Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Lying pilot recruiters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2019 | 03:49 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by C37AFE
...frontier is not a major per se
It is a major. It is not a legacy.
Reply
Old 04-15-2019 | 05:27 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: sideways
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
It's a major. Certainly not a top tier one, but their last contract was a substantial improvement.

And it is a place where you can make $110K a year as a second year FO while buffing your resume to attract a job offer from where you really want to be. And if you never get the call, you'll be making $250k a year or better when you eventually retire. Can't say that about many regionals....


You are correct. When I said per se I meant in the legacy terms and I took the op as flows to them as what they where referring to. Even though he said major most consider legacies the majors

Last edited by C37AFE; 04-15-2019 at 05:49 AM.
Reply
Old 04-15-2019 | 05:37 AM
  #13  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 21
From: A-320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Approach1260
It's not so much that they lie, it's just that they don't tell you the whole truth.

For instance recruiters will tell you PSA has a 5-6 year flow, because pilots on property for that long are currently flowing. Due to growth though a current new hire is looking at closer to a decade to flow because the pilot group is so much bigger than it used to be.

So it's just learning to read between the lines and do your research on your own.

Not all of us actually tell people they will flow in 5-6 years because we all know the math isn’t there to substantiate that claim. I am a recruiter and I am pretty much up front with people about expectations like the flow- it’s an insurance policy... nothing more.. nothing less. I prefer people to make an educated decision on where they want to go based on their needs and whole picture so they don’t eventually get on here and blast the company or the “lying recruiter” that told them XYZ

There are some of us out there that actually care about their company, applicants, pilot group... you just have to find the right one.
Reply
Old 04-15-2019 | 05:43 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Strykerinf
Not all of us actually tell people they will flow in 5-6 years because we all know the math isn’t there to substantiate that claim. I am a recruiter and I am pretty much up front with people about expectations like the flow- it’s an insurance policy... nothing more.. nothing less. I prefer people to make an educated decision on where they want to go based on their needs and whole picture so they don’t eventually get on here and blast the company or the “lying recruiter” that told them XYZ

There are some of us out there that actually care about their company, applicants, pilot group... you just have to find the right one.
Then why don't you change all the recruiting literature to stop advertising 5-6 yr flow?
Reply
Old 04-15-2019 | 06:10 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rld1k
Then why don't you change all the recruiting literature to stop advertising 5-6 yr flow?
Boom, mic drop.
Reply
Old 04-15-2019 | 06:57 AM
  #16  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 104
Likes: 21
From: A-320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by rld1k
Then why don't you change all the recruiting literature to stop advertising 5-6 yr flow?
You’re basically saying that a private should tell a General how to do their job.. let’s see how that would play out. Not trying to argue, debate, or even defend anyone. I am just saying not all of us lie to people.
Reply
Old 04-15-2019 | 07:52 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: sideways
Default

Originally Posted by Strykerinf
You’re basically saying that a private should tell a General how to do their job.. let’s see how that would play out. Not trying to argue, debate, or even defend anyone. I am just saying not all of us lie to people.
The private should definately give advise to the general. They are the ones actually on the front lines. A good general would listen
Reply
Old 04-15-2019 | 08:29 AM
  #18  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by C37AFE
The private should definately give advise to the general. They are the ones actually on the front lines. A good general would listen
A private is 18-19 years old, and trained to maneuver and employ a weapon. He probably has absolutely no insight whatsoever to offer a general.

The general has decades of experience at every level of the military, and insight and experience into all the OTHER things which are required for military operations and the broader security objectives of his nation. He is also educated, with typically advanced degrees, at least one of which will involve geo-politics, strategy, history, etc. Oh, yeah and he fought in the trenches with a bunch of privates when he was a LT. So he already knows. He just needs to make sure he's in tune with the current realities of the front-line troops, because things can change over time, and in different circumstances. But he probably doesn't need advice from a teenager.

"Amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics"
Reply
Old 04-15-2019 | 09:17 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
A private is 18-19 years old, and trained to maneuver and employ a weapon. He probably has absolutely no insight whatsoever to offer a general.

The general has decades of experience at every level of the military, and insight and experience into all the OTHER things which are required for military operations and the broader security objectives of his nation. He is also educated, with typically advanced degrees, at least one of which will involve geo-politics, strategy, history, etc. Oh, yeah and he fought in the trenches with a bunch of privates when he was a LT. So he already knows. He just needs to make sure he's in tune with the current realities of the front-line troops, because things can change over time, and in different circumstances. But he probably doesn't need advice from a teenager.

"Amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics"
Paint it however you want, it’s still false advertising which ever way you cut it.
Reply
Old 04-15-2019 | 09:22 AM
  #20  
Meow1215's Avatar
On Guard!
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665
Honestly, the pilot shortage is just kicking into high gear starting this year.
To the OP, one of the most important things you need to learn and quickly - there is no pilot shortage, there is however a pay shortage.

Don’t let anybody rook you into thinking there is a pilot shortage or that their will be one. There will always been more ATPs than desirable ATP jobs. Been hearing for 30 years, “it’s coming”, “just around the corner”, “this year”. No, there is no pilot shortage. If the pay and QOL are good, that airline has no issues hiring and retaining. If it’s crap with crap work rules - they cannot staff it.

Go somewhere:
1. You can live in domicile
2. Stand being there for up to 5 years
3. Stable flying contracts
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
in2deep
Envoy Airlines
10
12-12-2017 08:25 PM
Hou757
PSA Airlines
34
09-12-2017 07:25 PM
MartinBishop
Career Questions
6
07-19-2016 07:33 PM
BizPilot
Alaska
4
01-31-2016 02:24 PM
Dog Breath
Pilot Health
5
03-22-2011 08:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices