![]() |
Aviation is too small of a world to talk to people in that manner. We must save that for management!! :D
|
We all say some dumb things on here at one time or another, but you're on a roll. With the info you've given about your hours and years away from flying it would be very easy for recruiters to spot your app and learn who you are. Just keep that in mind. We can all get heated, but don't burn bridges.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2792903)
That young ladies like United uniforms more than they do those of Southwest? Or the color of the paint on the aircraft? The point is, nobody should care. Not THAT much certainly.
Relax. Let it go. Nobody HAS to be right every time on matters of religion, opinion, or politics. Save the obsessive compulsiveness and precision for flying the approach, identifying the runway, and making safe landings. Let the other $#it go. Other people can honorably hold other opinions. Once again, commenting on something is not complaining! Stating facts is not complaining! I don't care if United is 90% female pilots, I don't work there. Why is everyone blaming me for bringing this up? I didn't bring it up, I just stated facts. A female or minority has never taken my job. I ain't mad. We've gone way off the subject of regional lifers here. My question was answered a couple pages in. |
Originally Posted by Fixnem2Flyinem
(Post 2792908)
Aviation is too small of a world to talk to people in that manner. We must save that for management!! :D
https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Third-Wor...ptical-Kid.jpg |
|
Originally Posted by Taco280AI
(Post 2792912)
We all say some dumb things on here at one time or another, but you're on a roll. With the info you've given about your hours and years away from flying it would be very easy for recruiters to spot your app and learn who you are. Just keep that in mind. We can all get heated, but don't burn bridges.
Like I said earlier, read my post history. I've been as cordial as can be, until I'm insulted. Seriously, what have I said that is so bad except for giving it back to people who've attacked me. I honestly want to know so I can refrain from doing it again. I appreciate any feedback. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2792903)
Save the obsessive compulsiveness and precision for flying the approach, identifying the runway, and making safe landings.
|
|
Okay. A drunk post. Probably something I shouldn’t do.
I speak as someone whose wife was an aviation pioneer in the military but then chose a different path. She really suffered some crap to get where she did. I saw what she went through first hand. So I don’t want to hear any lectures about women in aviation. Pulease. I have no issue with a female being equal to me, heck, even a female who isn’t “equal” to me but a great person and pilot getting hired ahead of me. I’ve seen some of them and I tip my hat to them. They deserved what they got and they should hold their heads up proudly. I, and speaking for her here my wife, do have an issue with any substandard women (or men, for that matter), who get hired. We have seen in this industry women who can’t make it through training at a major. Rather than being washed out like any other person they are pushed off to another division, say recruiting, where their minority status can be marketed. Once their seniority can hold an easier airframe they are put back through training. This is a disservice not just to the flying public, but a slap in the face to my wife and all the other women and minorities who busted their butts and overcame true discrimation to prove themselves as great pilots. So that is my issue. Every time I look at what my wife went through and see anyone, white, black, Asian, female... doesn’t matter... getting a pass it makes me want to puke. Sorry if I offended anyone. |
Originally Posted by No Land 3
(Post 2792283)
This is an extremely bitter subject where emotions run high. Nothing is a guarantee in life, even tomorrow. There are those that won the lottery, and those that haven't. Luck has more to do it than you realize. Maybe you were lucky and won the Ovarian lottery, and was born a beautiful person? Maybe you didn't wind up with a guy who is nicknamed "Pink slip Pinkston" while getting your CFI's, maybe you made a move when no one else was for a diamond in the rough? You can only put your best foot forward and hope for some luck.
Don’t judge your advancement or place in life against what others have attained. But look at your life as a whole. Are you happy? And don’t judge others by where you are. As the slaves would whisper in the ears of Roman generals during parades, all glory is fleeting. Why did that regional pilot become a “lifer”? Who knows. But don’t assume after a few years that you have this industry figured out. Thank God K4 threw me a lifeline. I will always be grateful. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2792243)
I think you are slowly realizing, that your experience is stale and pretty much worthless by now. That's why you're struggling to even get hired by a regional. Don't expect 1000 fresh hours suddenly will make you a prime candidate for majors.
|
Originally Posted by Flyboy68
(Post 2792539)
Take two pilots, one white male, the other a female. Same flight times, ratings, education, training records, background, basically all things being equal.
Send both of their apps into the majors, and my money is on the female to get an interview and be hired first. I'm not saying the male wouldn't be hired also or eventually, but if they're vying for one spot, it's not even a contest. Who would you put your money on? Take 2 crew members sitting in the same cockpit, one in the left seat, one in the right. One has thousands of hours of 121 PIC time and multiple type ratings, a 4 year degree(3.8 GPA) and no check ride failures or DUI's etc. The other is a new hire FO hired at the minimum required flight time for 121 flying and is working on a 2 year degree. Who do you think was approached by the mainline recruiter and given a business card after being asked if they'd ever considered working there? |
Originally Posted by Paid2fly
(Post 2792977)
Who do you think was approached by the mainline recruiter and given a business card after being asked if they'd ever considered working there?
How many soup kitchens volunteered at and kittens rescued? |
Originally Posted by Flyboy68
(Post 2792820)
I've had enough of you asses personally attacking everyone you disagree with. Go to hell d-bag.
I'm sick of you petty little twats. |
Originally Posted by Rahlifer
(Post 2793027)
Easy there Trigger. These boards aren’t anonymous by any stretch of the imagination and your company probably has some sort of policy about watching out on social media. Anywhoo. You really are gonna have to develop a much thicker skin if you want to last in this industry, especially at the regional level. Things won’t go to well if you go flying off the handle the first time a snarky gate agent or condescending mainline pilot rub you the wrong way.
|
Originally Posted by Flyboy68
(Post 2792885)
If females make up 5.18% of pilots, and 7.2% of United pilots are female, what does that mean?
|
My broad observations from working for two regionals, now at a major and jumpseating on SkyWest often. It would seem a number lifers at the regionals especially smaller ones or anyone who works for Hulas are oddballs. I don’t think many could handle being in the right seat again. SkyWest has a lot of very solid captains who are choosing to stay because of schedule and where they are based. At this point SkyWest seems pretty stable and many of their employees feel they have been treated ‘well’. I still think they’re crazy for giving up money at the majors for a Fresno base though.
|
Originally Posted by Paid2fly
(Post 2792977)
Take 2 crew members sitting in the same cockpit, one in the left seat, one in the right. One has thousands of hours of 121 PIC time and multiple type ratings, a 4 year degree(3.8 GPA) and no check ride failures or DUI's etc. The other is a new hire FO hired at the minimum required flight time for 121 flying and is working on a 2 year degree.
Who do you think was approached by the mainline recruiter and given a business card after being asked if they'd ever considered working there? |
Originally Posted by itsmytime
(Post 2793047)
Not the one that only has a 2 year degree.
|
Something to consider...
Women aren't taking every ones jobs. In its intention, diversity based preferential hiring is a good thing. The Legacies now welcome demographics who have been barred historically and deemed unfit for the cockpit. They go out of their way to hire them. It is an attempt to right a wrong. However there is a group of people who are more affected by diversity based preferential hiring than others. The Legacies are primarily out for themselves and not too concerned with fairness besides the two or three interest groups whom we all know about. Put it this way: Initially the female 7% of 800 newhires in 2019 for airline X doesn't seem like a huge amount but consider this: 1:40% are military since oldtimers who have a say in the hiring department statistically are military as well. They are also guaranteed to have had high quality training. 2:40% are flows/CPP. This is a purely economic strategy in which the Legacies control pilot cost by keeping RJs staffed and wages low with a promise of a job or interview at the associated Legacy. 3: That leaves 20%. All of a sudden the pie for the remaining pilots becomes a lot smaller! The guy who lost the flow/preferential lottery through no fault of his own is now watching his peers, some of which settled for substandard contracts, get called while they wait. Add JetBlue pilots and Spirit Guys to the mix and your average non flow 10 year+ RJ captain is left with: 4: The final 10%. The experienced RJ Captain is left behind. He forces himself to go to Hiring events for gays, blacks, and women. He's not there to show support. He's there to beg for someone to look at his resume. He buys the tickets, the right colored suit and tie, the hotel room, and the rental car. He does it year after year even though it feels wrong. He gets conflicting information "keep doing what you're doing, try to get another type, when was your last initial?, do you do volunteer work?" He hears nothing meanwhile he sees 2000hour giggly girls in their 20's getting hired. Now naturally its easy for a man in the final 10% to get hung up on the diversity preference. That is the pond he's in and those are the fish he's swimming with so one can understand his frustration. As myopic as it may be to blame the minorities for not getting hired I sympathize with these people. Many were dealt a bad hand. Just realize the real reason that you are left behind may very well be that you simply lost the RJ lottery. My advice to people stuck in the RJ world is this: GET OUT! You've lost the RJ lottery. They are not pulling many from your ranks for whatever reason. You are competing in the last 3-5% of the hiring pool. Go to a ULCC, LCC, Cargo or whatever it takes. Just don't stay in your CRJ, you have plateaued. |
Originally Posted by Flyboy68
(Post 2792914)
Soooo, you're saying I'd make a good manager? :D
https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Third-Wor...ptical-Kid.jpg Please if there is a God in Heaven please don’t choose Xjet. Your attitude is horrendous, you definitely need some humble pie. As you are right now with this attitude you are a liability on the flight deck. |
Originally Posted by Flyboy68
(Post 2792539)
Take two pilots, one white male, the other a female. Same flight times, ratings, education, training records, background, basically all things being equal.
Send both of their apps into the majors, and my money is on the female to get an interview and be hired first. I'm not saying the male wouldn't be hired also or eventually, but if they're vying for one spot, it's not even a contest. Who would you put your money on? |
Watching a meltdown on the message boards never gets old.
|
Originally Posted by TheWeatherman
(Post 2793104)
Watching a meltdown on the message boards never gets old.
It’s like driving by a car wreck on the interstate, you have to slow down to sneak a peak. |
This begs the question: Should every profession represent a cross-section of society?
Professional sports teams? Hairdressers? Pedicurists? Wait staff? Nurses? Teachers? If not, why? |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 2793108)
This begs the question: Should every profession represent a cross-section of society?
Professional sports teams? Hairdressers? Pedicurists? Wait staff? Nurses? Teachers? If not, why? |
Originally Posted by No Land 3
(Post 2793103)
Everything wrong in today's world probably stems from a lawyer and a lawsuit.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2791029)
Lots of factors but among them is the ridiculous first year wages at some of the ULCCs. There was a long discussion on this subject on a Frontier thread back when their negotiations were going on. The pilot group didn't wish to "waste" any "negotiating capital" on bringing newbie's on board. So what did the first year FO wages end up?
$58 an hour for Frontier $57 for Spirit $78 for JetBlue So if you are currently making $90-100 an hour as a regional captain, WITH YOUR CHOICE OF SCHEDULES, how hard is it to take a 45% pay cut for a year and go back on reserve in some crash pad for a couple years, because your roots are too firmly planted after a decade or so to relocate? Pretty hard. Not impossible, certainly, but it's a serious emotional barrier, and the more senior (i.e., older) you are, the smaller the carrot for doing it and the greater the carrot for just staying put. So in a way it's the major airlines' pilot union negotiating tactics that are hurting these guys, or at least making the decision to move on more complicated than it would otherwise be. |
Many just don't want to be #13999 on the list when the next recession hits.
|
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 2793108)
This begs the question: Should every profession represent a cross-section of society?
Professional sports teams? Hairdressers? Pedicurists? Wait staff? Nurses? Teachers? If not, why? Other jobs, they just don't want to do. How many straight men do nails? How many women collect garbage? Both potentially pay well, just no desire to do it. |
Originally Posted by nuball5
(Post 2793124)
Where are you getting $78/hr at Jetblue from?
https://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/...etblue_airways That’s still a pay cut for a senior regional captain most places today. Especially when you consider the cost of the crash pad and the loss of scheduling priority that allowed them to pick up premium pay. Even more so if they were an LCA or SLIP living in base. The point is that it’s a CUT. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2793144)
Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, it’s now up to $86.
https://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/...etblue_airways That’s still a pay cut for a senior regional captain most places today. Especially when you consider the cost of the crash pad and the loss of scheduling priority that allowed them to pick up premium pay. Even more so if they were an LCA or SLIP living in base. The point is that it’s a CUT. |
Originally Posted by Taco280AI
(Post 2793138)
No. Because some lines of work simply don't interest a certain sex. It has been proven that women avoid certain careers, not because they can't do them well, but simply because they don't want the lifestyle. Men, on average, work more hours, take less sick days, take less time off, use less vacation time than women from studies I've seen. Much of it has to do with family, especially if there are kids involved. In this case maybe being a pilot isn't as desired for women because it will take them away from family more.
Other jobs, they just don't want to do. How many straight men do nails? How many women collect garbage? Both potentially pay well, just no desire to do it. |
Many reasons people don’t leave. It’s always funny though when people make up stories to justify their reasons why they haven’t left. This from a Skywest lifer thread is typical
“ I'm running into guys who left 20 year ago. One guy, a UAL F/O wishes he'd never left. One guy got furloughed by the same major - twice. He was literally an OO new-hire three times. Another guy is a wide-body F/O. He could easily be a narrow-body captain but still wouldn't hold weekends off. Everyone I know who went to SWA is happy there and making good money. I often ask them what there are doing next weekend - invariably, it's working. Most of the guys I know that were unhappy here are unhappy elsewhere too” Newsflash. I’ve NEVER met anyone from UA, DL, SWA or the bigger cargo carriers who think they make a mistake leaving. Crock of shjt. They guy that posted that is essentially unhirable anyway as he’s a miserable SOAB. |
The vast majority of the weirdest and worst pilots I flew with at XJT were lifers. Always with an excuse of why they stayed on and the excuse was always odd.
|
Originally Posted by domino
(Post 2793150)
Many reasons people don’t leave. It’s always funny though when people make up stories to justify their reasons why they haven’t left. This from a Skywest lifer thread is typical
“ I'm running into guys who left 20 year ago. One guy, a UAL F/O wishes he'd never left. One guy got furloughed by the same major - twice. He was literally an OO new-hire three times. Another guy is a wide-body F/O. He could easily be a narrow-body captain but still wouldn't hold weekends off. Everyone I know who went to SWA is happy there and making good money. I often ask them what there are doing next weekend - invariably, it's working. Most of the guys I know that were unhappy here are unhappy elsewhere too” Newsflash. I’ve NEVER met anyone from UA, DL, SWA or the bigger cargo carriers who think they make a mistake leaving. Crock of shjt. They guy that posted that is essentially unhirable anyway as he’s a miserable SOAB. |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 2793108)
This begs the question: Should every profession represent a cross-section of society?
Professional sports teams? Hairdressers? Pedicurists? Wait staff? Nurses? Teachers? If not, why? Every profession should reasonably represent a fair cross section of qualified applicants. If there's real discrimination it would show up there. Also reasonable (IMO only) to help improve education and outreach for the youth of under-represented demographics. I'm willing to pay for that too. Teach a man to fish and all that. But once you're an adult you need to compete on your merits, otherwise you institutionalize hypocrisy, perpetuate racial/cultural divides, and perpetuate a culture of people who do not stand on their own two feet. Look to the federal civil service if you have any questions about that last. |
Originally Posted by Joachim
(Post 2793064)
In its intention, diversity based preferential hiring is a good thing.
People should be hired on their merits, nothing more (except maybe their personalities too of course). Hiring someone for their skin color, nationality, race, sexual preference, sex, etc is pure discrimination -- the same as it would be for NOT hiring someone based on the same criteria. |
Originally Posted by word302
(Post 2793147)
How about with retirement? Profit sharing? It's pretty easy to skew the numbers the other way.
All I’m saying is that it would be easier to take the step from senior regional captain to juniorist of the junior major FO if the economic hit weren’t there. |
Originally Posted by Joachim
(Post 2793064)
In its intention, diversity based preferential hiring is a good thing.
Originally Posted by Taco280AI
(Post 2793138)
No. Because some lines of work simply don't interest a certain sex.
Originally Posted by Taco280AI
(Post 2793138)
has been proven that women avoid certain careers, not because they can't do them well, but simply because they don't want the lifestyle.
Originally Posted by Taco280AI
(Post 2793138)
on average, work more hours, take less sick days, take less time off, use less vacation time than women from studies I've seen. Much of it has to do with family, especially if there are kids involved. In this case maybe being a pilot isn't as desired for women because it will take them away from family more.
Originally Posted by Taco280AI
(Post 2793138)
jobs, they just don't want to do. How many straight men do nails? How many women collect garbage? Both potentially pay well, just no desire to do it.
And why are singling out "straight"?
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2793174)
No
every profession should reasonably represent a fair cross section of qualified applicants. If there's real discrimination it would show up there.
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2793174)
reasonable (IMO only) to help improve education and outreach for the youth of under-represented demographics. I'm willing to pay for that too. Teach a man to fish and all that.
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2793174)
once you're an adult you need to compete on your merits, otherwise you institutionalize hypocrisy, perpetuate racial/cultural divides, and perpetuate a culture of people who do not stand on their own two feet. Look to the federal civil service if you have any questions about that last.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands