Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PDT News and Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2015, 10:41 AM
  #7001  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: DHC-8 100/300
Posts: 843
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
Yes, agreed. A valuable resource. So, when that fleet goes away through fuel costs or large RJ staffing needs... will they merge, or recycle with preferential hiring? Which would you do?

We all know there won't be enough pilots. So, which plane gets parked first? The E145 or the E175?

You're correct, do what's right for you.
They continued to operate wholly owned 50 seat jets during the last downturn and rise in oil. There is no reason to suspect they wouldn't do the same thing in the event prices rise again ESPECIALLY with all the flying coming back in house and to mainline. Good things btw

Also, 50 seaters aren't the future here at PDT. Temporary solution as we transition into a different airline.
PDTpilotXX is offline  
Old 10-09-2015, 11:32 AM
  #7002  
Gets Weekends Off
 
higgi8f6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DHC-8
Posts: 150
Default

One more thing for those considering Piedmont that are coming in with ATP minimums that I don't think anyone has mentioned. Piedmont requires a minimum of 2500 hrs to be a captain (I believe it's an insurance minimum) which is part of the reason upgrade is soo low. Many FO's hired in 2012-13 timeframe where hired right after an ATP was required for both seats and many were hired with a restricted ATP at around 1000-1200 hrs. At Piedmont I was flying about 600-700 hrs a year so these guys are having to bypass upgrades because they do not meet the insurance minimums to be captain. If you decide to go to Piedmont in hopes of a quick upgrade just make sure you have the time. I enjoyed all the people I worked.
higgi8f6 is offline  
Old 10-09-2015, 11:49 AM
  #7003  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: DHC-8 100/300
Posts: 843
Default

Originally Posted by higgi8f6 View Post
One more thing for those considering Piedmont that are coming in with ATP minimums that I don't think anyone has mentioned. Piedmont requires a minimum of 2500 hrs to be a captain (I believe it's an insurance minimum) which is part of the reason upgrade is soo low. Many FO's hired in 2012-13 timeframe where hired right after an ATP was required for both seats and many were hired with a restricted ATP at around 1000-1200 hrs. At Piedmont I was flying about 600-700 hrs a year so these guys are having to bypass upgrades because they do not meet the insurance minimums to be captain. If you decide to go to Piedmont in hopes of a quick upgrade just make sure you have the time. I enjoyed all the people I worked.
I asked about this, just company policy. It can be lowered to 2000.
PDTpilotXX is offline  
Old 10-09-2015, 12:12 PM
  #7004  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 336
Default

Originally Posted by PDTpilotXX View Post
I asked about this, just company policy. It can be lowered to 2000.
I hope they dont, 2500 for a pic is low enough I think.
flyviper is offline  
Old 10-09-2015, 12:25 PM
  #7005  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: DHC-8 100/300
Posts: 843
Default

Originally Posted by flyviper View Post
I hope they dont, 2500 for a pic is low enough I think.
I absolutely agree
PDTpilotXX is offline  
Old 10-09-2015, 01:55 PM
  #7006  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AMC190's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 274
Default

Originally Posted by PDTpilotXX View Post
I absolutely agree
About how long would it take to reach the 1000 required hrs?? With the actual growth?
AMC190 is offline  
Old 10-09-2015, 02:38 PM
  #7007  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: DHC-8 100/300
Posts: 843
Default

Originally Posted by AMC190 View Post
About how long would it take to reach the 1000 required hrs?? With the actual growth?
Avg reserve time is a month and plan on blocking between 80-90/hrs a month
PDTpilotXX is offline  
Old 10-09-2015, 04:20 PM
  #7008  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 144
Default

Anyone else starting class on Nov.9th?
kls81 is offline  
Old 10-09-2015, 06:17 PM
  #7009  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by PDTpilotXX View Post
They continued to operate wholly owned 50 seat jets during the last downturn and rise in oil. There is no reason to suspect they wouldn't do the same thing in the event prices rise again ESPECIALLY with all the flying coming back in house and to mainline. Good things btw

Also, 50 seaters aren't the future here at PDT. Temporary solution as we transition into a different airline.
Yes, but they also parked all the Saabs, returned a significant portion of the ATRs and canceled the last 50 145s they had ordered during that time.

But I do think they have a plan for all their wholly owneds
jdflyer1999 is offline  
Old 10-10-2015, 06:29 AM
  #7010  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by jdflyer1999 View Post
Yes, but they also parked all the Saabs, returned a significant portion of the ATRs and canceled the last 50 145s they had ordered during that time.

But I do think they have a plan for all their wholly owneds
Of course there's a plan for all three and they are in the works. Even Piedmont was on it's last leg and AAG wasn't going to pump millions into it and make an Ex-Vice President of US Airways the new Leader unless they had a plan.

Now it's just a matter of grabbing the popcorn and watching it play out. Knowing Parker it will probably play out just as he planned.
billyho is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviator01
Horizon Air
47
06-24-2008 11:56 AM
triflyier
Cargo
28
05-02-2008 05:26 AM
tankerpuke
Cargo
2
09-23-2007 08:37 AM
Freighter Captain
Hiring News
3
05-16-2005 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices