XJT finally gets some good news
#51
I KNOW, I was pointing out the ignorance displayed by TD's post. If CAL truly had control over the airplanes, they would have comeback later when they realized what a mistake they made.
They haven't, therefore CAL doesn't have complete control, nor able to take planes at their will.
They haven't, therefore CAL doesn't have complete control, nor able to take planes at their will.
CAL currently has 205 planes in CAL colors they're leasing to XJT.
Then they have an additional 69 planes they are leasing to XJT in DAL and XJT colors.
XJT doesn't own any of the airplanes and really doesn't have much say so in what happens with them. If CAL wants those planes back to give to someone else guess what happens? XJT can't afford to keep them.
CAL wouldn't pull all those planes tomorrow. No one ever does. You'd see a shift, though very quickly. A simple no renewal of contracts is enough to do the job. 51 planes here, 69 planes there.
Nevets as far as what you're pointing at you looked at a statement, turned it completely backwards and then managed to look at it from your point of view which isn't the point of view it was written in. You're speaking from a pilots standpoint in your post while I'm speaking from an economical standpoint. I was correct in what was said. You kept saying to prove it so I was saying if the past year isn't proof then I dont' know what is. I also showed actual letters backing my points. You denounced what I said with nothing more than "You don't have proof" meanwhile it was staring at you and the fact it's all around you.
Last edited by ToiletDuck; 06-05-2008 at 10:55 AM.
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
I don't believe I said anything about CAL having complete control over the planes. You said XJT has 205 planes in CAL colors. Which one of us is displaying ignorance on this? Last I checked CAL leases those to XJT. CHQ has planes in CAL colors. SKYW has planes in UAL/DAL etc. colors. XJT doesn't have any planes. The fact that XJT doesn't own them is part of their collateral crunch.
An obvious statement showing what I've also said elsewhere. We all know XJT gets first dibs but since they can't afford the batch they have on branded now they surely couldn't afford a whole lot of new ones. XJT would still need to find homes for all those branded planes before they even though about taking more from CAL. So basically if CAL went to XJT tomorrow and said we aren't renewing contracts on X amount of frames XJT wouldn't have any position but to let them go. I know there's this little thought jumping around that XJT could then blow up the market using those frames for other airlines but there's other competitors out there. That's one big gamble that the management already tried once. We see where they are now. They don't have the flexibility they did in the past to try it again.
An obvious statement showing what I've also said elsewhere. We all know XJT gets first dibs but since they can't afford the batch they have on branded now they surely couldn't afford a whole lot of new ones. XJT would still need to find homes for all those branded planes before they even though about taking more from CAL. So basically if CAL went to XJT tomorrow and said we aren't renewing contracts on X amount of frames XJT wouldn't have any position but to let them go. I know there's this little thought jumping around that XJT could then blow up the market using those frames for other airlines but there's other competitors out there. That's one big gamble that the management already tried once. We see where they are now. They don't have the flexibility they did in the past to try it again.
Pretty funny for you to be picking on NEVETS for turning something around.
IT'S OK, you mis spoke, you can admit it.
#53
. I wasn't picking on Nevets at all. For what it's worth I admire your ability to ONLY see the best in these situations.
#54
Good point. But do you ever read the cargo forums? Were you keeping up when the NWA/DAL thing started? It's not just "regional guys" that engage in this type banter.
When FDX was going through their FDA negotiation, they even dedicated an entire section for them. It got even WORSE when age 65 was going. It ALSO required the most moderating at the time. At least, according to a moderator.
The FACT is at the regional level, there are MORE issues. Regionals are played off against one another, doesn't happen on the same magnitude as with you mighty "legacy" pilots. If CAL was about to be bought out, and YOUR job may be in question, do you think you would be so passive and happy go lucky? Doubt it.
When FDX was going through their FDA negotiation, they even dedicated an entire section for them. It got even WORSE when age 65 was going. It ALSO required the most moderating at the time. At least, according to a moderator.
The FACT is at the regional level, there are MORE issues. Regionals are played off against one another, doesn't happen on the same magnitude as with you mighty "legacy" pilots. If CAL was about to be bought out, and YOUR job may be in question, do you think you would be so passive and happy go lucky? Doubt it.
I was merely sitting here thinking about what a nice day it is here today in our nation's capitol and despite the fact that I'll most likely be furloughed in the fall, have accepted that it is a byproduct (unfortunately) of doing what I love. Everyone (is that all encompassing enough for you?) needs to rally together to protect the industry as a whole. Too often things are made to seem personal on here, when as I pointed out - they are not. Business is business.
Funny how at all the Air, Inc. seminars I've been to not a single pilot was ever scorned or ridiculed by their peers in person, but the keyboard makes it so simple and acceptable.
The day we all stop working to improve this situation together, we have lost.
#55
Everyone (is that all encompassing enough for you?) needs to rally together to protect the industry as a whole. Too often things are made to seem personal on here, when as I pointed out - they are not. Business is business.
Funny how at all the Air, Inc. seminars I've been to not a single pilot was ever scorned or ridiculed by their peers in person, but the keyboard makes it so simple and acceptable.
Funny how at all the Air, Inc. seminars I've been to not a single pilot was ever scorned or ridiculed by their peers in person, but the keyboard makes it so simple and acceptable.
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,847
Likes: 10
Careful TD you might ::gasp:: insult someone
LoL
LoL
#58
Banned
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
I didn't misspoke. You are reading what you want to read out of it. Don't tell me what I basically said. Take what I did say and leave it at that. 1)XJT doesn't own the planes. 2)If CAL cancels contracts and wants them back CAL will get them back. Why? Because XJT can't afford to take them. What are they doing to do increase branded? Oh wait no. They're going to take them, pay CAL a premium, then add them+branded to the legacies that are already stating they want a cut in 50 seat flying. So yea if CAL wants them CAL will get them. Why don't you explain to me more how CAL can't do without you? I haven't heard anyone from any other regional on here saying such naive things. Even the wholly owned guys don't say that
. I wasn't picking on Nevets at all.
For what it's worth I admire your ability to ONLY see the best in these situations.
. I wasn't picking on Nevets at all. For what it's worth I admire your ability to ONLY see the best in these situations.
You really are upset XJT didn't hire you, aren't you?
Last edited by tpersuit; 06-05-2008 at 01:43 PM.
#59
TD quit lying. CAL has no control over any of the 274 aircraft unless we give them back to them. We lease them from the Banks and Financial Institutions that OWN THEM, NOT CAL! We pay more the lease now, since CAL DOENS'T PAY A PART OF IT ANYMORE!
You really are upset XJT didn't hire you, aren't you?
You really are upset XJT didn't hire you, aren't you?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



