Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Lost decade 2.0?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2020, 12:12 PM
  #121  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,948
Default

Originally Posted by brocklee9000 View Post
And there are plenty of airports regionals operate in where a mainline plane would never be able to go. It’s not always a matter of consolidating 5 daily flight to 1 weekly flight, or maintaining slot/gate space, or whatever frequency is required at small airports for EAS agreements. Sometimes it comes down to size and performance. You’ll never see mainline at State College, Flagstaff, Aspen, Ithaca, or any number of small airports.
Before deregulation, Ozark did milk runs up and down the Mississippi River, from Memphis to Minneapolis, 5 intermediate stops. Covered a lot of what are now EAS airports. Used the DC-9 (prestretched version of the Mad Dog). Worked fine.

If two or three off and two or three on at each stop, it was considered a good day. If loads were 35%, things were good.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 08-06-2020, 01:30 PM
  #122  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
Before deregulation, Ozark did milk runs up and down the Mississippi River, from Memphis to Minneapolis, 5 intermediate stops. Covered a lot of what are now EAS airports. Used the DC-9 (prestretched version of the Mad Dog). Worked fine.

If two or three off and two or three on at each stop, it was considered a good day. If loads were 35%, things were good.
Oil was $3/bbl
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-06-2020, 02:00 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bradthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Oil was $3/bbl

...and ticket prices were controlled...dare I say "regulated"... such that a profit, however meager, was more likely than not.
bradthepilot is offline  
Old 08-06-2020, 02:39 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,383
Default

Could be another lost decade. Who knows. A lot of young pilots in this forum were in denial and discounting what us older pilots were saying about our lost decade. Who knew you guys would have it worse! Good luck.
Learflyer is offline  
Old 08-06-2020, 04:16 PM
  #125  
I Pass the Butter
 
brocklee9000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Oil was $3/bbl
Originally Posted by bradthepilot View Post
...and ticket prices were controlled...dare I say "regulated"... such that a profit, however meager, was more likely than not.
So again, whether it’s a literal aircraft performance limitation or a financial performance limitation, we won’t see mainline planes or pilots in a lot of these cities. Not when some airports are small, loads are small, and a full regional crew costs as much per hour as one mainline captain. Regionals are here to stay, and in these times it seems like FFD might be marginally more secure than WO. That’s my opinion and I’m sticking to it for now.
brocklee9000 is offline  
Old 08-06-2020, 05:47 PM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Admiral
Posts: 726
Default

Originally Posted by brocklee9000 View Post
yes, but that subject has been argued to death for years. We would all love to be absorbed by a major. They’ll never do it though.
Who said anything about being absorbed? There would be plenty of soon to be furloughed mainline pilots to fly them. It's not like they would have to purchase any new air frames, and there would be zero scope limitations.
Flyhayes is offline  
Old 08-07-2020, 07:46 AM
  #127  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by brocklee9000 View Post
So again, whether it’s a literal aircraft performance limitation or a financial performance limitation, we won’t see mainline planes or pilots in a lot of these cities. Not when some airports are small, loads are small, and a full regional crew costs as much per hour as one mainline captain. Regionals are here to stay, and in these times it seems like FFD might be marginally more secure than WO. That’s my opinion and I’m sticking to it for now.
Yes, RJ's or "small jets" are here to stay, have been since the DC-9 and 737-100.

Just a question of how small, how many, and who's flying them. If a recovery is relatively quick, it will be back to business as usual soon enough. If this turns into an extended slo-mo industry train wreck, regionals might grow or shrink dramatically, only time will tell.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-07-2020, 12:50 PM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GoFaster's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 161
Default

Originally Posted by Flyhayes View Post
Who said anything about being absorbed? There would be plenty of soon to be furloughed mainline pilots to fly them. It's not like they would have to purchase any new air frames, and there would be zero scope limitations.

Yeah but then they’d have to pay real wages and there’d be no one to pit each other against in the race to the bottom.
GoFaster is offline  
Old 08-08-2020, 04:54 AM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ItnStln's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,584
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
1- Things will get better as soon as the election is over in November. The vast majority of the hysteria of the virus now is politically driven.=12pt
This
filler
ItnStln is online now  
Old 08-08-2020, 05:38 AM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 220
Default

Originally Posted by GoFaster View Post
Yeah but then they’d have to pay real wages and there’d be no one to pit each other against in the race to the bottom.
This is correct ALPA has argued for this to prevent furloughs of mainline pilots. Also, it would benefit the rj pilot in the long run bc then you can just get hired at a mainline, maybe on a B pay scale.

But, UA has shot this down multiple times bc financially it doesnt make sense to them, even at a B scale pilot pay. Also they would then be responsible for the aircraft such as maintenance, insurance, and liability.

For example, if a rj messes up some how and gets sued by a pax, UA is not legally held accountable.
point80 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Inop2
Envoy Airlines
4
03-28-2018 02:25 PM
Inop2
American
5
03-18-2018 10:05 AM
Inop2
Piedmont Airlines
2
03-18-2018 05:44 AM
sinkrate3278
Aviation Law
9
02-16-2011 12:41 AM
pwdrhound
Major
6
11-13-2010 06:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices