Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Is the regional model imploding? >

Is the regional model imploding?


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Is the regional model imploding?

Old 11-05-2022 | 01:35 PM
  #71  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,249
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Floy
Absolutely. However the idea thats it'll go away completely...I'm not so sure. The legacies wanted their C scale but they also wanted service to airports that they couldn't profitably serve that would supplement the hub feed and fill their planes. They may want to put a 220 on every RJ route now but they simply cant do it. They dont have the planes and they certainly dont have the pilots. If they did they would have taken the flying back as soon as regionals started to pay $216/hr. Why contract that out when you can take it in house? Answer: They have no choice.

I think the real question is whether or not the CURRENT regional model is sustainable rather than imploding. They have been forced to pay starting wages that compete with the legacies and Captain pay that would theoretically keep pilots from going to at least the ULCC's. How long will that last? Most regional pilots will still leave to go to the big 6 which is still an astronomical number of pilots that will leave. I think that several regionals will go away and a few big ones will survive in a smaller form. Best guesses how long the hiring continues and how long until the regionals no longer need to pay these wages and declare chap 11 and reduce those contracts back to a true C scale...
The problem IMHO is who the majors are hiring. If the majors were hiring a random mix of people from the regional seniority list it MIGHT be possible for the regionals to simply get smaller but to stay viable. But that isn’t the case. They are disproportionately hiring CAs and senior FOs. And that causes them to run afoul of the 1000 hr SIC before upgrade rule.


Regionals are bleeding people with high SIC and the ones left behind are not upgrade eligible while CAs are leaving without flying long enough to allow the FO next to them to become upgrade eligible. Right now regionals are surviving on DECs (that are becoming increasingly rare) and “lifer” CAs too close to retirement to benefit economically by a jump to the majors. It isn’t’t sustainable.

Barring a serious recession (which might happen) it’s a negative feedback loop. A death spiral.
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 02:04 PM
  #72  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
The problem IMHO is who the majors are hiring. If the majors were hiring a random mix of people from the regional seniority list it MIGHT be possible for the regionals to simply get smaller but to stay viable. But that isn’t the case. They are disproportionately hiring CAs and senior FOs. And that causes them to run afoul of the 1000 hr SIC before upgrade rule.


Regionals are bleeding people with high SIC and the ones left behind are not upgrade eligible while CAs are leaving without flying long enough to allow the FO next to them to become upgrade eligible. Right now regionals are surviving on DECs (that are becoming increasingly rare) and “lifer” CAs too close to retirement to benefit economically by a jump to the majors. It isn’t’t sustainable.

Barring a serious recession (which might happen) it’s a negative feedback loop. A death spiral.

It’s critical care but this is just supply chain. 1 year from now the problem will be over. We will have sufficient upgrade eligible FOs. Part of this problem is the LCCs and legacies that started hiring without TPIC. Shortly they will have enough.
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 02:48 PM
  #73  
majorpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: Line holder
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlikespeed
okay okay…. But is a Miata a sports car? That’s the real debate

Only for people who don’t know/care what a sports car is…and yes, of course it is..same as a TR6, MG, Corvette or 308GTS.
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 03:00 PM
  #74  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,128
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by tallpilot

Pretending that the purpose of the regionals is to reduce the liability of the airline when an inexperienced crew kills people is absurd. Their only purpose (directly stated by Kirby) was to create a C scale wage. In that regard they have been utterly fantastic over the past two decades. Every single pilot should be cheering the end of that nightmare.
Yes, their primary purpose is lower wages, and that includes all labor not just pilots.

But liability is a factor, and underwriting is an art as well as science. Insurance costs less if you can articulate the experience and quality of your pilots. This is not my speculation, but fact from airline management people. They do proclaim their hiring standards to make their case to under-writers. Some may be self-insured IIRC, but as public companies they have to self-insure to adequate levels, and there are accounting standards which dictate some methodology.

That's not the reason for FFD, but it's a fringe benefit. If they bring small jets in house, and hire CFI's presumably the calculus would change.
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 03:07 PM
  #75  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
I find the 737 was more difficult than the CRJ-700 and EMB-135/140/145. Maybe difficult isn’t the right word—maybe just more “busy.”

The Saab 340 and ATR were much harder than the RJs.

I also find that the current 121 training environment is the least difficult and most friendly that it has ever been.
Dash 8 Q400 is the hardest type to fly currently in operation.
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 04:11 PM
  #76  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Clipper88
Dash 8 Q400 is the hardest type to fly currently in operation.
A ramper put the lie to this.
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 04:20 PM
  #77  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,249
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
It’s critical care but this is just supply chain. 1 year from now the problem will be over. We will have sufficient upgrade eligible FOs. Part of this problem is the LCCs and legacies that started hiring without TPIC. Shortly they will have enough.
If you do not have enough CAs flying to generate enough SIC hours to get your FOs up to enough hours to upgrade themselves its more than just supply chain, it’s classic theory of constraints. No amount of shoving 0-121 time FOs in at the bottom will help if you are losing SIC experience hours to departing FOs and CAs faster than your remaining CAs can generate them. In fact, the more FOs you toss in at the bottom the fewer hours each will fly and the longer it will be before they can upgrade, allowing even more time for the majors to hire away your CAs and near-eligible FOs.
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 05:53 PM
  #78  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
If you do not have enough CAs flying to generate enough SIC hours to get your FOs up to enough hours to upgrade themselves its more than just supply chain, it’s classic theory of constraints. No amount of shoving 0-121 time FOs in at the bottom will help if you are losing SIC experience hours to departing FOs and CAs faster than your remaining CAs can generate them. In fact, the more FOs you toss in at the bottom the fewer hours each will fly and the longer it will be before they can upgrade, allowing even more time for the majors to hire away your CAs and near-eligible FOs.
I disagree with about 80% of what you post, but in this one area, you are absolutely correct. Classic systems theory in action. Bertalanffy would be proud of your analysis
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 08:04 PM
  #79  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
If you do not have enough CAs flying to generate enough SIC hours to get your FOs up to enough hours to upgrade themselves its more than just supply chain, it’s classic theory of constraints. No amount of shoving 0-121 time FOs in at the bottom will help if you are losing SIC experience hours to departing FOs and CAs faster than your remaining CAs can generate them. In fact, the more FOs you toss in at the bottom the fewer hours each will fly and the longer it will be before they can upgrade, allowing even more time for the majors to hire away your CAs and near-eligible FOs.
They will eventually get the hours to upgrade and will and the problem will be solved. They are not getting zero hours. The senior will fly more. Your assertion is true if the flying is evenly spread among the junior. It’s not.
Reply
Old 11-06-2022 | 03:51 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
They will eventually get the hours to upgrade and will and the problem will be solved. They are not getting zero hours. The senior will fly more. Your assertion is true if the flying is evenly spread among the junior. It’s not.
They will leave before they get the hours to upgrade. Or they will get the hours to upgrade and leave instead of upgrading. Or they will upgrade for a few weeks and then leave. Either way, it’s not a sustainable model
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captkdobbs
Delta
1523
09-27-2022 12:29 PM
Precontact
Cargo
10
08-25-2008 09:06 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
papacharlie
Regional
39
01-27-2008 05:01 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices