Would this be bad???
#51
I wouldn't say a wet comm has poor atc skills. That's all dependent on the individual. I hear plenty of majors missing their callsign when I'm buzzing around here in SoCal.
What inherent suspicion with ATC, CA and dispatch? ATC has no idea whos flying the airplane. It could be the captain speaking for all they know. My point was with jet handling skills and simply keeping up with the aircraft as that's where a lot of adjustment is needed whether you are a CFI or wet commercial. CFIs and 250hr guys have two big things in common: they rarely to never exceed 130kts and have never flown a jet. The residual skills with dispatch, company operations and other ground school materials is a different thing and anyone can learn that stuff if they study it.
What inherent suspicion with ATC, CA and dispatch? ATC has no idea whos flying the airplane. It could be the captain speaking for all they know. My point was with jet handling skills and simply keeping up with the aircraft as that's where a lot of adjustment is needed whether you are a CFI or wet commercial. CFIs and 250hr guys have two big things in common: they rarely to never exceed 130kts and have never flown a jet. The residual skills with dispatch, company operations and other ground school materials is a different thing and anyone can learn that stuff if they study it.
Thanks for telling us how it is before you've been there.
#52
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
OKAY...if airlines are HIRING guys with 250-450tt, WHY not apply and take the job. If they are willing to take the reponsibility of teaching a low time guy, that is their prob.
TO all the ppl who think low time pilots in a jet is bad...WHAT would you guys do in the same situation? I am 99.9% sure you guys would take the job instead of being a CFI
TO all the ppl who think low time pilots in a jet is bad...WHAT would you guys do in the same situation? I am 99.9% sure you guys would take the job instead of being a CFI
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
OKAY...if airlines are HIRING guys with 250-450tt, WHY not apply and take the job. If they are willing to take the reponsibility of teaching a low time guy, that is their prob.
TO all the ppl who think low time pilots in a jet is bad...WHAT would you guys do in the same situation? I am 99.9% sure you guys would take the job instead of being a CFI
TO all the ppl who think low time pilots in a jet is bad...WHAT would you guys do in the same situation? I am 99.9% sure you guys would take the job instead of being a CFI
The idea of sitting around on your a$$ and not getting all the experience you can while you can just because you temporally don't have to is pure garbage. If you can get on with 300 hours by all means go, but don't let anyone hear anything that resembles a sense of entitlement pass your lips. Be humble, learn, listen more than you talk and you'll be fine.
Last edited by Deez340; 08-01-2007 at 10:46 PM.
#54
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
i am not just talking about myself. its like when ever a topic comes up with a low timer getting a job...there is always somebody older saying something negative. Regionals are hiring low timers, not majors. I talked to a NWA CA who retired in 04. He was hired with less then 400hrs. No one is trying to act arrogant. All i did was ask a simple question from switching from a "okay" regional to a more respectable where their are higher chance of getting on with a major. The thread started off fine, but towards the end it turned into CFI(with experience) vs a low timer.
#55
No one is saying don't take the job. But most of us 'old timers' would have apps out while working on our CFI or trying to find another time building job because it's the practical thing to do. Why are you worrying about how to get to your next regional before you've been to your first? Not everyone will get to FDX, UPS, or SWA. Just like not everyone will get to SKW, XJT, or RAH (pick your flavor of the month). Seriously man, you have 400 hours...it's good to think ahead but the next challenge, getting the first airline job, is a much higher threat to be focused on right now.
#56
No one is saying don't take the job. But most of us 'old timers' would have apps out while working on our CFI or trying to find another time building job because it's the practical thing to do. Why are you worrying about how to get to your next regional before you've been to your first? Not everyone will get to FDX, UPS, or SWA. Just like not everyone will get to SKW, XJT, or RAH (pick your flavor of the month). Seriously man, you have 400 hours...it's good to think ahead but the next challenge, getting the first airline job, is a much higher threat to be focused on right now.
.....
#57
OKAY...if airlines are HIRING guys with 250-450tt, WHY not apply and take the job. If they are willing to take the reponsibility of teaching a low time guy, that is their prob.
TO all the ppl who think low time pilots in a jet is bad...WHAT would you guys do in the same situation? I am 99.9% sure you guys would take the job instead of being a CFI
TO all the ppl who think low time pilots in a jet is bad...WHAT would you guys do in the same situation? I am 99.9% sure you guys would take the job instead of being a CFI

And i'm sure if i were them and had to get 1500hrs before i could get hired on with a regional then yeah i'd probably feel a little resentment as well...
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
From: RC-3 Seabee. Skipper of the A21 cutter.

ThreeGreen - You're right, everytime this topic comes up it turns sour. Why so much negativity towards a low time pilot getting hired at a regional? Have you guys that feel negativly towards low timers flying RJs had a bad experience with them at one point? If so, please share your story so the rest of us can get a better understanding of why you feel this way.
But this forum constitutes a fraction of the pilots in the industry and as I've seen, it's consistently a few that express distaste towards this subject. I have yet to meet a regional, major or cargo pilot face to face that doesn't say "Go for it!" After all, one of the major reasons for even going to a regional is to simply build up time and gain experience. I've never said that CFIing isn't a better route, it is; but I can't understand judging ones' ability to fly over the internet, regardless of time, because I just simply haven't flown with them. But I certainly won't be doubting anyone's ability either. This should be a place for encouragement in addition to everything else it is.
Last edited by blastboy; 08-02-2007 at 10:02 AM.
#59
It's just because their mad that they didn't get the same opportunity as we have. So they had to bust their ass doing the whole CFI thing for a couple years before they could go to a regional. And they want us to do the same... 
And i'm sure if i were them and had to get 1500hrs before i could get hired on with a regional then yeah i'd probably feel a little resentment as well...

And i'm sure if i were them and had to get 1500hrs before i could get hired on with a regional then yeah i'd probably feel a little resentment as well...
Being a CFI was the most valuable aviation experience I've had. I learned more as a CFI about human psychology, situational awareness, working ATC, command decision making, severe weather, and dealing with the unexpected than I did during all of my flight training. Anyone can run a checklist and learn callouts and profiles. It's the stuff you can't learn in a book that has everyone else concerned about low time pilots.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



