Search
Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

Flow backs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2020, 04:34 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by TallFlyer View Post
You should learn the difference between Crew Planning and Crew Scheduling.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm well aware of the fact that Jim is the resource for building the amount of reserves we have into the system. But let's not pretend like he doesn't provide what Brookelen (her name's proper spelling, I just learned this) asks for. The grid is the way it is because of Brookelen's use of it. Of course if the grid is consistently red at 35-40% Jim is going to staff her with more reservists.
They're team members who work together to keep the current mode of scheduling in place.
MarkVI is offline  
Old 04-01-2020, 04:37 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by captande View Post
I’m still torn on my view of all this. This is a different type of “recession” than 08’. Where as then no one had money, while currently people have money they just can’t spend it. You’ve got the essential employees and those who can work from home. They have income and when things are back rolling they’re going to want to gtfo and do something. Other hand there are the most people who have ever applied for unemployment. The stimulus is adding $600 a week to the state benefit, plus an additional 13 weeks beyond the state cap. Some people are going to be making more on unemployment than they did at their job. That’ll bridge the gap for almost 10 months, hoping for a rebound Q3/Q4. For a majority of industry once this is on the right path it’s just turn the lights on and back to business as usual, bringing me to why I think the airlines are going to try and avoid furlough as long as possible.

Then there is the real possibility we’re screwed until 2021 at the earliest.

At this point it’s out of our hands. Show up, do our job (leave the worry at home because the last thing the industry needs is an accident), and support each other.

At the end of the day it’s still just a virus. We’ve had them before and we’ll see them again. It’s just how long will a treatment and eventually a vaccine take. It’s not like we have to build a proton pack the take down the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man.
What we're negating here is consumer fear. Consumers don't spend on discretionary goods when they're scared. That the virus has shut down our economy as it has, that it has been publicized to be as lethal as it has, that it doesn't discriminate between young and old as it has (rare, but it is killing children without preexisting conditions) will drive up consumer fear. I think the bigger problem isn't with circulating cash, it's with convincing a large part of the herd that it's safe to go outside. Perhaps that will be easier said than done.
But something tells me simply removing the stay at home orders will not get the job done...
MarkVI is offline  
Old 04-02-2020, 04:23 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules View Post
Quite the opposite. I know far more about all of this than you do and this isn’t my first rodeo by a long shot. Buckle up buddy, it’s going to weird.
You know more about what carrier the capacity cuts will come from, or how big they will be system wide?

During your first 85% revenue cut rodeo you leaned how much capital spending it takes to move planes away from PSA and redeploy at another carrier, or you leaned how much the interest is on thier brand new 900s, vs letting another carrier take their 900's and do whatever they desire with them.

You've seen numbers that show you AA will have to fork out interest payments when Mesa's 900's sit idle when their contract expires?

Contract cost are 1 dimensional, and contract carrier cost go up when they reduce their fleet size. Even if Mesa has cheaper labor cost, to be lower out the door you'd have to throw in moving the planes over there, or idleing brand new ones with interest payments vs. letting Mesa shop a home for their planes no one needs.

You're on other forums suggesting a race to the bottomand to BK, like it's as easy as pushing a reset button with. The executives can easily loose control of the company, and any value of thier stock, if they reissue it.

Also you can't wash a labor contract by simply filling BK, it has to be part of a package a judge signs off on for the company to EXIT BK and still be solvent.

How can they Exit BK right now, with absolutely no info on revenue or passenger demand.

Right now if pilots flew for free the company would have to liquidate before it could reorganize down to 30% of itself without government bailouts. You are absolutely fear mongering, right now there is no cost point to achieve to be successful.

Last edited by Happyflyer; 04-02-2020 at 04:58 AM.
Happyflyer is offline  
Old 04-02-2020, 10:20 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chrisreedrules's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,599
Default

Originally Posted by Happyflyer View Post
You know more about what carrier the capacity cuts will come from, or how big they will be system wide?

During your first 85% revenue cut rodeo you leaned how much capital spending it takes to move planes away from PSA and redeploy at another carrier, or you leaned how much the interest is on thier brand new 900s, vs letting another carrier take their 900's and do whatever they desire with them.

You've seen numbers that show you AA will have to fork out interest payments when Mesa's 900's sit idle when their contract expires?

Contract cost are 1 dimensional, and contract carrier cost go up when they reduce their fleet size. Even if Mesa has cheaper labor cost, to be lower out the door you'd have to throw in moving the planes over there, or idleing brand new ones with interest payments vs. letting Mesa shop a home for their planes no one needs.

You're on other forums suggesting a race to the bottomand to BK, like it's as easy as pushing a reset button with. The executives can easily loose control of the company, and any value of thier stock, if they reissue it.

Also you can't wash a labor contract by simply filling BK, it has to be part of a package a judge signs off on for the company to EXIT BK and still be solvent.

How can they Exit BK right now, with absolutely no info on revenue or passenger demand.

Right now if pilots flew for free the company would have to liquidate before it could reorganize down to 30% of itself without government bailouts. You are absolutely fear mongering, right now there is no cost point to achieve to be successful.
I know a great deal of things I don’t divulge on here in what is essentially a public forum. I didn’t say American will declare BK tomorrow. But the reality of taking the amount of loans that saving the AA operation will require will be nearly unrecoverable for the airline. Ed Bastian said some himself in his town hall yesterday. Regarding capacity cuts etc, I expect several thousand on the streets this fall from all the airlines including regionals. This will not be a, “V” shaped recovery. The demand isn’t simply going to bounce back.
chrisreedrules is offline  
Old 04-02-2020, 11:25 AM
  #115  
Aeronautical Colleague
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 24
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules View Post
I know a great deal of things I don’t divulge on here in what is essentially a public forum. I didn’t say American will declare BK tomorrow. But the reality of taking the amount of loans that saving the AA operation will require will be nearly unrecoverable for the airline. Ed Bastian said some himself in his town hall yesterday. Regarding capacity cuts etc, I expect several thousand on the streets this fall from all the airlines including regionals. This will not be a, “V” shaped recovery. The demand isn’t simply going to bounce back.
This event reminds me of 1986 when I was working on my instrument rating, I told an airline pilot I was going to become an airline pilot and I'll never forget his response. He said 'if you had your ATP right now you couldn't get a job, we have captains with thousands of hours walking the street'. It's not what I wanted to hear but he was right.
Sky5 is offline  
Old 04-02-2020, 05:52 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Default

Originally Posted by JayBee View Post
Tell that to ENY folks that continually blame others for their negotiating shortcomings.
Others or just PSA? To my knowledge PSA is the only pilot group that Envoy has ever had trouble with. Let alone more than once.
Varsity is offline  
Old 04-02-2020, 06:06 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity View Post
Others or just PSA? To my knowledge PSA is the only pilot group that Envoy has ever had trouble with. Let alone more than once.
According to our latest union communication, they're working with us now. Let's let it drop for now.
highfarfast is offline  
Old 04-02-2020, 06:21 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

We shall see
buddies8 is offline  
Old 04-03-2020, 08:19 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,128
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver View Post
Negotiating on APC is bad form, dude.
So says the ALPA lawyers, who have been so successful for regionals over the decades.....
lots of bad feedback on a deal can often cause the company to sweeten the deal. Negotiations are NEVER finished until it's signed.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 04-03-2020, 08:21 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,128
Default

Originally Posted by JayBee View Post
Tell that to ENY folks that continually blame others for their negotiating shortcomings.
You have a short memory or just weren't here, and haven't bothered to learn history. That said, if the MEC's do not work together, and the pilots as well; what happened then will happen again as they pit one group against another.
Cujo665 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skyvector
Envoy Airlines
6894
06-18-2022 11:07 AM
fenix1
Envoy Airlines
53
10-14-2018 07:05 AM
Making it Count
PSA Airlines
49
08-25-2018 04:37 PM
weekendflyer
Technical
11
06-22-2011 05:11 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices