Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
No more published mins for Pinnacle >

No more published mins for Pinnacle

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

No more published mins for Pinnacle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2007 | 09:53 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by OOTSK
How many Delta connections are there? You have to hand it to management......they have done an incredible job of strike proofing the hubs.

Forget about any delta connection carrier trying to improve working conditions or increase pay rates! They will just move flying around between all of the carriers.

Where was the leadership when we all needed it?
my thoughts exactly. like people on here have said before, delta is trying to comair proof their flying. and yes, they will move flying around (already happening). lucky for us we didn't do anything to get this flying, so we have a lot to fight for, and the company has a lot to lose.
Reply
Old 09-02-2007 | 12:51 PM
  #32  
dondk's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: in a seat
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport
pinnacle will be flying 900's for delta out of atl, scl, and lax. they didn't sign a 10 year agreement with us to just fly 17 planes out of atlanta. there are more planes coming and they will be divided among the three bases.
not exactly true...

the initial aircraft are a "test" and based on performance and ONLY performance if Pinnacle meets the requirements then it is possible for an additional 16 -900. SLC and LAX were discussed, but due to high COL in LAX, it was suggested a wait and see approach. Also Mesa and recently Express Jet have been dabbling in LAX. Mesa not so lucky and I don't know about Expressjet.

Historically, Express 1 (former Pinnacle) signed a 10 year agreement for only 54 RJ's, that became 75, then 97, then 129, then 114, then 129 on the backs of NWA and XJ pilots. don't forget, NWA is slightly different animal then DCI. DCI has several carriers that don't fly very many aircraft for them because they can split up amongst all the DCI carriers.
Reply
Old 09-02-2007 | 03:15 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by dondk
not exactly true...

the initial aircraft are a "test" and based on performance and ONLY performance if Pinnacle meets the requirements then it is possible for an additional 16 -900. SLC and LAX were discussed, but due to high COL in LAX, it was suggested a wait and see approach. Also Mesa and recently Express Jet have been dabbling in LAX. Mesa not so lucky and I don't know about Expressjet.

Historically, Express 1 (former Pinnacle) signed a 10 year agreement for only 54 RJ's, that became 75, then 97, then 129, then 114, then 129 on the backs of NWA and XJ pilots. don't forget, NWA is slightly different animal then DCI. DCI has several carriers that don't fly very many aircraft for them because they can split up amongst all the DCI carriers.
so uh,,, what part of my statement was not true??? you didn't say anything that is contrary to what i said.
Reply
Old 09-05-2007 | 11:58 AM
  #34  
dondk's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: in a seat
Default

the only thing "guaranteed" is 16 aircraft, that is it.. no more, no less...

IF Pinnacle can meet and exceed the predetermined performance initiatives, then DCI may grant an additional allotment of aircraft with NO pre-determined locations.

The aircraft that are unofficially up for consideration are 16 that Mesa are currently operating and that is also provided that MESA does not turn around that operation. My guess is expressjet was put into LAX as an incentive for MESA to step up and if Expressjet succeeds I would guess they would get first shot over Pinnacle who is 6 months behind ExpressJet in operating for DCI.

All I am saying politely is you are counting chickens before they hatch and as with everything in aviation, don't count on it until it has been on the property for at least 6 months, that is all...
Reply
Old 09-05-2007 | 02:46 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by dondk
the only thing "guaranteed" is 16 aircraft, that is it.. no more, no less...

IF Pinnacle can meet and exceed the predetermined performance initiatives, then DCI may grant an additional allotment of aircraft with NO pre-determined locations.

The aircraft that are unofficially up for consideration are 16 that Mesa are currently operating and that is also provided that MESA does not turn around that operation. My guess is expressjet was put into LAX as an incentive for MESA to step up and if Expressjet succeeds I would guess they would get first shot over Pinnacle who is 6 months behind ExpressJet in operating for DCI.

All I am saying politely is you are counting chickens before they hatch and as with everything in aviation, don't count on it until it has been on the property for at least 6 months, that is all...
fair enough... but you even say the 16 900's are "guaranteed" but they aren't here yet.. we have filed with the DOT to fly out of lax, slc, and other west coast cities with aircraft greater than 65 seats. i am not counting my chickens before they hatch. i will probaly be long gone and at a major by the time all of this pans out. i dont care if pinnacle gets the jets or not. we as a pilot group did nothing for them, and we are so understaffed we wont miss them either.
Reply
Old 09-05-2007 | 03:52 PM
  #36  
dondk's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: in a seat
Default

I agree with you on all counts...

Uncle Phil got a good deal with the Q400's and CRJ's. They have firm orders on those, but your are right it really is not guaranteed.

The city pairs I saw for the -900 were interesting, up and down the coast and mexico and canada. My only response to it is it may be wishful thinking. We don't have the staffing and will not have the staffing by the time all 16 are on the property.

If it all happens, I hope there is a contract or it really will not be worth it.

The real interesting part I think will be when the rates are decided in Mid December. It will either be an exodus or standing room only for the equipment. I am hoping for exodus, otherwise I can see the boys on nonconnah maneuvering to split the pilot group further with Delta flying.
Reply
Old 09-05-2007 | 06:36 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by dondk
I agree with you on all counts...

Uncle Phil got a good deal with the Q400's and CRJ's. They have firm orders on those, but your are right it really is not guaranteed.

The city pairs I saw for the -900 were interesting, up and down the coast and mexico and canada. My only response to it is it may be wishful thinking. We don't have the staffing and will not have the staffing by the time all 16 are on the property.

If it all happens, I hope there is a contract or it really will not be worth it.

The real interesting part I think will be when the rates are decided in Mid December. It will either be an exodus or standing room only for the equipment. I am hoping for exodus, otherwise I can see the boys on nonconnah maneuvering to split the pilot group further with Delta flying.
i too am hoping for the exodus... one good thing is that what ever pay rate we get, we are going to change it in negotiations... so if it is a good rate, we will go a little hire during negotiations. uncle phil had a chance to put this all down over 2 years ago.. now he has got this pilot group so riled up that we wont take a crappy offer.
Reply
Old 09-05-2007 | 08:18 PM
  #38  
dondk's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: in a seat
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport
i too am hoping for the exodus... one good thing is that what ever pay rate we get, we are going to change it in negotiations... so if it is a good rate, we will go a little hire during negotiations. uncle phil had a chance to put this all down over 2 years ago.. now he has got this pilot group so riled up that we wont take a crappy offer.
The arbitrator will decide the pay rate for the -900, if the contract should settle shortly thereafter we will have little to no position to get a better -900 rate. if the contract drags like most of us expect, we will stand a better chance of higher rate for the -900. The risk is.. if the arbitrator "caps" the 900 rate lower than what we will argue for, it can have an affect the -200 rate.

Uncle Phil I feel is waiting a little longer, right now a good part of the pilot group cannot vote. Those who can, may be enticed by growth and upgrades and lose sight of the prize. The senior pilots are dropping like flies, so it can be attractive to a really junior pilot to sign, especially since it appears everyone will be hiring in the next few years. Some have predicted that the decision on the contract will come to the junior guys who came from programs who "need" Pinnacle to achieve their career goals.
Reply
Old 09-05-2007 | 08:57 PM
  #39  
sigep_nm's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Silver02ex


Yeah because you guys don't do it pushing off the "C" gates, or trying to come in the back way with those 900's
Ummmm, yeah because we dont have 9's in DTW, and yes you clowns always block the alley. Why dont you check you next ASAP report listing, should see a flagship that pushed back at MSP on the alley with a clearance from metering (by the way metering doesnt control the interior, thats ramp) and almost smashed into your company. I will omit the rest of things that you guys did yesterday, but does runway incursion ring a bell??????? And by the way there is no back way into the C gates.
Reply
Old 09-06-2007 | 06:50 AM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by sigep_nm
Ummmm, yeah because we dont have 9's in DTW, and yes you clowns always block the alley. Why dont you check you next ASAP report listing, should see a flagship that pushed back at MSP on the alley with a clearance from metering (by the way metering doesnt control the interior, thats ramp) and almost smashed into your company. I will omit the rest of things that you guys did yesterday, but does runway incursion ring a bell??????? And by the way there is no back way into the C gates.
I'm talking about MSP not DTW. I wonder why it takes sooooo long to park in MSP or DTW... Maybe if XJ would hire more rampers or make the one you have work harder we wouldn't have this problem of getting park in MSP or DTW and blocking the alley, trust me, we don't sit there and block it just for fun, it's to get park. Everytime I go to MEM I never have this problem. The only time those rampers were good was the 2 weeks that we had to fill out some aduit forms. After that was over, it was the same crap. No back way into the C gates? is that why i have to call ramp before reaching 79 to see if they want to bring us in on 79 or 95 to get to C25-C27? Can't miss it in the 10-7pages.

Last edited by Silver02ex; 09-06-2007 at 06:57 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
buffalopilot
Regional
20
11-12-2007 08:13 AM
mia1900fo
Major
5
07-13-2007 10:17 AM
AV8ER
Regional
28
06-29-2007 08:07 PM
ubermich
Regional
26
02-21-2006 05:39 AM
FL410
Regional
3
10-09-2005 08:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices