![]() |
United Aviate
Why did United only include their worst performing and least reliable regionals in their cute new Aviate program?
Is it just a recruiting tool to fill seats at these bottom-feeder airlines since no one would otherwise choose such a poor QOL? Or is it because they’re UAX-exclusive (aka American & Delta rejects)? |
Worst performing defined where?
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
I think Mesa is one of the best performing United regionals consistently.
All these regionals have undesirable bases. |
|
I read you could be at United in two years? Is that correct? So everyone at those airlines longer than two years bombed it?
|
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 2907347)
I read you could be at United in two years? Is that correct? So everyone at those airlines longer than two years bombed it?
It’s a new program, all they have to do now is apply, and successfully complete the interview process. The CJO should include normal background stuff and the 2yrs/2000 hours of service. |
I still don't get it, everyone hired prior to Oct 2017 has been passed over?
|
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 2907372)
I still don't get it, everyone hired prior to Oct 2017 has been passed over?
I was in the CPP. My timeline was Hogan 5/17, interview 1/18 and butt in the seat 8/19 |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2907215)
Why did United only include their worst performing and least reliable regionals in their cute new Aviate program?
Is it just a recruiting tool to fill seats at these bottom-feeder airlines since no one would otherwise choose such a poor QOL? Or is it because they’re UAX-exclusive (aka American & Delta rejects)? If you want the Aviate program join on if the Aviate regionals. If you don’t then shut up and color |
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 2907372)
I still don't get it, everyone hired prior to Oct 2017 has been passed over?
|
Quick, let’s rebadge it and fluff it up and hope no one realizes that the polished turd is being rolled in glitter.
|
Originally Posted by havick206
(Post 2907432)
Quick, let’s rebadge it and fluff it up and hope no one realizes that the polished turd is being rolled in glitter.
|
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 2907484)
Somebody is either jealous or had no desire to go to United in the first place.
To put context into my post, I had only about 18 months to go on my flow and moved on to the gig I have wanted for a long time. |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2907215)
Why did United only include their worst performing and least reliable regionals in their cute new Aviate program?
Is it just a recruiting tool to fill seats at these bottom-feeder airlines since no one would otherwise choose such a poor QOL? Or is it because they’re UAX-exclusive (aka American & Delta rejects)? Not trying to be sarcastic, I’m serious. |
Originally Posted by itsmytime
(Post 2907557)
Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see anything about the aviate program that’s any different from applying off the street. Please enlighten me as to what advantage the uax pilots are getting?
Not trying to be sarcastic, I’m serious. |
Originally Posted by JasonR
(Post 2907411)
No, the program has only been around for several months.
2yrs/2000hrs is a minimum - it's still going to be seniority based within each regional, so I seriously doubt anyone is going to move anytime soon at 2yrs and 2000hrs. People who are already at a partner UAX regional have until 12/20 to apply. That group is the 1st wave and within that wave, seniority within your company determines the order that people go (after they pass the assessments, pass the interview, etc, and get a CJO). After that, it's a first-in-first-out process based on either application date or CJO date (I have not gotten clarity on that question yet). No goal numbers mentioned other than "10,000 pilots".... https://unitedaviate.com/ |
It’s an attempt at the Delta Propel along with the old CPP with a stated goal of being the fastest route to a legacy airline. Soon college kids will have a CJO with UA and will only need 2000 regional hours to move on. It also helps staff the UAX regionals which will help them shrink the amount of flying YX and OO brands that think their pilots are special and not replaceable.
|
Originally Posted by itsmytime
(Post 2907557)
Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see anything about the aviate program that’s any different from applying off the street. Please enlighten me as to what advantage the uax pilots are getting?
What I think is a little unnerving is that they are going to interview brand new regional FOs and even trainees just like they would interview a 5+ yr regional CA. And there is now a technical interview aspect. Not sure I'm ready for that interview in the next few months. |
You need to look at history. A regional and its performance can be fixed with money. Regionals that have been poor performers (like pinnacle) can be set up as a pipeline/feed to a major. The mainline invests money in the infrastructure and turns the place around (endeavor). I think we’ll see more and more wholly owned regionals in the future with direct paths to that major.
|
Ok, so you pass the interview and then get your 2 years/2000hrs logged, and then seniority determines the order for who moves on to UA...but at what rate? X-pilots per month? You log 2k hours and then off you go right away? Something else? Is it basically a monthly flow through contingent upon passing the interview?
I have seen this answered yet. |
Originally Posted by flynd94
(Post 2907563)
The advantage (a huge one) is that they are given the Hogan automatically. For an off the street your application has to be scored and you hope to get the invite. Big advantage.
|
Originally Posted by AZFlyer
(Post 2907755)
Ok, so you pass the interview and then get your 2 years/2000hrs logged, and then seniority determines the order for who moves on to UA...but at what rate? X-pilots per month? You log 2k hours and then off you go right away? Something else? Is it basically a monthly flow through contingent upon passing the interview?
I have seen this answered yet. |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2907215)
Why did United only include their worst performing and least reliable regionals in their cute new Aviate program?
Is it just a recruiting tool to fill seats at these bottom-feeder airlines since no one would otherwise choose such a poor QOL? Or is it because they’re UAX-exclusive (aka American & Delta rejects)? |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2907215)
Why did United only include their worst performing and least reliable regionals in their cute new Aviate program?
Is it just a recruiting tool to fill seats at these bottom-feeder airlines since no one would otherwise choose such a poor QOL? Or is it because they’re UAX-exclusive (aka American & Delta rejects)? |
There is no Hogan on for Aviate. There is a leadership assessment that you take in Denver on interview day.
|
For non united regionals and 135, my guess is down the road United will let you apply and come to Denver to interview. If you get a yes you can come to United after flying 2k hrs 24 months at a United regional.
|
You think united would want a pool of United brand experienced pilots and allow all the regionals that fly United to apply. If I end up going to United I would benefit United and hurt the others because I can’t go there now.
Aviate seems like a non wholly owned wholly owned that will be a true wholly owned of United with a flow once the FA’s give up their clause. I think everything’s pointing in that direction and United is trying to get their wholly Owned set up to do just that in the future. |
Originally Posted by NovemberBravo
(Post 2908296)
There is no Hogan on for Aviate. There is a leadership assessment that you take in Denver on interview day.
|
No One Knows
No one knows how it's going to work.
Not even the people running it. They've been putting out changes, mistakenly sent stuff out, etc. Also anecdotally, the percentage for an INTERVIEW accept rate seems higher than the CPP by far, but inexplicably some people you think would get an interview don't. AFAIK there have been zero interviews, so zero data on that or anything beyond. I *HOPE* that it is far better than the CPP, which wouldn't be hard, but so far IMHO it's not looking great. There's SO many ways to not make it in. It feels experimental. Beta. "Let's see if this works." By the time they get it 'figured out' something more competitive will be required. Like a real flow. It's another carrot you may or may not reach. The best mental attitude is probably: you might not get it, you might not, it's not a real reason to come to a UAX exclusive carrier. Nice to have if you're here or coming here for other reasons. That's it. It will also be interesting to see what happens when the economy downturns again. Money says UAL will ask for it's pilots to flow down to the regionals vs. a furlough. When that happens, demand CONCRETE language they give something in return. Last time, Continental pulled the ladder up after the flowbacks left is my understanding. |
Originally Posted by YANXJTPilot
(Post 2909425)
No one knows how it's going to work.
Not even the people running it. They've been putting out changes, mistakenly sent stuff out, etc. Also anecdotally, the percentage for an INTERVIEW accept rate seems higher than the CPP by far, but inexplicably some people you think would get an interview don't. AFAIK there have been zero interviews, so zero data on that or anything beyond. I *HOPE* that it is far better than the CPP, which wouldn't be hard, but so far IMHO it's not looking great. There's SO many ways to not make it in. It feels experimental. Beta. "Let's see if this works." By the time they get it 'figured out' something more competitive will be required. Like a real flow. It's another carrot you may or may not reach. The best mental attitude is probably: you might not get it, you might not, it's not a real reason to come to a UAX exclusive carrier. Nice to have if you're here or coming here for other reasons. That's it. It will also be interesting to see what happens when the economy downturns again. Money says UAL will ask for it's pilots to flow down to the regionals vs. a furlough. When that happens, demand CONCRETE language they give something in return. Last time, Continental pulled the ladder up after the flowbacks left is my understanding. That’s the only way the uax regionals are going to grow is for young CFI’s to start flocking to them. Also saves them money as they don’t have to improve their contracts. If a guy has a CJO at a major, dependent on him going to said regional, he’s going regardless of the pay/working conditions. |
Originally Posted by itsmytime
(Post 2909407)
So “the hogan” rebranded as a “leadership assessment?”
|
Originally Posted by Burt123
(Post 2909561)
The Hogan is still required, it says on the website.
|
Did anyone else realize Aviate basically has a near 1 year penalty. So basically after being accepted no matter what your status is you have to wait 6 months. So that pushes any of us to May no matter how senior you are. And if you miss those couple classes till summer when UA usually stops hiring you won’t see a classes until what September. A 9 month hold is ridiculous.
|
Originally Posted by NovemberBravo
(Post 2909760)
Did anyone else realize Aviate basically has a near 1 year penalty. So basically after being accepted no matter what your status is you have to wait 6 months. So that pushes any of us to May no matter how senior you are. And if you miss those couple classes till summer when UA usually stops hiring you won’t see a classes until what September. A 9 month hold is ridiculous.
|
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 2909796)
Cool, so take your chances off the street then.
|
Originally Posted by NovemberBravo
(Post 2909760)
Did anyone else realize Aviate basically has a near 1 year penalty. So basically after being accepted no matter what your status is you have to wait 6 months. So that pushes any of us to May no matter how senior you are. And if you miss those couple classes till summer when UA usually stops hiring you won’t see a classes until what September. A 9 month hold is ridiculous.
|
Originally Posted by NovemberBravo
(Post 2909858)
Lol I can’t be bummed after recently hitting the previous requirements and now seeing they’ve been pushed out further. Haha tough crowd.
|
Originally Posted by RabidW0mbat
(Post 2909861)
That’s the nature of the beast. Sheesh, pilots will ***** about anything.
|
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 2907710)
You need to look at history. A regional and its performance can be fixed with money. Regionals that have been poor performers (like pinnacle) can be set up as a pipeline/feed to a major. The mainline invests money in the infrastructure and turns the place around (endeavor). I think we’ll see more and more wholly owned regionals in the future with direct paths to that major.
|
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 2909865)
Many of the new people have no clue how bad it was. I heard a new hire student ask his sim instructor “why aren’t you at a major yet? You should be able to go easily!” The instructor has had his app in for years..
His sim instructor just like other pilots probably doesn’t have a degree. Doesn’t volunteer, the older pilot group doesn’t see the value in volunteering n believe it should be about piloting that’s it. Probably doesn’t have a professional resume. They stop applying!!!! Got comfy with their seniority. Nearing the age of retirement. Doesn’t wanna start over. Zero networking, zero events conventions attended. The older pilot isn’t gonna follow a regional chief pilot on social media and get buddy buddy with him meet for lunch and have him as a mentor!( GEMS ) Just to name some reasons. It’s called a job HUNT for a reason. The food doesn’t come to you you gotta get creative. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands