Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

skywest hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2009 | 02:38 PM
  #41  
Koolaidman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SKYW CRJ FO
Default

I'll fly 75 or less to keep guys off the street, it's a shame you can't cut back enough to do the same. How do you plan on retiring if you need an extra $200 a month? Or is that your retirement money?

Anyways, to answer Tony's comments. There was an FO in my new hire class who shouldn't have made it through new hire class. They got him on IOE during upgrade after being on the airplane for 1.5 years. Some people can't cut it. Just like everyone can't be a doctor, not everyone can fly airplanes to an airline standard.

So what is the deal with the website? Someone on our company forums mentioned that nothing has changed with our website and the fact we are hiring. He said they just re-posted it for 2009. I thought we pulled that off of the website once people were put in the pool. Can anyone clarify one way or the other?
Old 01-04-2009 | 03:45 PM
  #42  
paxhauler85's Avatar
*********
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
Having folks on the street when at least there is a distant possibility that SkW may be able to pick up flying that Mesa may not be able to provide, and that UAL has asked SkW to be ready for that possibility.
The only way SKW will get Mesa flying is if we go TU. We just put out a standing bid that downgraded 50 CA's and moved around another 100 F/O's. This means were fat for the flying we have, and are cutting costs.

BK would result in SKW, ASA RAH, and the others fighting it out to see who can do our old flying for the lowest price.
Old 01-04-2009 | 03:59 PM
  #43  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by paxhauler85
The only way SKW will get Mesa flying is if we go TU.

TU.... or any other way the airline can find to break the contract (aka Delta).


BK would result in SKW, ASA RAH, and the others fighting it out to see who can do our old flying for the lowest price.

Of course. I didn't suggest SkW would have exclusivity, but they most definitely would have a piece of the pie.
Old 01-04-2009 | 04:10 PM
  #44  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by Koolaidman
There was an FO in my new hire class who shouldn't have made it through new hire class. They got him on IOE during upgrade after being on the airplane for 1.5 years.

What's the point? If he "shouldn't have made it", then why did he 1.5 years ago? What if he had never upgraded? Then he'd be "unworthy" for 20 years? What if he tranistioned to another airframe, and failed? He goes back to his previous "unworthy" seat. If you're suggesting that SkW just passes everybody through new hire, you're sadly mistaken.

And based on your suggestion, since I failed upgrade, I should just pack my flying bags and find a new career. Like you said, not everybody is cut out for this job.


So what is the deal with the website? Someone on our company forums mentioned that nothing has changed with our website and the fact we are hiring. He said they just re-posted it for 2009. I thought we pulled that off of the website once people were put in the pool. Can anyone clarify one way or the other?
https://www.ultirecruit.com/sky1000/.../ListJobs.aspx
Old 01-04-2009 | 08:38 PM
  #45  
paxhauler85's Avatar
*********
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
TU.... or any other way the airline can find to break the contract (aka Delta).
That's been an easy and cheap endeavor for them, so I understand why it would be attractive to a struggling United and USAirways.
Old 01-04-2009 | 09:18 PM
  #46  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by paxhauler85
That's been an easy and cheap endeavor for them, so I understand why it would be attractive to a struggling United and USAirways.
I wouldn't bet money on UA/US following DL's example, only saying it's certainly on the table.

I would bet the contract would be dropped in BK.
Old 01-04-2009 | 10:55 PM
  #47  
Seatownflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Pilot sleeping.
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
If line credit vaules go below 80 hours a month then they need to furlough.
B.B. from sapa forums?

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
and the policy manual says that lineholders can expect 87 hours per month.
haha. thats funny. relying on the policy manual? now that you've posted this they'll probably change it by tomorrow.
Old 01-04-2009 | 11:16 PM
  #48  
reelbigchair's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Seatownflyer
B.B. from sapa forums?



haha. thats funny. relying on the policy manual? now that you've posted this they'll probably change it by tomorrow.
#1 I always thought slappy was a new F/O based on his apparent inexperience and arrogance, but I'm noticing the similarities as well.

#2 As I point out to anyone that I talk to about it. We are guaranteed 75, no more, no less. I'm so sick of hearing this 87 crap. (Also I'm a line holder in no danger of getting furloughed, and would technically benefit from higher credit lines. I'm very happily taking my 80 hour line to save us from sending guys to the street)
Old 01-05-2009 | 07:27 AM
  #49  
duvie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: WB Bunkie
Default

[QUOTE=TonyWilliams;530722]What's the point? If he "shouldn't have made it", then why did he 1.5 years ago? What if he had never upgraded? Then he'd be "unworthy" for 20 years? What if he tranistioned to another airframe, and failed? He goes back to his previous "unworthy" seat. If you're suggesting that SkW just passes everybody through new hire, you're sadly mistaken.

And based on your suggestion, since I failed upgrade, I should just pack my flying bags and find a new career. Like you said, not everybody is cut out for this job.

Buddy, I know its frustrating, but you knew the risk going into upgrade in an airplane you hadn't flown before. I'm not saying I agree with the policy, but you can't blame somebody else when you knew the rules going in. I've got my bid in for EMB CA as a CRJ only FO. It does make me a little nervous, but its a risk I'd like to take for career progression. Good luck
Old 01-05-2009 | 08:37 AM
  #50  
seattlepilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Default

I am sorry SkyWest's up or out policy is ridiculous. Everyone thinks that it's a great airline but i have never felt this small by a person in training dept. and a certain sim instructor who uses more cuss words than aviation words while he is instructing.
I am sorry, if they are professional they should get rid of that person (and I am using this word lightly) period. . This guy has and will impact the livelyhood of families, careers of pilots.
I loved the people in SkyWest when i was there, except a training guy who picked on my religion , name constantly (he suggested that i should get an American name if i am flying in America now. I have been living in this country for 15 years) and this check airman..

What added insult to the injury was a certian BroFO (now CRJ FO) showing his genitelia to his classmates in the class but he is still on the property.. Skywest definately takes care of his own..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jaded
Regional
29
03-09-2009 03:20 PM
Waldo11
Regional
79
03-09-2009 03:18 PM
find a way
Regional
93
03-09-2009 03:10 PM
BHopper88
Regional
13
08-04-2008 09:18 AM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
0
03-08-2005 04:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices