Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Is the regional model imploding? >

Is the regional model imploding?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Is the regional model imploding?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2022 | 12:34 PM
  #111  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Default

The Major Airlines that want to save the regionals will end up just creating ab-initio. Some have already started this process like United and their Aviate Academy. The one missing link is who is paying for training.

It’s not hard to see a future where United (or insert airline) pays for all or most of your training. Maybe students have to show up with a PPL, but United pays for the rest. You then instruct at their Academy until hitting the ATP mins, then go to the regional of their choice where you are contracted for 5-7 years before you can move up to the big boys.

That would solve their staffing problems, but the cost of paying for initial training is a huge hurdle that hasn’t really been necessary in this country yet. It will be interesting to see what plays out.
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 12:44 PM
  #112  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,250
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by kaputt
The Major Airlines that want to save the regionals will end up just creating ab-initio. Some have already started this process like United and their Aviate Academy. The one missing link is who is paying for training.

It’s not hard to see a future where United (or insert airline) pays for all or most of your training. Maybe students have to show up with a PPL, but United pays for the rest. You then instruct at their Academy until hitting the ATP mins, then go to the regional of their choice where you are contracted for 5-7 years before you can move up to the big boys.

That would solve their staffing problems, but the cost of paying for initial training is a huge hurdle that hasn’t really been necessary in this country yet. It will be interesting to see what plays out.
That MIGHT solve the strategic problem but it won’t solve the tactical one - which is too many pilots leaving the regionals before they have upgraded and flown enough to pay back the 121 SIC hours they got from the regional.

Right now they are looking at mandatory upgrades on FOs who don’t WANT to upgrade (unless you give them the additional stripe as a ‘participation’ trophy) and paying huge bonuses and salaries for DECs. And they are running out of potential DECs.

Barring a recession and/or a change in the 1000 hr upgrade rule they are in trouble.
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 12:46 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pilsung
Could the FAA reduce the 1,000 hours of SIC 121 time required for upgrade, to 750 hours? Would this have any meaningful benefit?
I got a better idea. Let the airlines pay, on a continual long term basis, what the market requires to hire that experience. Problem solved.

The airlines, and their previous compensation packages, resulted in the current hiring environment (along with new people clamoring to get in through short cuts). We don't need to change safety regulations to fix the problem the airlines created.
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 02:06 PM
  #114  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
That MIGHT solve the strategic problem but it won’t solve the tactical one - which is too many pilots leaving the regionals before they have upgraded and flown enough to pay back the 121 SIC hours they got from the regional.
Well the ab-initio pipeline would most certainly require the pilot to upgrade to Captain as part of their contract.
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 02:21 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kaputt
Well the ab-initio pipeline would most certainly require the pilot to upgrade to Captain as part of their contract.
And what he’s saying is they need captains to tactically fill the gap until the strategic ab initio plan grows new ones from seed. The system still falls apart otherwise.
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 04:05 PM
  #116  
Isn’t that a sauce?
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Default

Barring a major recession; UA and DL could hire all of the AA regional pilots in the next five years while AA could hire all the UA or DL regional feed. This doesn’t even include the LCCs with their own hiring needs for growth and attrition.
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 04:31 PM
  #117  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,250
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Twr199
Barring a major recession; UA and DL could hire all of the AA regional pilots in the next five years while AA could hire all the UA or DL regional feed. This doesn’t even include the LCCs with their own hiring needs for growth and attrition.
Or the ACMIs.
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 04:32 PM
  #118  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,250
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by kaputt
Well the ab-initio pipeline would most certainly require the pilot to upgrade to Captain as part of their contract.
Would such a contract be enforceable?
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 07:04 PM
  #119  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Would such a contract be enforceable?
Kind of a silly question. Are forced upgrades enforceable if it’s in the pilot contract?
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 07:29 PM
  #120  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,250
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
Kind of a silly question. Are forced upgrades enforceable if it’s in the pilot contract?
this has often been discussed on APC before. Some are, some apparently aren’t, depending on the contract and the state you are employed in.

Training contract

Breaking Training Contract Help

And, a confused bit of case law…

https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...aining-lawsuit

So maybe not all that silly…
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captkdobbs
Delta
1523
09-27-2022 12:29 PM
Precontact
Cargo
10
08-25-2008 09:06 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
papacharlie
Regional
39
01-27-2008 05:01 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices