Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
RAH signs agreement with Midwest Airlines >

RAH signs agreement with Midwest Airlines

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

RAH signs agreement with Midwest Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2008, 01:16 PM
  #101  
Line Holder
 
Turbinebound's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320FO
Posts: 56
Default

Is it still too late to change careers?
Turbinebound is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 01:58 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by Turbinebound View Post
Is it still too late to change careers?
Nope, it's never to early to start begging for spare change.
Flyboydan is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 05:53 PM
  #103  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by mking84 View Post
Honestly how could the RAH pilots not feel used? They have been. This is a great example of why pilots dont give up scope, in its various forms. T.he test for you guys is going to be what you do about this. Everybody on here from the RAH pilot group says " oh its bad, we wont do it, its not fair etc..." Lets see if its talk not walk.
The only power the RAH pilots have to make sure everything happens per the contract. Outside of that you're just asking to be fired.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 06:14 PM
  #104  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets View Post


Let me spell it out for you since you either are ignoring it or don't understand. The similarity is that one pilot group, RAH and SKW, is being used to whipsaw another pilot group, Midwest and XJT.



That's the whole POINT!!! Its a whipsaw regardless. Its just that your pilot group seems to be the beneficiary of it at the peril of the other. Is that why you want to deny the similarities? Keep in mind, I'm not blaming the RAH pilot group. It just is what it is.
Nevets with all due respect you're taking two different post that were centered around two different subjects and applying them at the same time which of course make them contradictory.

To the first one. I originally took the ramblings of that person and stated how "there is a lot of irony in his post". Meaning there were similarities. Since then the debate went one direction and now has made full circle where you're yelling at me how there are similarities. That was my original point.

Secondly, yes we completely understand what is trying to take place. However this news was first broken to both RAH and Midex at the same time which was through a public press release. RAH pilots have no real say in the matter except to make sure things are done per the contract. That is the only leverage we have. We are not happy with the situation in general.

Lastly XJT wasn't simply a whipsaw. There is this widespread talk that SKYW was used simply to whipsaw XJT. Not true. SKYW put money, investors money, on the table for XJT. It was a real offer for real cash. It wasn't an alter-ego creation like gojets. If XJT had been taken the deal, as they should have from a business point of view, things would be different. When they didn't CAL gave them the option to take the new deal or they'd go with SKYW. XJT decided to take it. It's no secret that XJT has butted heads with CAL many times. Most people don't bite the hand that feeds them. They did and CAL decided to pull that hand back and diversify itself a little more. It wasn't a plain and simple whipsaw. It was a series of reactions taken by both sides over a decent span of time. I know it's just my opinion so forgive me if I don't see it the same, but I have a hard time believing that one day Larry woke up and said "I want to start a plan, that will span a few years, to whipsaw XJT". CAL still pays the fuel bills like the rest of the guys and when things went through the floor they needed to do what they could to stay only marginally in the red. I don't think it was any hell bent vendetta to simply yank XJT around as much as quick decisions to deal with a buckling industry. CAL only lost 3mil last quarter versus the rest due to these drastic changes. I don't personally know what price they're asking XJT to operate at. It could be a reasonable price that XJT's having issues with simply because of the high operating cost the company has compared to others. I don't know. I don't consider it a whipsaw. There is no Freedom-A or Go-Jet created simply lower your contract. SKYW wasn't put there by CAL simply to get a lower price out of you guys. SKYW was there to do business with CAL and CAL expected to do business with SKYW because of their lower operating cost. XJT put it's foot down so CAL said, "If you don't like it then you operate at this price". One thing's for sure and that's that Larry is a bean counter and would go with whoever is cheapest to operate with. You see it as a whipsaw, that's understandable, but I see it as CAL doing business to save itself in the current market. I don't think there were any evil intentions running around for the past couple years just to stick it to you guys.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 06:16 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

I have read a good portion of this thread and would like to give my two cents.

I have been in the airline industry for close to two years now. I was vehemently anti-union when I first came here. Now, due to my experiences so far, and events such as what this thread is discussing, I am now a union supporter.

What Midwest and Republic management is doing is sickening. Midwest pilots will lose their job, only to be replaced by a regional pilot that will do the same job for less. If we allow this to continue happening, there will be no mainline jobs left. We will all be flying Boeings for a regional wage at the end of our careers.

Republic pilots need to stand up and do what's right. Republic pilots need to stand up to management and refuse to fly routes that put Midwest pilots out of a job. Any pilots that do agree to do the flying are scabs in my book, I am sure that most pilots would agree with me.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 06:59 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

Well I guess its a good thing that your book doesnt mean crap. Learn what a scab is then come back and apologize for calling fellow pilots scabs when its obvious you have no idea what a scab is.

RAH pilots are not in favor of this... but the alternative is to be fired... not furloughed... no leave of absence... fired.

You your self said it..... this is managements brew on both sides.... the pilots are just pawns.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 07:04 PM
  #107  
The NeverEnding Story
Thread Starter
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,514
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Any pilots that do agree to do the flying are scabs in my book, I am sure that most pilots would agree with me.
As much as this sucks for MEH pilots...no, most pilots wouldn't agree on your use of "scab".
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 07:11 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by HercDriver130 View Post
Well I guess its a good thing that your book doesnt mean crap. Learn what a scab is then come back and apologize for calling fellow pilots scabs when its obvious you have no idea what a scab is.

RAH pilots are not in favor of this... but the alternative is to be fired... not furloughed... no leave of absence... fired.

You your self said it..... this is managements brew on both sides.... the pilots are just pawns.
How is this any different than the Gojet/ TSA and Mesa/ Freedom debacle? Those pilots took over flying that belonged to other pilot groups and did it cheaper. They got labeled scabs. I don't see how this is any different. Midwest guys are getting screwed by management, and if any Republic pilots are willing to step in and do the flying Midwest pilots are doing for less, then they should be scabs too.

Finally, I never called Republic pilots scabs. I merely stated that they should be labeled that IF, and only IF, they take over Midwest flying.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 07:12 PM
  #109  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76 View Post
I have read a good portion of this thread and would like to give my two cents.

I have been in the airline industry for close to two years now. I was vehemently anti-union when I first came here. Now, due to my experiences so far, and events such as what this thread is discussing, I am now a union supporter.

What Midwest and Republic management is doing is sickening. Midwest pilots will lose their job, only to be replaced by a regional pilot that will do the same job for less. If we allow this to continue happening, there will be no mainline jobs left. We will all be flying Boeings for a regional wage at the end of our careers.

Republic pilots need to stand up and do what's right. Republic pilots need to stand up to management and refuse to fly routes that put Midwest pilots out of a job. Any pilots that do agree to do the flying are scabs in my book, I am sure that most pilots would agree with me.
I share your frustration on this new move by managements. No one wants to this industry to go the way of the "technical support" style where it's all outsourced. Unfortunately the only thing we can do is stick to the contract. Simply not working would have you dismissed from the company. I wouldn't call them scabs.

Gojet/TSA and mesa/Freedom are different because each of those alter-egos were created for the sole purpose of whipsawing their pilot groups. Once the companies were created the pilots then decided to work there fully knowing what was taking place. They didn't simply read about it in the news that they were going to be doing new flying for someone putting more of their pilots on the street.

However by definition the GoJet and Freedom guys aren't scabs as far as I know. I don't believe they flew any struck work or crossed any picket lines did they?

Last edited by ToiletDuck; 09-06-2008 at 07:19 PM.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 09-06-2008, 07:15 PM
  #110  
Line Holder
 
IFlyForFood's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 77
Default

This all coming from someone that's been in the industry what, 2 years? LMFAO. So, I guess the opinions/thoughts of those of us that have been in this industry since you were most likely in diapers doesn't matter, eh?

See what we've seen, live what we've lived, get more than 2 years under your belt, then we might just respect your opinion a little more, but will never respect you if you use that kind of language.


Originally Posted by texaspilot76 View Post
I have read a good portion of this thread and would like to give my two cents.

I have been in the airline industry for close to two years now. I was vehemently anti-union when I first came here. Now, due to my experiences so far, and events such as what this thread is discussing, I am now a union supporter.

What Midwest and Republic management is doing is sickening. Midwest pilots will lose their job, only to be replaced by a regional pilot that will do the same job for less. If we allow this to continue happening, there will be no mainline jobs left. We will all be flying Boeings for a regional wage at the end of our careers.

Republic pilots need to stand up and do what's right. Republic pilots need to stand up to management and refuse to fly routes that put Midwest pilots out of a job. Any pilots that do agree to do the flying are scabs in my book, I am sure that most pilots would agree with me.
IFlyForFood is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
vagabond
Major
37
09-09-2008 02:19 PM
DLax85
Cargo
3
08-30-2008 07:00 PM
Commando
Cargo
90
08-22-2008 07:57 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-26-2005 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices