guy did have duty, but I could be misunderstanding you, so thought I'd ask you and let you explain what you meant.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AirBear
American
8
07-18-2018 04:03 AM
Bilsch
Aviation Law
1
03-16-2017 03:22 AM
westwind1
Aviation Law
86
12-25-2015 02:18 PM
SayAlt
Major
51
05-29-2015 06:57 AM
FEtrip7
Cargo
41
02-16-2012 02:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices