Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Is the regional model imploding? >

Is the regional model imploding?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Is the regional model imploding?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-2022 | 08:23 AM
  #61  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,578
Likes: 337
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

I find the 737 was more difficult than the CRJ-700 and EMB-135/140/145. Maybe difficult isn’t the right word—maybe just more “busy.”

The Saab 340 and ATR were much harder than the RJs.

I also find that the current 121 training environment is the least difficult and most friendly that it has ever been.
Reply
Old 11-04-2022 | 08:30 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 212
Default

You can get way behind in a 737 and get in trouble in almost all aspects (i.e. flying, or FMS, or systems, etc.) a lot easier and quicker than any Regional aircraft. Anybody who tells you different or that it is basically "the same" is being either disingenuous or woefully out of touch. Yoou know the type, they've been in the 737 way too long to know different, basically any Legacy guy who has been there more than 10 years which is why they always give such horrible advice to new pilots.
Reply
Old 11-04-2022 | 11:04 AM
  #63  
VisionWings's Avatar
A321
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 251
Likes: 37
Default

I’m just gonna say it.

they fly 737s/320s all the time at 250 hours in EU. You’re all arguing with your egos.


There’s also the principle of primacy. If you’re gonna fly the 737 your whole career you have zero negative transference if it’s your first jet.


I think we can all agree these comments including this one are a waste of our time.

now. Let’s talk about how we know more about flying any airplane than management. Because we can all agree with that one! Am I right lads and and lasses?
Reply
Old 11-04-2022 | 12:26 PM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 525
Likes: 25
From: 320
Default

Originally Posted by VisionWings
I’m just gonna say it.

they fly 737s/320s all the time at 250 hours in EU. You’re all arguing with your egos.


There’s also the principle of primacy. If you’re gonna fly the 737 your whole career you have zero negative transference if it’s your first jet.


I think we can all agree these comments including this one are a waste of our time.

now. Let’s talk about how we know more about flying any airplane than management. Because we can all agree with that one! Am I right lads and and lasses?
Is this the part where we try to say how experience doesn't matter? (It's rhetorical, I know you dont actually think that).. I know how I would have probably reacted at 250 hrs if we're down to emer-power at night...........Yea europe throws guys in the right seat at real low time, but lets be honest at 250 hrs your still pretty clueless even though you've passed a check ride......Sorry it's my fault, i've got this nasty habit of derailing threads recently.........
Reply
Old 11-04-2022 | 06:33 PM
  #65  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by VisionWings
I’m just gonna say it.

they fly 737s/320s all the time at 250 hours in EU. You’re all arguing with your egos.
They crash them more than we do.
Reply
Old 11-04-2022 | 08:35 PM
  #66  
Jetlikespeed's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 905
Likes: 197
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by VisionWings
I’m just gonna say it.

they fly 737s/320s all the time at 250 hours in EU. You’re all arguing with your egos.


There’s also the principle of primacy. If you’re gonna fly the 737 your whole career you have zero negative transference if it’s your first jet.


I think we can all agree these comments including this one are a waste of our time.

now. Let’s talk about how we know more about flying any airplane than management. Because we can all agree with that one! Am I right lads and and lasses?
okay okay…. But is a Miata a sports car? That’s the real debate
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 12:08 AM
  #67  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 483
Likes: 8
Default

God damnit.






YES
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 05:37 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlikespeed
okay okay…. But is a Miata a sports car? That’s the real debate
Does it matter if you wouldn't have one?
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 07:06 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 257
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
They crash them more than we do.
They do indeed. I attribute that primarily to multi crew licenses and no solo time during initial training.

I agree with the person who said we're arguing with our own egos. The advantage to starting out at a large carrier instead of the current regional model is the experience of mentors.

In the 80s (the last time people with wet commercials were hired at big airlines) new hires went into the engineer seat and watched airline operations for a year or two before upgrading to the right seat. The captains had decades of experience and in most cases were able to provide effective mentorship.

I've seen plenty of competent and safe 25 year old captains over the past few years but they lack depth of experience and having them as the primary mentors for the next generation of civilian pilots is unwise.

Pretending that the purpose of the regionals is to reduce the liability of the airline when an inexperienced crew kills people is absurd. Their only purpose (directly stated by Kirby) was to create a C scale wage. In that regard they have been utterly fantastic over the past two decades. Every single pilot should be cheering the end of that nightmare.
Reply
Old 11-05-2022 | 12:27 PM
  #70  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 103
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by tallpilot

Pretending that the purpose of the regionals is to reduce the liability of the airline when an inexperienced crew kills people is absurd. Their only purpose (directly stated by Kirby) was to create a C scale wage. In that regard they have been utterly fantastic over the past two decades. Every single pilot should be cheering the end of that nightmare.
Absolutely. However the idea thats it'll go away completely...I'm not so sure. The legacies wanted their C scale but they also wanted service to airports that they couldn't profitably serve that would supplement the hub feed and fill their planes. They may want to put a 220 on every RJ route now but they simply cant do it. They dont have the planes and they certainly dont have the pilots. If they did they would have taken the flying back as soon as regionals started to pay $216/hr. Why contract that out when you can take it in house? Answer: They have no choice.

I think the real question is whether or not the CURRENT regional model is sustainable rather than imploding. They have been forced to pay starting wages that compete with the legacies and Captain pay that would theoretically keep pilots from going to at least the ULCC's. How long will that last? Most regional pilots will still leave to go to the big 6 which is still an astronomical number of pilots that will leave. I think that several regionals will go away and a few big ones will survive in a smaller form. Best guesses how long the hiring continues and how long until the regionals no longer need to pay these wages and declare chap 11 and reduce those contracts back to a true C scale...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captkdobbs
Delta
1523
09-27-2022 12:29 PM
Precontact
Cargo
10
08-25-2008 09:06 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
papacharlie
Regional
39
01-27-2008 05:01 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices