Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Is the regional model imploding? >

Is the regional model imploding?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Is the regional model imploding?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2022 | 08:53 AM
  #101  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,131
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Cglyn
I would say no matter your experience, if you get the type rating you get the type rating and that’s the end of it.
It's not that simple

The regionals would *really* like it to be, but plenty of folks with a type rating flunk 121 IOE.
Reply
Old 11-10-2022 | 09:30 AM
  #102  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: B200
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
Chalk this up to natural selection in the airline industry.
What about natural selection in the C Suite?

Oh yeah, I forgot, they're worthy and we aren't.
Reply
Old 11-10-2022 | 09:34 AM
  #103  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: B200
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
i disagree. Look at the order books for new narrow bodies at the majors. Then look at those at the regionals.

https://i.ibb.co/NNgmXx1/E504-F7-FA-...AB285-F4-D.jpg

Most current hiring at legacies only covers their incentivized early retirements for COVID.

The majors will need to replace their FUTURE retirees and staff those new aircraft while the ULCCs (including all the new kids on the block) and LCCs continue their own expansions. And the regionals have already nearly exhausted the DEC supply.
Great posts.

The answer is demand destruction, at least that is what our overlords from the Chicago School would dictate, and what appears to be evolving from the dark and hallowed halls of the managerial banks. Who wins is a meaningful question, because while airline travel is a luxury is some countries, it is almost essential in the U.S.

Great thread and thanks for posting it. And with regard to the regional model, F*ck innovation and the model that paid me $17 bucks an hour to fly a jet out of America's capital city.
Reply
Old 11-10-2022 | 04:41 PM
  #104  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default Video - "Death of the US regional airlines?"

Here is a surprisingly comprehensive video on this subject, made by a (European) airline pilot for his YouTube channel.

Title: "Is this the death of the US regional airlines?"
https://youtu.be/oYM8dG-ZGRo
Reply
Old 11-10-2022 | 06:55 PM
  #105  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by ComanchePilot
Here is a surprisingly comprehensive video on this subject, made by a (European) airline pilot for his YouTube channel.

Title: "Is this the death of the US regional airlines?"
https://youtu.be/oYM8dG-ZGRo

Very well done!
Reply
Old 11-11-2022 | 03:19 PM
  #106  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Default

Could the FAA reduce the 1,000 hours of SIC 121 time required for upgrade, to 750 hours? Would this have any meaningful benefit?
Reply
Old 11-11-2022 | 04:28 PM
  #107  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pilsung
Could the FAA reduce the 1,000 hours of SIC 121 time required for upgrade, to 750 hours? Would this have any meaningful benefit?
I’d think hard and long about that. For many people 1000hrs just isn’t enough experience to really take on that pic responsibility. The faa minimum imo is already pretty low and many airlines required more than that only to now drop those required to the faa minimum. CA upgrades have no where near the same pass rate that initial has.
Reply
Old 11-11-2022 | 07:28 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Pilsung
Could the FAA reduce the 1,000 hours of SIC 121 time required for upgrade, to 750 hours? Would this have any meaningful benefit?
By adding special circumstances to have ATP at lower than 1500 hrs, we ve already lowered the threshold for upgrade down the line. I see no benefit to lower it further.
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 06:00 AM
  #109  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Pilsung
Could the FAA reduce the 1,000 hours of SIC 121 time required for upgrade, to 750 hours? Would this have any meaningful benefit?
I'd rather have them lower the ATP rule requirements (which I am very against) then that. I will continue to write my lawmakers as a professional pilot and a constituent every time these rules are challenged. They have been a blessing for pilot QOL and pay along with the increased and undeniable safety (sorry, statistics don't lie) that have come from it.
Reply
Old 11-12-2022 | 09:00 AM
  #110  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,250
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Pilsung
Could the FAA reduce the 1,000 hours of SIC 121 time required for upgrade, to 750 hours? Would this have any meaningful benefit?
Could they? Sure. Not without risk, but anything is possible. Would they? Unlikely.

Would it help the regionals if they did? Equally unlikely. Those uncomfortable with immediate upgrade would have even greater reason to find themselves a ULCC where they could hang out for a few years before going to their career destination.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captkdobbs
Delta
1523
09-27-2022 12:29 PM
Precontact
Cargo
10
08-25-2008 09:06 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
papacharlie
Regional
39
01-27-2008 05:01 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices