Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Pilot Health
Sleep Apnea-new FAA Guidelines - be prepared! >

Sleep Apnea-new FAA Guidelines - be prepared!

Search
Notices
Pilot Health FAA medical; health topics

Sleep Apnea-new FAA Guidelines - be prepared!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2015, 06:26 AM
  #91  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
Default

Originally Posted by Billy32 View Post
I think we should take all of this to it's conclusion. Can't be too safe right? Give everyone 1 calendar year to get their stuff straight then go full bore. BMI less than 30, liver enzymes, cholesterol tests, treadmill stress tests, MRI to check for hidden tumors, neurological testing, psychiatric exam, alchoholism screening, no nicotine allowed, dig deep to find any unknown potential health issue. You never know, might have some pilot out there flying with an undiagnosed illness. Never mind shuting down the air transpoortation system, gotta be safe. Oh yeah, why not a skills test too. I could be dead asleep and outfly some of the idiots I have flown with. I recommend a certain score on an AFOQT and TBAS.

Absolutely! You can't be too safe! I think we should do this type of screening before every leg, on every day, on every trip!

Because, well, do you know how many airline accidents have been caused by all those unhealthy pilots?

I just hope nobody at CNN finds out about this! Where's the guy with the goatee in the 777 sim? We need him to straighten this mess out!
Timbo is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 06:41 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N9373M's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,115
Default

Originally Posted by rvr1800 View Post
BS. How do you know? Maybe he's adapted to this type of sleep and feels fine. He's passed all his check rides. Maybe won't live as long as the rest of us but seriously we're going to also threaten his career? I'm am vehemently against this big brother type medical exam. Billy32's tongue in cheek response illustrates where this is headed if we allow this nonsense to continue.
I am also opposed to the big brother approach, but from what MikeF16 describes, in this one case, that person needs to be checked out. One does not adapt to "waking up" every 30-40 seconds, nor do they probably know they are suffering from it or even realize they are "waking up". I use the term "waking up" loosely. During an apnea, the O2 sats drop and the brain fires a message to get more oxygen. The person is not consciously aware of this.

It should not threaten his career, simply get his OSA treated.

I had OSA, did not know it (family doc suspected), had the sleep studies, did the CPAP and finally surgery to correct it. Occasionally, I would dream of being suffocated, and truly wake up gasping for air.

Last edited by N9373M; 03-18-2015 at 06:52 AM.
N9373M is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 07:13 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by N9373M View Post
I am also opposed to the big brother approach, but from what MikeF16 describes, in this one case, that person needs to be checked out. One does not adapt to "waking up" every 30-40 seconds, nor do they probably know they are suffering from it or even realize they are "waking up". I use the term "waking up" loosely. During an apnea, the O2 sats drop and the brain fires a message to get more oxygen. The person is not consciously aware of this.

It should not threaten his career, simply get his OSA treated.

I had OSA, did not know it (family doc suspected), had the sleep studies, did the CPAP and finally surgery to correct it. Occasionally, I would dream of being suffocated, and truly wake up gasping for air.
I don't deny that OSA is a serious issue and should be treated on ones own time and at ones own personal decision. I don't accept the FAA and AME diagnosing this and then having guys lose their medical over it. It goes way too far.

And to reiterate I will not be effected (affected?) by this whatsoever. I'm in the normal BMI range. My dad worked for the company that made the bipap and cpap. So I know how serious and widespread an issue it is and how shortsighted using BMI is.
rvr1800 is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 07:19 AM
  #94  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by rvr1800 View Post
Don't forget to add skin cancer screening for all fair skinned pilots. Ever had a tattoo or piercing? Better add proof you're hepatitis free. What about chicken pox? Well we all know the shingles virus is inside you right. Well you better demonstrate that you don't have shingles. Ever take Advil for a headache? Probably brain tumor.
Originally Posted by rvr1800 View Post
BS. How do you know? Maybe he's adapted to this type of sleep and feels fine. He's passed all his check rides. Maybe won't live as long as the rest of us but seriously we're going to also threaten his career? I'm am vehemently against this big brother type medical exam. Billy32's tongue in cheek response illustrates where this is headed if we allow this nonsense to continue.
Sleep apnea is clearly a fatigue issue. May not make you bust a checkride but you might fall asleep or make a huge screwup after a long day (or night).

I think they need a reasonable screening mechanism, whatever that might be, but just letting OSA slide by is probably not the right answer. They wouldn't let any of that other stuff you mentioned slide if they had reason to suspect. And maybe establish a grace period give folks the opportunity to make sure they don't have OSA.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 07:20 AM
  #95  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

So how many accidents have been attributed to OSA? if we can't find any, then let's start digging into other issues that have never caused an accident. Like old age when guys fall asleep in the cockpit more often. We need to start testing for that too, probably have to sit with the AME for 8 hours with a radio call every 20-60 minutes and see if they stay alert and awake.

So unless you want to start digging into things that have not caused accidents, I'd suggest we fight against this intrusion whether if affects you or not.
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 07:52 AM
  #96  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
Default

It's starting to sound like the Air Force's 'Fat Boy' program has migrated to the Airlines via the FAA.

You guys hash it out, I've got to go ride my bike now!

I'll probably be hit by a 92yr. old driving a Cadillac, or a kid driving while texting, but let's not worry about things like that, which we can easily stop, things that kill thousands of people every year on the highways.

Let's just pick on the fat guys who are flying airplanes and have never had an accident...

The best government money can buy!
Timbo is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 08:40 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
F15Cricket's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Right Seat 737, Front seat T-6
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by Billy32 View Post
I think we should take all of this to it's conclusion. Can't be too safe right? Give everyone 1 calendar year to get their stuff straight then go full bore. BMI less than 30, liver enzymes, cholesterol tests, treadmill stress tests, MRI to check for hidden tumors, neurological testing, psychiatric exam, alchoholism screening, no nicotine allowed, dig deep to find any unknown potential health issue. You never know, might have some pilot out there flying with an undiagnosed illness. Never mind shuting down the air transpoortation system, gotta be safe. Oh yeah, why not a skills test too. I could be dead asleep and outfly some of the idiots I have flown with. I recommend a certain score on an AFOQT and TBAS.
Maybe we also need to test the AMEs prior to our physical? And politicians prior to their votes--wouldn't want them voting on a defence bill, for instance, on not enough rest!

We should definitely push for FAA inspectors to have the same standards, as how could they safely inspect us if they themselves are unsafe?!
F15Cricket is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 09:56 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Sleep apnea is clearly a fatigue issue. May not make you bust a checkride but you might fall asleep or make a huge screwup after a long day (or night).

I think they need a reasonable screening mechanism, whatever that might be, but just letting OSA slide by is probably not the right answer. They wouldn't let any of that other stuff you mentioned slide if they had reason to suspect. And maybe establish a grace period give folks the opportunity to make sure they don't have OSA.
Why not? Hasn't been an issue for the over 100 years we've been doing this now. Maybe the Wright brothers had OSA?! We better start from scratch.
rvr1800 is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 06:58 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Default

Originally Posted by F15Cricket View Post
Maybe we also need to test the AMEs prior to our physical?
Any AME that sends a bunch of his customers to get 'screened' for this needs to be put out of business. If you've read anything from Dr Tilton, you'll see that they're expecting ~90% of pilots to have sleep apnea. And that includes the pilots that look like they've just been liberated from Auschwitz. So just because you're skinny doesn't mean that you won't eventually be a target of this silliness.

'Specialists' such as the OP will likely find 100% of 'fatties' have OSA. The FAA's going to take that information and continue to tighten the standards until 'specialists' like the OP have lined their pockets with every pilot's money. Because they're going to find that every single pilot has OSA, based on their screening criteria.
Andy is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 07:20 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Default

Originally Posted by N9373M View Post
I am also opposed to the big brother approach, but from what MikeF16 describes, in this one case, that person needs to be checked out. One does not adapt to "waking up" every 30-40 seconds, nor do they probably know they are suffering from it or even realize they are "waking up". I use the term "waking up" loosely. During an apnea, the O2 sats drop and the brain fires a message to get more oxygen. The person is not consciously aware of this.

It should not threaten his career, simply get his OSA treated.

I had OSA, did not know it (family doc suspected), had the sleep studies, did the CPAP and finally surgery to correct it. Occasionally, I would dream of being suffocated, and truly wake up gasping for air.
Let's take this 'waking up every 30-40 seconds' to the next silliness. Any pilot who has a colicky child should be required to stay in a hotel room so that they can get uninterrupted sleep.

No pilot can stay at any hotel that does not have totally soundproof rooms so that they get undisturbed sleep.

No pilot should be permitted to consume alcohol because it's been proven to disrupt your sleep. All pilots will be required to take antabuse.

Ah, the Big Brother silliness. George Orwell was just a couple of decades too early. I'm trying to shop for a top loading washer - thanks to .gov regulations, it's impossible to find one that gets your clothes clean. Thanks, Big Brother.

More regulations to fix nonexistent problems is always a good idea. In a totalitarian society. And anyone who favors this OSA silliness is getting the government that they deserve.
Andy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RealityCheck
Safety
70
08-18-2013 04:04 PM
OnTheKlacker
Major
208
09-09-2010 12:36 AM
Brian3613
Pilot Health
10
06-27-2008 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices