Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Why do we accept these wages? >

Why do we accept these wages?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Why do we accept these wages?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2008 | 12:08 PM
  #61  
Flyboy8784's Avatar
Am I Wrong??????????
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: ThE jEtTtTtTtT
Default

Originally Posted by CubCAPTAIN
Speaking of, this is so painful to watch. I love how everytime they say "Regional Jet Pilot" they show a 727 or Md-80.

Jet University :: Training Programs :: Express Airline Pilot

"No longer is it necessary to train for a job as a flight instructor, or to train for a job flying a turbo-prop. Nor do you have to fly single pilot IFR at night in severe weather with an aircraft of questionable condition. You can now train directly for the Jet Pilot Job you have dreamed of...." Oh BOY!!!

Ugh....I just watched that....and im ashamed to say I recognize one of the students in the video...hes an FO here at Whisky

Sadly.....I dont think we are ever gonna get back to the way things used to be. There are still too many Kids out there who are willing to do ANYTHING it takes to get into a Airline.
Reply
Old 09-21-2008 | 12:15 PM
  #62  
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Default

Why?

The unions allowed it to happen. Had ALPA fought to keep the flying in house, life would have been better. But instead they allowed a 2 tier system to develop. No problem, the military guys could jump ahead in line and go direct to mainline, while the CFI's (like me) got to fly 19 seat turboprops. Of course, they never saw the RJ's coming.

We allow it. Why are you flying now for peanuts? Because it's an entry level job. You need the experience to move up. Of course, that's if a job is still there when you get there and will it be the job you thought it would be.

The government allowed it. Big business has fronted governments that have rolled over labor. The RLA has become a joke and the NLRB allowed it to happen. But most pilots still vote the same folks into office.

The public wants it. Go ask 100 passengers about the life of a pilot. You'll still hear the great stories of the 70's and 80's. The fact the job hasn't been like that in years doesn't matter. The story is still good. As long as the fares are cheap and the accident rate is low, who cares.
Reply
Old 09-21-2008 | 12:32 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop
Why?

Why are you flying now for peanuts? Because it's an entry level job. You need the experience to move up.
Those days are long gone. The old days of doing a few years at a regional and moving to a major are history. Management loves to continue this myth since it keeps a steady supply of idiots, I mean new pilots, comming through the door. All of them with the same idea of doing a few years and going to a major. Management thrives off of this dream, because the new pilots don't know the reality, and will work for peanuts, and accept miserable working conditions. More importantly, they will accept new concessions as needed, since they will only be here a few years right?.... what they all have lost sight of is that majors are shrinking, not expanding... the only expanding going on is at regionals, getting scope concessions to aquire larger and larger airplanes.... on the same crappy pay scales, with the same crappy QOL issues. There will not be enough new jobs at majors for anything but a trickle of people to go from regional to major... and all the managements know it. They play off your stupid dreams and use you; period. Regional jobs have become career positions.... they have not attained career payscales and benefit programs yet, but the length of time most will spend at one is nothing short of a career.

So, the sooner the pilots begin treating their "regional" job as a career the better things will become.

Look, now we even have major's furloughing their staff and subcontracting almost all of their flying to a regional carrier... (Midwest-RAH) The old days of walking across a picket line are gone... now they just come fly your airplanes, or bring their own to replace your's with, and come and fly your routes.... all subcontracted by your airline of course.

Way to go RAH.... the BIGGEST bar lowering in decades.
Reply
Old 09-21-2008 | 02:02 PM
  #64  
sigep_nm's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by papacharlie
I dont know but I can see a precious oportunity here to standup and demand better working conditions and make alot of noise by exposing to the media, public and congress the working and salaries conditions pilots are getting pay to fly them around the country.
Its seems nieve to me to think that the media or congress,or the public for that matter would care about our salaries, and we are not the only underpaid overworked members of the working class. The sad truth is that no one besides us give a rats a## about our plight. Anyone who thinks otherwise probably missed a grade somewhere along the line.
Reply
Old 09-21-2008 | 05:01 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: new guy
Default

Originally Posted by Lou Reed
Yeah right! Which is why whenever they do rankings of the countries with the highest standards of living, the Scandinavian countries come first. Countries which are socialist. IIMPORTANT don't confust socialist with communist, which is what I think you're doing. I'm sure your comeback will be that these rankings are made by left wing crazies. Typical.......

I'm not confusing anything. When it comes to the economics (call them communisim or socialism), there is strong government intervention (some to the point of actually planning every transaction of the economy). And, you can move to the Scandanavian countries where the personal income tax rate is > 50% (and that is verified: Tax rates around the world - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) You can spread lies about high standard of living, but it is just a lie. They have very little personal choice with their own money/wealth. We are the richest country in the world with the highest standard of living. Our 'poor' have amenities that the wealthy in many 3rd world countries do not have. Our 'poor' have amenities that many average people in industrialized nations do not have. So, I don't know where you get the standard of living statistics, but I do not consider high standard of living = give all my money to the gov't and let them hopefully take care of me. Some people claim we have lower standard of living because we don't have socialized health care, so there are people that don't have health insurance. I would argue the opposite. We have a higher standard of living because we DO NOT have socialized health care. Anyway, move there if you want to experiment with giving away all your money every year, but please leave the USA alone for now so you have a place to come back to when you realize how bad it actually is over there.
Reply
Old 09-21-2008 | 05:08 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: new guy
Default

Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop
Why?

The unions allowed it to happen. Had ALPA fought to keep the flying in house, life would have been better. But instead they allowed a 2 tier system to develop. No problem, the military guys could jump ahead in line and go direct to mainline, while the CFI's (like me) got to fly 19 seat turboprops. Of course, they never saw the RJ's coming.

We allow it. Why are you flying now for peanuts? Because it's an entry level job. You need the experience to move up. Of course, that's if a job is still there when you get there and will it be the job you thought it would be.

The government allowed it. Big business has fronted governments that have rolled over labor. The RLA has become a joke and the NLRB allowed it to happen. But most pilots still vote the same folks into office.

The public wants it. Go ask 100 passengers about the life of a pilot. You'll still hear the great stories of the 70's and 80's. The fact the job hasn't been like that in years doesn't matter. The story is still good. As long as the fares are cheap and the accident rate is low, who cares.
So, you are basically saying that government intervention has caused the problems with labor because the government is regulating the ability of labor to affect the market forces by working/not working. Your solution is that we need more regulation to overcome the regulation that is already screwing up the process. I just hope that maybe you (and many others) will see that your arguements for regulation are ignorant. The candidate in your signature, btw, would love to regulate all industry and shift to a more socialized economy. Just be careful what you ask for.
Reply
Old 09-21-2008 | 05:13 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: new guy
Default

Originally Posted by sigep_nm
Its seems nieve to me to think that the media or congress,or the public for that matter would care about our salaries, and we are not the only underpaid overworked members of the working class. The sad truth is that no one besides us give a rats a## about our plight. Anyone who thinks otherwise probably missed a grade somewhere along the line.
How can you claim that you are underpaid? What pay do you deserve? You deserve the exact amount that the airline can hire people to do your job. Right now, they could actually lower wages and benefits at your airline, and I would bet they would keep getting plenty of 'qualified' applicants. You don't deserve anything. You have the right to work wherever will hire you. If you do not agree with how much pilots are being paid, you are welcome to work for a different industry. Stop with the F'ing Marxism on here. We are a free country. Wages and prices are set by the market. The market shows that pilots will work for shi**y wages.
Reply
Old 09-21-2008 | 07:22 PM
  #68  
poor pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Default

Amen thats the main problem untill the lowest paying airlines go to the resume inbox and it says ZERO "you have no new suckers" they will continue to pay crap.
Reply
Old 09-22-2008 | 05:46 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Eff Oh Won Fo Fife
Default

Originally Posted by poor pilot
Amen thats the main problem untill the lowest paying airlines go to the resume inbox and it says ZERO "you have no new suckers" they will continue to pay crap.
To quote an certain airline CEO:
"As long as I have a stack of resumes on my desk, pilots are overpaid."
Reply
Old 09-22-2008 | 06:52 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
Today, all one needs to do is sign for a $40,000 (or more) loan. As we have seen lately, banks a THRILLED to loan you all that money..... after all, one day you will make $250,000 per year.
I think Key Bank and Sallie Mae realized their errors before this past month, but it was too late. With enough people defaulting on loans, and government reform to prevent bailouts for high risk actitivites, I'm thinking it's going to be real hard to get that "$40K loan" (BTW, I'd bet its double that now days, I know guys who spent over $100K).

On the other hand, if you think this will make things better for us, think twice. If people can't get loans for education and housing, it's going to hurt the economy real bad, and flying/vacations are among of the first things people cut out of their budget when times get hard.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
planediveguy
Regional
99
09-23-2008 06:32 AM
captscott26
GoJet
244
08-31-2008 03:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices