AVIATE don’t join !
#41
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
No idea. I haven't had to deal with this nonsense for 6 years now. I'd assume you're not blacklisted.
#44
The last class only had four aviate, the rest were all military. Zero off the street hires. With UA having cut their hiring to roughly 925 in 2025, the vast majority of new hires will be UMPP and Aviate. Off the street is going to be extremely difficult unless there is a major change to aircraft deliveries.
#45
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
The last class only had four aviate, the rest were all military. Zero off the street hires. With UA having cut their hiring to roughly 925 in 2025, the vast majority of new hires will be UMPP and Aviate. Off the street is going to be extremely difficult unless there is a major change to aircraft deliveries.
I currently have a CJO from a ULCC and an AVIATE 121 partner, both with upcoming class dates. Just about everyone has recommended that I choose the ULCC, that QOL will be much better, with better training, treatment, professionalism etc. But the path to UA seems significantly faster through Aviate than a ULCC (which wasn't true a couple of years ago) and will probably remain that way given all the Aviate pilots coming through the pipeline.
What are your thoughts? Is the risk of getting stuck at a regional (ie upgrade failure) worth the potential time saved? Is life at a regional for 3/4 years that much worse than at ULCC for someone with kids? Appreciate any insight.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 257
From: A320 FO
Yes, I have heard this as well.
I currently have a CJO from a ULCC and an AVIATE 121 partner, both with upcoming class dates. Just about everyone has recommended that I choose the ULCC, that QOL will be much better, with better training, treatment, professionalism etc. But the path to UA seems significantly faster through Aviate than a ULCC (which wasn't true a couple of years ago) and will probably remain that way given all the Aviate pilots coming through the pipeline.
What are your thoughts? Is the risk of getting stuck at a regional (ie upgrade failure) worth the potential time saved? Is life at a regional for 3/4 years that much worse than at ULCC for someone with kids? Appreciate any insight.
I currently have a CJO from a ULCC and an AVIATE 121 partner, both with upcoming class dates. Just about everyone has recommended that I choose the ULCC, that QOL will be much better, with better training, treatment, professionalism etc. But the path to UA seems significantly faster through Aviate than a ULCC (which wasn't true a couple of years ago) and will probably remain that way given all the Aviate pilots coming through the pipeline.
What are your thoughts? Is the risk of getting stuck at a regional (ie upgrade failure) worth the potential time saved? Is life at a regional for 3/4 years that much worse than at ULCC for someone with kids? Appreciate any insight.
You have a family. What is health insurance like at the regional VS LCC? What about disability insurance? These are the things that matter if you end up there for 10 years. If you were single I'd push career progression chances above all else but you are not.
#47
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 284
Likes: 76
Yes, I have heard this as well.
I currently have a CJO from a ULCC and an AVIATE 121 partner, both with upcoming class dates. Just about everyone has recommended that I choose the ULCC, that QOL will be much better, with better training, treatment, professionalism etc. But the path to UA seems significantly faster through Aviate than a ULCC (which wasn't true a couple of years ago) and will probably remain that way given all the Aviate pilots coming through the pipeline.
What are your thoughts? Is the risk of getting stuck at a regional (ie upgrade failure) worth the potential time saved? Is life at a regional for 3/4 years that much worse than at ULCC for someone with kids? Appreciate any insight.
I currently have a CJO from a ULCC and an AVIATE 121 partner, both with upcoming class dates. Just about everyone has recommended that I choose the ULCC, that QOL will be much better, with better training, treatment, professionalism etc. But the path to UA seems significantly faster through Aviate than a ULCC (which wasn't true a couple of years ago) and will probably remain that way given all the Aviate pilots coming through the pipeline.
What are your thoughts? Is the risk of getting stuck at a regional (ie upgrade failure) worth the potential time saved? Is life at a regional for 3/4 years that much worse than at ULCC for someone with kids? Appreciate any insight.
#48
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 435
Likes: 85
Yes, I have heard this as well.
I currently have a CJO from a ULCC and an AVIATE 121 partner, both with upcoming class dates. Just about everyone has recommended that I choose the ULCC, that QOL will be much better, with better training, treatment, professionalism etc. But the path to UA seems significantly faster through Aviate than a ULCC (which wasn't true a couple of years ago) and will probably remain that way given all the Aviate pilots coming through the pipeline.
What are your thoughts? Is the risk of getting stuck at a regional (ie upgrade failure) worth the potential time saved? Is life at a regional for 3/4 years that much worse than at ULCC for someone with kids? Appreciate any insight.
I currently have a CJO from a ULCC and an AVIATE 121 partner, both with upcoming class dates. Just about everyone has recommended that I choose the ULCC, that QOL will be much better, with better training, treatment, professionalism etc. But the path to UA seems significantly faster through Aviate than a ULCC (which wasn't true a couple of years ago) and will probably remain that way given all the Aviate pilots coming through the pipeline.
What are your thoughts? Is the risk of getting stuck at a regional (ie upgrade failure) worth the potential time saved? Is life at a regional for 3/4 years that much worse than at ULCC for someone with kids? Appreciate any insight.
#49
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 36
Likes: 20
#50
So, I'd plan on upgrading at either the ULCC or the Regional. If everything else is equal, I'd go to the ULCC. A junior Airbus CA will generally get street hired before a Junior RJ Captain. So, what's the upgrade time at the ULCC vs the regional? The regional jobs really aren't as bad as some say. The contracts at the better regionals have changed so much that they look more like the ULCC/LCC contracts from the late teens. So yeah, the wages and work rules are better at a LCC/ULCC but even the regionals are real jobs these days. Finally, where do you live? is the commute the same for the regional as for the ULCC, or do you live in base. I'd take living in base at the regional over commuting to the ULCC all day, every day. It makes it a completely different job. The quality of life improvement cannot be over stressed.
Don't go by who's getting hired right now. Don't let the fact that it's military and aviate mostly right now effect that decision without considerin the big picture. If things do NOT change then yes, go with the aviate program. However, if you believe the hiring will restart in earnest once the Boeing/Airbus/Pratt issues are resolved then they'll be back street hiring just like last time. If you haven't even started yet, your'e a good two years away from being hirable as they're going to go through all the Captains first, plus the military and the Aviate. Making a decision based upon who's being hired now is foolish, as the industry changes very rapidly. We all know the rapid crazy hiring is coming back once the slowdown is resolved.... absent a war or giant economic collapse it's a forgone conclusion.
Lots to consider when looking at the crystal ball. I'd do the ULCC unless you live in the regional base.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



