Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PDT News and Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2014 | 09:10 AM
  #4701  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 FO
Default

Originally Posted by DashAlmighty
You guys need to lighten up lol. I've been here going on 7 years, and yes it is tough. Unfair? No. I even decided to join the training department last year (guess who I am). While I won't comment on any of the issues above we have a fantastic pilot group, and great instructors. In the past 3 months our Union Reps have commented several times to me in and outside of class how great things have become in the training department (Call your reps). It is a reality in our industry that some people will not make it through training. It is a reality that some people will not do well in recurrent. Nobody gets singled out personally by anyone, that's what standards are for. As for other realities. We have a dwindling, aging fleet of dash-8s that nobody wants to fly right now. That makes it hard to attract enough candidates to counteract the "Normal" wash-out rate. This forum like most review sites are full of the 10 people that feel they were wronged somehow. They take full advantage of anonymity to wrongfully accuse those who fought daily to get these guys through. So please, if you have any issues we have a open-door policy. Call us. Come down and take a sim ride. Sit through some of our classes. But please do not use this site to make yourself feel better at somebody else's expense. Its not fair to those who are actively working hard to get through this program, or the 100s of guys that get the job done everyday out on the line. They deserve the respect.

Enough of that! See the rest of you at recurrent!

Respectfully,
BS<--- Those are initials lol
Hey, what a strange coincidence, the instructor I mentioned earlier that said "Our job isn't to teach" has the same initials.
Reply
Old 04-11-2014 | 10:11 AM
  #4702  
meah's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: rj left
Default

Had to chime in here.

I was at PDT years ago and saw first hand the carnage that that training department hands out. I saw 2 guys in my class get canned during sim. I have seen people throw up in briefing rooms in the training center because of the fear of loosing their career. I made it by without any dings thank god. It was my first 121 job and scares me that that place could of ruined my entire career before it even started. Didn't a whole class walk out a year or two ago after getting screamed at for something they had nothing to do with? Stay away guys. I'm just a survivor...
Reply
Old 04-13-2014 | 05:21 AM
  #4703  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingBoiler
Hey, what a strange coincidence, the instructor I mentioned earlier that said "Our job isn't to teach" has the same initials.
BS is right.

If you value your career and the $100K+ you spent getting to where you are, stay away from Piedmont.

Don't believe for a second any idealistic BS about training being hard, not all survive, the good of the profession, open door policy, etc. The fact of the matter is that the JK testing department has been bullying and abusing people for years. That is the reality.

Ask a union rep? Ha!

Stay far, far away from Piedmont. There are plenty of other commuter airlines out there begging for you to work for them.
Reply
Old 04-17-2014 | 06:44 PM
  #4704  
What's Avatar
Underpaid...
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
Default

Can the PDT pilots elaborate on this?

"Although his name appeared on the document, the signature of Piedmont Airlines MEC chairman Bruce Freedman was not on it, the document stated that his signature was “pending” and I’m told he declined to sign."

Pilot unions band together to fight contract concessions at regional airlines | Dallas Morning News
Reply
Old 04-17-2014 | 06:51 PM
  #4705  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Default

I guess we know who wants that Eagle flying
Reply
Old 04-17-2014 | 07:05 PM
  #4706  
piper338's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Default PDT News and Rumors

I saw that document the simple fact that PSA signed it should make it null and void
Reply
Old 04-17-2014 | 07:30 PM
  #4707  
dash8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: rabble rouser
Default

Originally Posted by piper338
I saw that document the simple fact that PSA signed it should make it null and void

my sentiments exactly, thats like hirihito signing as a collaborator on teh geneva convention
Reply
Old 04-18-2014 | 05:43 AM
  #4708  
MrObvious's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default

I don't understand why everyone is making a big deal about pdt not signing it, everyone should be making a huge deal out of psa signing it, slap in the face to everyone.
Reply
Old 04-18-2014 | 05:59 AM
  #4709  
What's Avatar
Underpaid...
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
Default

Originally Posted by MrObvious
I don't understand why everyone is making a big deal about pdt not signing it, everyone should be making a huge deal out of psa signing it, slap in the face to everyone.
I am not making a big deal out of it, but since you insist.

PSA took concessions under the premise that they would get growth flying at the expense of Eagle as the airplanes they were awarded "were" supposed to have gone to Eagle if we would have accepted the B scale.

Eagle has said no twice , after the first time management went to PSA, they came back to Eagle and we said no again. One of the threats used against the Eagle pilots was that PDT could see airplanes, and management is on the record stating that they would like to refleet the wholly owned regionals. I understand that PSA signing this letter has mixed feelings, but my concern is not so much PDT not signing it, but rather the timing. So close to Eagle and others saying NO, while AAG seeks someone to fly their large RJs that are to replace routes currently flown by Eagle.

My concern is that as pilots, regional pilots but specifically AAG regional pilots... we are negotiating against our selves and management is trying to divide and ensure that there is no unity between the three pilot groups. When PSA negotiated their last deal they separated from the rest of the industry as they did their deal, I am wondering if the same thing is happening at PDT. This is the intent of management, and we are hurting each others careers and negotiating against our collective futures.
Reply
Old 04-18-2014 | 06:35 AM
  #4710  
higgi8f6's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8
Default

From what I hear, and I have no facts to back it up, was this letter was drafted when PDT had no representative present at the meeting. Therefore with no one to represent us this signature was pending. I haven't heard a yay or nay from Piedmont. However, like many here, I question it's integrity with a signature from PSA. If you want entertainment, please go to CLT and sit in the crew room. I get a headache every time I spend more than 15 minutes there.

In regards to refleeting Piedmont with 170s. Kenji Hashimoto was in SBY for a town hall meeting with Piedmont employees a week after the Eagle vote and the question was brought up. He stated that there is no way for Piedmont to be ready in time to take the first batch of 170s when they arrive. Now that's not to say we are out of the running for some later but I keep getting the sense that as long as our current management is in charge, nothing will change. Ask any Piedmont pilot about the iPad debacle or scheduling changes...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviator01
Horizon Air
47
06-24-2008 11:56 AM
triflyier
Cargo
28
05-02-2008 05:26 AM
tankerpuke
Cargo
2
09-23-2007 08:37 AM
Freighter Captain
Hiring News
3
05-16-2005 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices