Why do we accept these wages?
#61
Speaking of, this is so painful to watch. I love how everytime they say "Regional Jet Pilot" they show a 727 or Md-80.
Jet University :: Training Programs :: Express Airline Pilot
"No longer is it necessary to train for a job as a flight instructor, or to train for a job flying a turbo-prop. Nor do you have to fly single pilot IFR at night in severe weather with an aircraft of questionable condition. You can now train directly for the Jet Pilot Job you have dreamed of...." Oh BOY!!!
Jet University :: Training Programs :: Express Airline Pilot
"No longer is it necessary to train for a job as a flight instructor, or to train for a job flying a turbo-prop. Nor do you have to fly single pilot IFR at night in severe weather with an aircraft of questionable condition. You can now train directly for the Jet Pilot Job you have dreamed of...." Oh BOY!!!
Ugh....I just watched that....and im ashamed to say I recognize one of the students in the video...hes an FO here at Whisky

Sadly.....I dont think we are ever gonna get back to the way things used to be. There are still too many Kids out there who are willing to do ANYTHING it takes to get into a Airline.
#62
Why?
The unions allowed it to happen. Had ALPA fought to keep the flying in house, life would have been better. But instead they allowed a 2 tier system to develop. No problem, the military guys could jump ahead in line and go direct to mainline, while the CFI's (like me) got to fly 19 seat turboprops. Of course, they never saw the RJ's coming.
We allow it. Why are you flying now for peanuts? Because it's an entry level job. You need the experience to move up. Of course, that's if a job is still there when you get there and will it be the job you thought it would be.
The government allowed it. Big business has fronted governments that have rolled over labor. The RLA has become a joke and the NLRB allowed it to happen. But most pilots still vote the same folks into office.
The public wants it. Go ask 100 passengers about the life of a pilot. You'll still hear the great stories of the 70's and 80's. The fact the job hasn't been like that in years doesn't matter. The story is still good. As long as the fares are cheap and the accident rate is low, who cares.
The unions allowed it to happen. Had ALPA fought to keep the flying in house, life would have been better. But instead they allowed a 2 tier system to develop. No problem, the military guys could jump ahead in line and go direct to mainline, while the CFI's (like me) got to fly 19 seat turboprops. Of course, they never saw the RJ's coming.
We allow it. Why are you flying now for peanuts? Because it's an entry level job. You need the experience to move up. Of course, that's if a job is still there when you get there and will it be the job you thought it would be.
The government allowed it. Big business has fronted governments that have rolled over labor. The RLA has become a joke and the NLRB allowed it to happen. But most pilots still vote the same folks into office.
The public wants it. Go ask 100 passengers about the life of a pilot. You'll still hear the great stories of the 70's and 80's. The fact the job hasn't been like that in years doesn't matter. The story is still good. As long as the fares are cheap and the accident rate is low, who cares.
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
So, the sooner the pilots begin treating their "regional" job as a career the better things will become.
Look, now we even have major's furloughing their staff and subcontracting almost all of their flying to a regional carrier... (Midwest-RAH) The old days of walking across a picket line are gone... now they just come fly your airplanes, or bring their own to replace your's with, and come and fly your routes.... all subcontracted by your airline of course.
Way to go RAH.... the BIGGEST bar lowering in decades.
#64
Its seems nieve to me to think that the media or congress,or the public for that matter would care about our salaries, and we are not the only underpaid overworked members of the working class. The sad truth is that no one besides us give a rats a## about our plight. Anyone who thinks otherwise probably missed a grade somewhere along the line.
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: new guy
Yeah right! Which is why whenever they do rankings of the countries with the highest standards of living, the Scandinavian countries come first. Countries which are socialist. IIMPORTANT don't confust socialist with communist, which is what I think you're doing. I'm sure your comeback will be that these rankings are made by left wing crazies. Typical.......
I'm not confusing anything. When it comes to the economics (call them communisim or socialism), there is strong government intervention (some to the point of actually planning every transaction of the economy). And, you can move to the Scandanavian countries where the personal income tax rate is > 50% (and that is verified: Tax rates around the world - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) You can spread lies about high standard of living, but it is just a lie. They have very little personal choice with their own money/wealth. We are the richest country in the world with the highest standard of living. Our 'poor' have amenities that the wealthy in many 3rd world countries do not have. Our 'poor' have amenities that many average people in industrialized nations do not have. So, I don't know where you get the standard of living statistics, but I do not consider high standard of living = give all my money to the gov't and let them hopefully take care of me. Some people claim we have lower standard of living because we don't have socialized health care, so there are people that don't have health insurance. I would argue the opposite. We have a higher standard of living because we DO NOT have socialized health care. Anyway, move there if you want to experiment with giving away all your money every year, but please leave the USA alone for now so you have a place to come back to when you realize how bad it actually is over there.
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: new guy
Why?
The unions allowed it to happen. Had ALPA fought to keep the flying in house, life would have been better. But instead they allowed a 2 tier system to develop. No problem, the military guys could jump ahead in line and go direct to mainline, while the CFI's (like me) got to fly 19 seat turboprops. Of course, they never saw the RJ's coming.
We allow it. Why are you flying now for peanuts? Because it's an entry level job. You need the experience to move up. Of course, that's if a job is still there when you get there and will it be the job you thought it would be.
The government allowed it. Big business has fronted governments that have rolled over labor. The RLA has become a joke and the NLRB allowed it to happen. But most pilots still vote the same folks into office.
The public wants it. Go ask 100 passengers about the life of a pilot. You'll still hear the great stories of the 70's and 80's. The fact the job hasn't been like that in years doesn't matter. The story is still good. As long as the fares are cheap and the accident rate is low, who cares.
The unions allowed it to happen. Had ALPA fought to keep the flying in house, life would have been better. But instead they allowed a 2 tier system to develop. No problem, the military guys could jump ahead in line and go direct to mainline, while the CFI's (like me) got to fly 19 seat turboprops. Of course, they never saw the RJ's coming.
We allow it. Why are you flying now for peanuts? Because it's an entry level job. You need the experience to move up. Of course, that's if a job is still there when you get there and will it be the job you thought it would be.
The government allowed it. Big business has fronted governments that have rolled over labor. The RLA has become a joke and the NLRB allowed it to happen. But most pilots still vote the same folks into office.
The public wants it. Go ask 100 passengers about the life of a pilot. You'll still hear the great stories of the 70's and 80's. The fact the job hasn't been like that in years doesn't matter. The story is still good. As long as the fares are cheap and the accident rate is low, who cares.
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: new guy
Its seems nieve to me to think that the media or congress,or the public for that matter would care about our salaries, and we are not the only underpaid overworked members of the working class. The sad truth is that no one besides us give a rats a## about our plight. Anyone who thinks otherwise probably missed a grade somewhere along the line.
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Eff Oh Won Fo Fife
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: single pilot cargo, turboprop
On the other hand, if you think this will make things better for us, think twice. If people can't get loans for education and housing, it's going to hurt the economy real bad, and flying/vacations are among of the first things people cut out of their budget when times get hard.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



