Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Lost decade 2.0?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2020 | 03:32 PM
  #111  
brocklee9000's Avatar
I Pass the Butter
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT
Regional flying isn’t going away just regional carriers. There isn’t demand to support all of them, just most of them

and a 200 seat a320 won’t replace 76 seat rj’s plenty of solid regional markets left
And there are plenty of airports regionals operate in where a mainline plane would never be able to go. It’s not always a matter of consolidating 5 daily flight to 1 weekly flight, or maintaining slot/gate space, or whatever frequency is required at small airports for EAS agreements. Sometimes it comes down to size and performance. You’ll never see mainline at State College, Flagstaff, Aspen, Ithaca, or any number of small airports.
Reply
Old 08-05-2020 | 04:04 PM
  #112  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by brocklee9000
You’ll never see mainline at State College, Flagstaff, Aspen, Ithaca, or any number of small airports.
you’d be surprised where 727’s landed in 1981

Very few airfields actually limited by runway length
Reply
Old 08-05-2020 | 04:11 PM
  #113  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,132
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT
you’d be surprised where 727’s landed in 1981

Very few airfields actually limited by runway length
Yup, they did milk runs, multiple small towns in loop from the hub.

Most small town muni airports got runways long enough for jets back in the 50's and 60's. Concrete was cheap back then.

I think you can count on both (or maybe one) hands the US airports which currently have commercial service and are severely limited by performance for NB's.

The real issue is frequency. Given travel habits, one or two round-robin services was plenty back in the golden age. But today people are busy, and travel casually, so they like frequency options. More than anything else that's the RJ sweet spot.
Reply
Old 08-05-2020 | 05:06 PM
  #114  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777

The real issue is frequency.
yes. In the day they had frequency with half full 727’s at $$$

only viable option now is full(ish) RJ’s at $
Reply
Old 08-05-2020 | 05:15 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,567
Likes: 229
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by brocklee9000
Sometimes it comes down to size and performance. You’ll never see mainline at State College, Flagstaff, Aspen, Ithaca, or any number of small airports.
a 717 could do ITH or SCE with minimal changes to the ramp. The A220 has the performance for ASE but wings are too long and it’s too heavy for local ordinances. Don’t forget the 737-700/A319 have comparable/ better short field performance to a CRJ200
Reply
Old 08-05-2020 | 05:32 PM
  #116  
ninerdriver's Avatar
Porco Rosso
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
Don’t forget the 737-700/A319 have comparable/ better short field performance to a CRJ200
I thought everything had better short-field performance than a 200. Except a 900.
Reply
Old 08-06-2020 | 08:46 AM
  #117  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Admiral
Default

Originally Posted by brocklee9000
And there are plenty of airports regionals operate in where a mainline plane would never be able to go. It’s not always a matter of consolidating 5 daily flight to 1 weekly flight, or maintaining slot/gate space, or whatever frequency is required at small airports for EAS agreements. Sometimes it comes down to size and performance. You’ll never see mainline at State College, Flagstaff, Aspen, Ithaca, or any number of small airports.
Nothing is stopping mainline from operating their own 175's.
Reply
Old 08-06-2020 | 08:50 AM
  #118  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Admiral
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity
Great job guys. All that scope language and AA is still selling seats on a subcontracted airbus.
Far far from it. It's a code share agreement, which is a huge difference. As far as I know, it only applies to certain parts of the route structure.
Reply
Old 08-06-2020 | 09:50 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flyhayes
Far far from it. It's a code share agreement, which is a huge difference. As far as I know, it only applies to certain parts of the route structure.
Only flights to/from NY and BOS, excluding JB’s future London flights (maybe some others).
Reply
Old 08-06-2020 | 12:09 PM
  #120  
brocklee9000's Avatar
I Pass the Butter
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flyhayes
Nothing is stopping mainline from operating their own 175's.
yes, but that subject has been argued to death for years. We would all love to be absorbed by a major. They’ll never do it though.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Inop2
Envoy Airlines
4
03-28-2018 02:25 PM
Inop2
American
5
03-18-2018 10:05 AM
Inop2
Piedmont Airlines
2
03-18-2018 05:44 AM
sinkrate3278
Aviation Law
9
02-16-2011 12:41 AM
pwdrhound
Major
6
11-13-2010 06:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices