Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Retire at the regionals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2006, 10:03 AM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
FutureATP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 16
Default Retire at the regionals

Hey everyone,
First time posting, long time reader on this fabulour message board. I was wondering if anyone knows what percentage of regional pilots stay with a regional carrier and retire with them, if they have ever been any pilots to do that?
FutureATP is offline  
Old 02-20-2006, 04:23 PM
  #2  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
FutureATP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 16
Default

Guess this is a mystery
FutureATP is offline  
Old 02-20-2006, 04:59 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: GA7
Posts: 128
Default

I'm, um, not really sure if there's been a statistic on that sort of thing.. but I will bet you that whatever it is will steadily rise over the next few years. The legacy carriers are struggling and as a result more pilots will make the regionals a career; not most, just more.
Chris is offline  
Old 02-20-2006, 05:13 PM
  #4  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

ACA/Independence had several retirements before they closed the doors. There were a handful of captains that had come over from either AWAC and WestAir.

There will definately be more regional airline retirements in the upcoming years. Part of the reason why you haven't seen a whole bunch is because up until the industry slowed down, most regional pilots were still able to move on to the majors. Also the concept of a "feeder" airline really didn't come into very strong existance until the late 80's/early 90's so the employee groups at the regionals are no where as senior as at the major airlines.
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 02-20-2006, 05:33 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 118
Default

Originally Posted by FutureATP
I was wondering if anyone knows what percentage of regional pilots stay with a regional carrier and retire with them, if they have ever been any pilots to do that?
I think a more pertinent question would be "what percentage of regional airlines will stay in business long enough for you to reach retirement age?"

I used to fly for a regional that's now defunct. I remember a few guys saying "I'd consider staying here for the rest of my career if we get the 70 seaters." My response was "do you honestly believe this company will exist when you're 60 years old?"

Most regional airlines exist through a contractual relationship with a major airline. Lose that contract and you could find yourself in a world of hurt. Independence is the perfect example of what happens when you have a fleet of aircraft and no one paying the bills. Yes, I realize ACA chose to sever their relationship with UAL but even if they had resigned, the company would have shrunk considerably. And if UAL had not made it through their restructuring, ACA would more than likely have met the same fate.

EDPM

Last edited by EDPM; 02-20-2006 at 06:04 PM.
EDPM is offline  
Old 02-20-2006, 05:46 PM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by EDPM
I think a more pertinent question would be "what percentage of regional airlines will stay in business long enough for you to reach retirement age?"

I used to fly for regional that's now defunct. I remember a few guys saying "I'd consider staying here for the rest of my career if we get the 70 seaters." My response was "do you honestly believe this company will exist when you're 60 years old?"

Most regional airlines exist through a contractual relationship with a major airline. Lose that contract and you could find yourself in a world of hurt. Independence is the perfect example of what happens when you have a fleet of aircraft and no one paying the bills. Yes, I realize ACA chose to sever their relationship with UAL but even if they had resigned, the company would have shrunk considerably. And if UAL had not made it through their restructuring, ACA would more than likely have met the same fate.

EDPM
Yeah, what he said. You are MUCH better off at a company that sells tickets; that way you won't be shut down overnight by contract changes. You could still go wrong, but at least you'll see it coming years in advance.

And remember, it's like the stock market...past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Skywest might be an exception; they used to sell tickets and have stated they would go back to that if DAL shut down. Horizon is wholly owned and is probably pretty safe too. Maybe there's others on the east coast.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-20-2006, 06:26 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 345
Default

So Eagle would look like a steady one that you wouldnt have to worry about being shut down. It looks like they will end up having alot of pilots retire there. There are so many of them that have been there for such a long time.
Linebacker35 is offline  
Old 02-20-2006, 06:42 PM
  #8  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by Linebacker35
So Eagle would look like a steady one that you wouldnt have to worry about being shut down. It looks like they will end up having alot of pilots retire there. There are so many of them that have been there for such a long time.
True, good benies and you might even upgrade to AA mainline someday. But the lengthy stint as an eagle FO would make almost any other regional a better economic bet. Also Expressjet USED to be wholly owned by CAL, now they've been sold off and are getting whipsawed by their former parent...eagle could go the same way.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-21-2006, 06:04 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 135
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
.....and you might even upgrade to AA mainline someday.
rickair7777,

You make some good posts on this board, and I agree with most things that you say. However, I believe I've seen you mention "upgrading to AA" more than once, and I don't like to see that type of misinformation going around, especially when they fall on naive ears of airline pilot newbies and wanabies.

The flow-through (which I'm assuming you are referencing) is DEAD. I believe the agreement ends next year, and while I have been an ex-Eagle pilot for only about 5 months now, I doubt the general consensus regarding the flow agreement has changed within both groups at AMR (i.e. Eagle and AA). No one really wants to keep it. AA guys (and TWA guys for that matter) don't want Eagle pilots on their property anymore than Eagle pilots wanted AA flow backs on theirs. The agreement NEVER worked as it was supposed to, and last I heard everyone wanted it to die.

So for anyone that is looking to go to Eagle; first I'd say just don't go. IMHO the place is a career killer, unless you WANT to stay at that regional the rest of your life and have no ambition for bigger and better things. Second, DO NOT listen to anyone that touts the "flow agreement" between AA and Eagle. It didn't work, doesn't work, and will never work for the Eagle pilot group. I'm not absolute with the figures, but I believe only a little over 100 pilots actually flowed up to AA when there should have been something like 600+ to flow. Both AA and Eagle management screwed the pilot group. Some of whom stayed at Eagle, passing up other opportunities, because they thought they would actually flow up to AA. Now that will never happen for them. Also, the agreement bit Eagle FOs in the a** because the AA pilots (and TWA pilots contrary to the contract) flowed down into Eagle. The number was something like 400 or 500 last I heard. That's a huge difference when you look at how many pilots flowed up to AA. This put a severe hardship on the Eagle FOs (and one of the main reasons I left) because they will not see an upgrade for 5, 10, or more years (IMHO) because a "flow back" occupies their seat on the left side of the aircraft.

Anyway, rickair I appreciate your input, but please refrain from dispersing false or distorted info regarding the AA-Eagle flow agreement.
directbears is offline  
Old 02-21-2006, 08:31 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 345
Default

Originally Posted by directbears
rickair7777,

You make some good posts on this board, and I agree with most things that you say. However, I believe I've seen you mention "upgrading to AA" more than once, and I don't like to see that type of misinformation going around, especially when they fall on naive ears of airline pilot newbies and wanabies.

The flow-through (which I'm assuming you are referencing) is DEAD. I believe the agreement ends next year, and while I have been an ex-Eagle pilot for only about 5 months now, I doubt the general consensus regarding the flow agreement has changed within both groups at AMR (i.e. Eagle and AA). No one really wants to keep it. AA guys (and TWA guys for that matter) don't want Eagle pilots on their property anymore than Eagle pilots wanted AA flow backs on theirs. The agreement NEVER worked as it was supposed to, and last I heard everyone wanted it to die.

So for anyone that is looking to go to Eagle; first I'd say just don't go. IMHO the place is a career killer, unless you WANT to stay at that regional the rest of your life and have no ambition for bigger and better things. Second, DO NOT listen to anyone that touts the "flow agreement" between AA and Eagle. It didn't work, doesn't work, and will never work for the Eagle pilot group. I'm not absolute with the figures, but I believe only a little over 100 pilots actually flowed up to AA when there should have been something like 600+ to flow. Both AA and Eagle management screwed the pilot group. Some of whom stayed at Eagle, passing up other opportunities, because they thought they would actually flow up to AA. Now that will never happen for them. Also, the agreement bit Eagle FOs in the a** because the AA pilots (and TWA pilots contrary to the contract) flowed down into Eagle. The number was something like 400 or 500 last I heard. That's a huge difference when you look at how many pilots flowed up to AA. This put a severe hardship on the Eagle FOs (and one of the main reasons I left) because they will not see an upgrade for 5, 10, or more years (IMHO) because a "flow back" occupies their seat on the left side of the aircraft.

Anyway, rickair I appreciate your input, but please refrain from dispersing false or distorted info regarding the AA-Eagle flow agreement.

Well if its 400 or 500 AA pilots that flowed down, wouldnt that mean when AA starts hiring again Eagle will need to replace 400 to 500 captains over a certain period of time. I would think upgrade time would drop alot once AA starts hiring back all their pilots there.
Linebacker35 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozen Ronin
Regional
2
07-04-2006 06:17 PM
miker1
Regional
21
02-13-2006 03:54 PM
supercell86
Hiring News
14
01-09-2006 01:07 PM
Pilot's Wife
Regional
15
08-21-2005 08:49 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Regional
3
08-21-2005 01:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices