Is the regional model imploding?
#61
I find the 737 was more difficult than the CRJ-700 and EMB-135/140/145. Maybe difficult isn’t the right word—maybe just more “busy.”
The Saab 340 and ATR were much harder than the RJs.
I also find that the current 121 training environment is the least difficult and most friendly that it has ever been.
The Saab 340 and ATR were much harder than the RJs.
I also find that the current 121 training environment is the least difficult and most friendly that it has ever been.
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 212
You can get way behind in a 737 and get in trouble in almost all aspects (i.e. flying, or FMS, or systems, etc.) a lot easier and quicker than any Regional aircraft. Anybody who tells you different or that it is basically "the same" is being either disingenuous or woefully out of touch. Yoou know the type, they've been in the 737 way too long to know different, basically any Legacy guy who has been there more than 10 years which is why they always give such horrible advice to new pilots.
#63
I’m just gonna say it.
they fly 737s/320s all the time at 250 hours in EU. You’re all arguing with your egos.
There’s also the principle of primacy. If you’re gonna fly the 737 your whole career you have zero negative transference if it’s your first jet.
I think we can all agree these comments including this one are a waste of our time.
now. Let’s talk about how we know more about flying any airplane than management. Because we can all agree with that one! Am I right lads and and lasses?
they fly 737s/320s all the time at 250 hours in EU. You’re all arguing with your egos.
There’s also the principle of primacy. If you’re gonna fly the 737 your whole career you have zero negative transference if it’s your first jet.
I think we can all agree these comments including this one are a waste of our time.
now. Let’s talk about how we know more about flying any airplane than management. Because we can all agree with that one! Am I right lads and and lasses?
#64
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 525
Likes: 25
From: 320
I’m just gonna say it.
they fly 737s/320s all the time at 250 hours in EU. You’re all arguing with your egos.
There’s also the principle of primacy. If you’re gonna fly the 737 your whole career you have zero negative transference if it’s your first jet.
I think we can all agree these comments including this one are a waste of our time.
now. Let’s talk about how we know more about flying any airplane than management. Because we can all agree with that one! Am I right lads and and lasses?
they fly 737s/320s all the time at 250 hours in EU. You’re all arguing with your egos.
There’s also the principle of primacy. If you’re gonna fly the 737 your whole career you have zero negative transference if it’s your first jet.
I think we can all agree these comments including this one are a waste of our time.
now. Let’s talk about how we know more about flying any airplane than management. Because we can all agree with that one! Am I right lads and and lasses?
#65
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
#66
I’m just gonna say it.
they fly 737s/320s all the time at 250 hours in EU. You’re all arguing with your egos.
There’s also the principle of primacy. If you’re gonna fly the 737 your whole career you have zero negative transference if it’s your first jet.
I think we can all agree these comments including this one are a waste of our time.
now. Let’s talk about how we know more about flying any airplane than management. Because we can all agree with that one! Am I right lads and and lasses?
they fly 737s/320s all the time at 250 hours in EU. You’re all arguing with your egos.
There’s also the principle of primacy. If you’re gonna fly the 737 your whole career you have zero negative transference if it’s your first jet.
I think we can all agree these comments including this one are a waste of our time.
now. Let’s talk about how we know more about flying any airplane than management. Because we can all agree with that one! Am I right lads and and lasses?
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 257
From: A320 FO
They do indeed. I attribute that primarily to multi crew licenses and no solo time during initial training.
I agree with the person who said we're arguing with our own egos. The advantage to starting out at a large carrier instead of the current regional model is the experience of mentors.
In the 80s (the last time people with wet commercials were hired at big airlines) new hires went into the engineer seat and watched airline operations for a year or two before upgrading to the right seat. The captains had decades of experience and in most cases were able to provide effective mentorship.
I've seen plenty of competent and safe 25 year old captains over the past few years but they lack depth of experience and having them as the primary mentors for the next generation of civilian pilots is unwise.
Pretending that the purpose of the regionals is to reduce the liability of the airline when an inexperienced crew kills people is absurd. Their only purpose (directly stated by Kirby) was to create a C scale wage. In that regard they have been utterly fantastic over the past two decades. Every single pilot should be cheering the end of that nightmare.
I agree with the person who said we're arguing with our own egos. The advantage to starting out at a large carrier instead of the current regional model is the experience of mentors.
In the 80s (the last time people with wet commercials were hired at big airlines) new hires went into the engineer seat and watched airline operations for a year or two before upgrading to the right seat. The captains had decades of experience and in most cases were able to provide effective mentorship.
I've seen plenty of competent and safe 25 year old captains over the past few years but they lack depth of experience and having them as the primary mentors for the next generation of civilian pilots is unwise.
Pretending that the purpose of the regionals is to reduce the liability of the airline when an inexperienced crew kills people is absurd. Their only purpose (directly stated by Kirby) was to create a C scale wage. In that regard they have been utterly fantastic over the past two decades. Every single pilot should be cheering the end of that nightmare.
#70
On Reserve
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 103
Likes: 6
Pretending that the purpose of the regionals is to reduce the liability of the airline when an inexperienced crew kills people is absurd. Their only purpose (directly stated by Kirby) was to create a C scale wage. In that regard they have been utterly fantastic over the past two decades. Every single pilot should be cheering the end of that nightmare.
I think the real question is whether or not the CURRENT regional model is sustainable rather than imploding. They have been forced to pay starting wages that compete with the legacies and Captain pay that would theoretically keep pilots from going to at least the ULCC's. How long will that last? Most regional pilots will still leave to go to the big 6 which is still an astronomical number of pilots that will leave. I think that several regionals will go away and a few big ones will survive in a smaller form. Best guesses how long the hiring continues and how long until the regionals no longer need to pay these wages and declare chap 11 and reduce those contracts back to a true C scale...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



