ERJ vs CRJ
#33
#34
scary...
however the flight director in speed mode in the ERJ isn't much better. While it doesn't go from 15 degrees to 2.5, it porpoises enough to make the guys riding out on the tip of the diving board annoyed.
The honeywell also has issues with turning in the wrong direction initially when changes are made to the FMS (heard a theory on why once...made "sense") which is also annoying. Getting in an out is nice, having the low ceiling/ raised floorboards is annoying for height though.
And i believe the 145 has two climb profiles in the AFM...one is the 270/.56 that we use, and the other is a 290/.65 which actually makes for a much smoother climb...IMHO.
however the flight director in speed mode in the ERJ isn't much better. While it doesn't go from 15 degrees to 2.5, it porpoises enough to make the guys riding out on the tip of the diving board annoyed.
The honeywell also has issues with turning in the wrong direction initially when changes are made to the FMS (heard a theory on why once...made "sense") which is also annoying. Getting in an out is nice, having the low ceiling/ raised floorboards is annoying for height though.
And i believe the 145 has two climb profiles in the AFM...one is the 270/.56 that we use, and the other is a 290/.65 which actually makes for a much smoother climb...IMHO.
#36
#37
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
#39
For the ERJ with Honeywell just hold the TCS for a three count and it won't do it. Simple as that. I forgot the distance but it places the point out in front of the aircraft so it tries to drive to it before intercept. I'll give it to the Universals on that one but I still like the Honeywells more overall.
#40
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





