Is the regional model imploding?
#71
Absolutely. However the idea thats it'll go away completely...I'm not so sure. The legacies wanted their C scale but they also wanted service to airports that they couldn't profitably serve that would supplement the hub feed and fill their planes. They may want to put a 220 on every RJ route now but they simply cant do it. They dont have the planes and they certainly dont have the pilots. If they did they would have taken the flying back as soon as regionals started to pay $216/hr. Why contract that out when you can take it in house? Answer: They have no choice.
I think the real question is whether or not the CURRENT regional model is sustainable rather than imploding. They have been forced to pay starting wages that compete with the legacies and Captain pay that would theoretically keep pilots from going to at least the ULCC's. How long will that last? Most regional pilots will still leave to go to the big 6 which is still an astronomical number of pilots that will leave. I think that several regionals will go away and a few big ones will survive in a smaller form. Best guesses how long the hiring continues and how long until the regionals no longer need to pay these wages and declare chap 11 and reduce those contracts back to a true C scale...
I think the real question is whether or not the CURRENT regional model is sustainable rather than imploding. They have been forced to pay starting wages that compete with the legacies and Captain pay that would theoretically keep pilots from going to at least the ULCC's. How long will that last? Most regional pilots will still leave to go to the big 6 which is still an astronomical number of pilots that will leave. I think that several regionals will go away and a few big ones will survive in a smaller form. Best guesses how long the hiring continues and how long until the regionals no longer need to pay these wages and declare chap 11 and reduce those contracts back to a true C scale...
Regionals are bleeding people with high SIC and the ones left behind are not upgrade eligible while CAs are leaving without flying long enough to allow the FO next to them to become upgrade eligible. Right now regionals are surviving on DECs (that are becoming increasingly rare) and “lifer” CAs too close to retirement to benefit economically by a jump to the majors. It isn’t’t sustainable.
Barring a serious recession (which might happen) it’s a negative feedback loop. A death spiral.
#72
The problem IMHO is who the majors are hiring. If the majors were hiring a random mix of people from the regional seniority list it MIGHT be possible for the regionals to simply get smaller but to stay viable. But that isn’t the case. They are disproportionately hiring CAs and senior FOs. And that causes them to run afoul of the 1000 hr SIC before upgrade rule.
Regionals are bleeding people with high SIC and the ones left behind are not upgrade eligible while CAs are leaving without flying long enough to allow the FO next to them to become upgrade eligible. Right now regionals are surviving on DECs (that are becoming increasingly rare) and “lifer” CAs too close to retirement to benefit economically by a jump to the majors. It isn’t’t sustainable.
Barring a serious recession (which might happen) it’s a negative feedback loop. A death spiral.
Regionals are bleeding people with high SIC and the ones left behind are not upgrade eligible while CAs are leaving without flying long enough to allow the FO next to them to become upgrade eligible. Right now regionals are surviving on DECs (that are becoming increasingly rare) and “lifer” CAs too close to retirement to benefit economically by a jump to the majors. It isn’t’t sustainable.
Barring a serious recession (which might happen) it’s a negative feedback loop. A death spiral.
It’s critical care but this is just supply chain. 1 year from now the problem will be over. We will have sufficient upgrade eligible FOs. Part of this problem is the LCCs and legacies that started hiring without TPIC. Shortly they will have enough.
#73
#74
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Pretending that the purpose of the regionals is to reduce the liability of the airline when an inexperienced crew kills people is absurd. Their only purpose (directly stated by Kirby) was to create a C scale wage. In that regard they have been utterly fantastic over the past two decades. Every single pilot should be cheering the end of that nightmare.
But liability is a factor, and underwriting is an art as well as science. Insurance costs less if you can articulate the experience and quality of your pilots. This is not my speculation, but fact from airline management people. They do proclaim their hiring standards to make their case to under-writers. Some may be self-insured IIRC, but as public companies they have to self-insure to adequate levels, and there are accounting standards which dictate some methodology.
That's not the reason for FFD, but it's a fringe benefit. If they bring small jets in house, and hire CFI's presumably the calculus would change.
#75
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
I find the 737 was more difficult than the CRJ-700 and EMB-135/140/145. Maybe difficult isn’t the right word—maybe just more “busy.”
The Saab 340 and ATR were much harder than the RJs.
I also find that the current 121 training environment is the least difficult and most friendly that it has ever been.
The Saab 340 and ATR were much harder than the RJs.
I also find that the current 121 training environment is the least difficult and most friendly that it has ever been.
#77
If you do not have enough CAs flying to generate enough SIC hours to get your FOs up to enough hours to upgrade themselves its more than just supply chain, it’s classic theory of constraints. No amount of shoving 0-121 time FOs in at the bottom will help if you are losing SIC experience hours to departing FOs and CAs faster than your remaining CAs can generate them. In fact, the more FOs you toss in at the bottom the fewer hours each will fly and the longer it will be before they can upgrade, allowing even more time for the majors to hire away your CAs and near-eligible FOs.
#78
On Reserve
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
If you do not have enough CAs flying to generate enough SIC hours to get your FOs up to enough hours to upgrade themselves its more than just supply chain, it’s classic theory of constraints. No amount of shoving 0-121 time FOs in at the bottom will help if you are losing SIC experience hours to departing FOs and CAs faster than your remaining CAs can generate them. In fact, the more FOs you toss in at the bottom the fewer hours each will fly and the longer it will be before they can upgrade, allowing even more time for the majors to hire away your CAs and near-eligible FOs.
#79
If you do not have enough CAs flying to generate enough SIC hours to get your FOs up to enough hours to upgrade themselves its more than just supply chain, it’s classic theory of constraints. No amount of shoving 0-121 time FOs in at the bottom will help if you are losing SIC experience hours to departing FOs and CAs faster than your remaining CAs can generate them. In fact, the more FOs you toss in at the bottom the fewer hours each will fly and the longer it will be before they can upgrade, allowing even more time for the majors to hire away your CAs and near-eligible FOs.
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
They will leave before they get the hours to upgrade. Or they will get the hours to upgrade and leave instead of upgrading. Or they will upgrade for a few weeks and then leave. Either way, it’s not a sustainable model
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



