Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
why are people so caught up on hours? >

why are people so caught up on hours?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

why are people so caught up on hours?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2009 | 10:36 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Default

As a low time civilian applicant (1100hrs) at a regional, my interviewer was VERY interested in my military background, even though it was not aviation oriented. He was sharp enough to know that it demonstrated the ability to assimilate large amounts of technical info in a compressed, stressful period of time, which is exactly what 121 training is. I am convinced that it was a major factor in me getting the job, since my flying experience (CFI) was unremarkable.
Reply
Old 02-04-2009 | 10:45 AM
  #22  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,874
Likes: 671
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by N6724G
I guess what I am saying is it took me 12 years to accumulate 900 hours. I have flown nothing but general aviation airplanes. Didnt go to a big fancy flight program. Did it all at a loacl FBO and I currently teach at a local flight school. I dont think I am that great of a pilto. I think the guy that has 300 hours that went to a sturctured flight school in six months is probably more proficient that I am. He flies everyday whereas I may get 100 hours in a year. Thats what I mean by hours does not always equal proficiency.
Once you meet the minimums, you will be given appropriate consideration at your interview for your life experience and long-term involvement in aviation. Personally, I would hire you over a puppy-mill grad who just had to show up and do what he was told.
Reply
Old 02-04-2009 | 11:22 AM
  #23  
Helperto EL's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default Well said

Experience and maturtiy have a lot to do with all the factors. Recency of experience really can make a difference. I was in the Military for 20 years in a non flying position and I think this helped me get a job. I did however have a lot of time and was a flight instructor. I flew some charter but mostly instruction. I will tell everyone that airline training is no joke and it was a transition for me but the experience I received over the years was invaluable.
Reply
Old 02-04-2009 | 12:33 PM
  #24  
ebl14's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 926
Likes: 68
From: 73N
Default

Hours = Expierence
Recency of hours + type of flying = Proficiency

Expierence + Proficiency = a qualified applicant

Someone who is proficient is much more likely to have no problems getting through training, and someone with good expierence makes a good Captain and decision-maker. Its a proven equation and won't change any time soon for the better jobs.
Reply
Old 02-04-2009 | 12:46 PM
  #25  
winglet's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Default Bag Full of Luck

Here's an old saying worth repeating...

"You start with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the bag of experience before you empty the bag of luck."

Winglet
Reply
Old 02-04-2009 | 12:48 PM
  #26  
Lowlevel's Avatar
What's A Weekend?
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
From: Big...So Big
Default

Originally Posted by N6724G
I guess what I am saying is it took me 12 years to accumulate 900 hours. I have flown nothing but general aviation airplanes. Didnt go to a big fancy flight program. Did it all at a loacl FBO and I currently teach at a local flight school. I dont think I am that great of a pilto. I think the guy that has 300 hours that went to a sturctured flight school in six months is probably more proficient that I am. He flies everyday whereas I may get 100 hours in a year. Thats what I mean by hours does not always equal proficiency.
Airlines set their minimum hours for applicants to apply. That is not to say that when you interview you will get the job. Part of an airline interview is with a pilot at that airline. The interviewer will look at your log book and evaluate not only total time, but multi time, night time, IFR time, etc.. If you flew 900 hours with only the minimum IFR for the rating, they will see that. Most airlines usually like to see that you are currently flying, and better yet, flying as a commercial pilot (not only flying your own plane around).
When I was interviewed, the interviewer noticed the Part 135 cargo flying (lots of IFR at night) and many hours as PIC in single engine (flying traffic reporting in all sorts of weather) and PIC multi-engine flying cargo. It was not the total time that they looked at, but it is the total time that gets you invited for an interview.
Reply
Old 02-04-2009 | 02:02 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Default

High time is impressive if 1. Your skills and judgment correlate with your time, and 2. You've demonstrated your ability to keep your record clean.
Reply
Old 02-24-2009 | 11:42 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Default

I didn't want to start a new thread so I'll post this here.

Captain Sullenberger was testifying to the board on the accident and during the testimony he explained his 40% pay cut, his loss of a pension, and the second job he has to make ends meet. He also explained that if the trend continues more experienced pilots will leave and much, much less experienced pilots will take over creating a safety of flight issue. Here is a video clip of it from Yahoo: Yahoo!
hxxp://www.yahoo.com/s/1034991

He's a hell of guy!
Reply
Old 02-24-2009 | 01:43 PM
  #29  
el jefe's Avatar
Tier 3 Candidate
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Canadair Gosh
Default

Quality > Quantity

Personality/Attitude > everything else
Reply
Old 02-24-2009 | 02:56 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by el jefe
Quality > Quantity

Personality/Attitude > everything else
HAHA!!!

This story made national news tonight on NBC with Brian Williams. This was a great opportunity for an industry hero to open the eyes of the world and congress as to what is happening to our industry. Will anything come out of this? I hope! Anything positive would be better than nothing!

Any thoughts from the rest of the peanut gallery?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
ortrucker39
Aviation Law
10
12-29-2008 06:07 PM
N6724G
Regional
96
12-14-2008 04:48 AM
MrBigAir
Aviation Law
21
11-06-2008 08:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices