Comair/Mesaba Merged Seniority List.
#12
Here is my opinion,
In the event of a merger between these 2 companies, the furloughed guys will be "stapled to the bottom", I'm willing to let an attorney pour over our contract -Comair- to see if there are grounds for a class action lawsuit on the basis there will be more junior people at than those furloughed. I may be wrong, but that strikes me as an unfair labor practice amongst other things, if the more junior people are allowed to stay while some folks are on furlough. I understand there are circumstances where this has happened before, however I believe not one of those times was ever challenged in court -to my knowledge-. And if there's something a lawyer likes more than challenge an unprecedented "law", and make money while at it, I don't know what it is.
For you attorneys out there, please tell me what's wrong with this. Keep in mind, this is just a progressing thought and happens to be my stern opinion.
Thanks.
In the event of a merger between these 2 companies, the furloughed guys will be "stapled to the bottom", I'm willing to let an attorney pour over our contract -Comair- to see if there are grounds for a class action lawsuit on the basis there will be more junior people at than those furloughed. I may be wrong, but that strikes me as an unfair labor practice amongst other things, if the more junior people are allowed to stay while some folks are on furlough. I understand there are circumstances where this has happened before, however I believe not one of those times was ever challenged in court -to my knowledge-. And if there's something a lawyer likes more than challenge an unprecedented "law", and make money while at it, I don't know what it is.
For you attorneys out there, please tell me what's wrong with this. Keep in mind, this is just a progressing thought and happens to be my stern opinion.
Thanks.
#13
I'm a recovering lawyer, but not a labor lawyer and have little practical knowledge of union/management practices.....nonetheless my "legal" instincts say that the union(s) would have to agree to any list integration deal and that if they agree the members are stuck with the terms of the deal.
I suspect a suit against ALPA concerning their conflicts in representing mainline and regionals would be more fertile area for litigation.
I suspect a suit against ALPA concerning their conflicts in representing mainline and regionals would be more fertile area for litigation.
#14
I'm a recovering lawyer, but not a labor lawyer and have little practical knowledge of union/management practices.....nonetheless my "legal" instincts say that the union(s) would have to agree to any list integration deal and that if they agree the members are stuck with the terms of the deal.
I suspect a suit against ALPA concerning their conflicts in representing mainline and regionals would be more fertile area for litigation.
I suspect a suit against ALPA concerning their conflicts in representing mainline and regionals would be more fertile area for litigation.
900 Captains at Mesaba would not be affected with fence restrictions on the more senior Comair group and upgrades would have fences as well.
#15
Who scrooing whom depends on how they integrate the lists.
If they go straight ratio, the Comair guys get scrood. A 8th year Comair FO (number 600) will just love doing walkarounds for his 3rd year Mesaba Captain (also number 600). A 7th year Mesaba Captain bumps a 15-year Comair Captain back on reserve, that kind of thing.
If they do straight DOH, the Mesaba guys get scrood. A senior Mesaba FO hired in 2007 becomes very junior as 600 Comair FOs are added to the list above him. A 4th-year Mesaba Captain never gets off reserve because 500 of those 600 Comair FOs (who are senior to him) will upgrade and keep him where he is.
So some blend of the two methods would have to be found.
I'm sure ALPA will get right on that...
If they go straight ratio, the Comair guys get scrood. A 8th year Comair FO (number 600) will just love doing walkarounds for his 3rd year Mesaba Captain (also number 600). A 7th year Mesaba Captain bumps a 15-year Comair Captain back on reserve, that kind of thing.
If they do straight DOH, the Mesaba guys get scrood. A senior Mesaba FO hired in 2007 becomes very junior as 600 Comair FOs are added to the list above him. A 4th-year Mesaba Captain never gets off reserve because 500 of those 600 Comair FOs (who are senior to him) will upgrade and keep him where he is.
So some blend of the two methods would have to be found.
I'm sure ALPA will get right on that...


Which is precisely why I preach try to do your best and if your lucky youll be a happy airline pilot, at this level boys and girls your skills and work ethic mean nothing.,..LUCK does..but i digress
#16
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
The Mesaba seniority list is already a complete mess in itself. I doubt management could deal with a merger between comair and XJ. For instance, I'm an Aug 05 hire and DTW 900 CA. All 200 captains are senior to me, as well as several hundred Saab captains. If you combine the two list by any means, ratio or DOH, the senior aircraft will be the 200 and not the 700 or 900. Since XJ has blended rates for FO's, the 900 FO's are the most junior FO's. So the most senior FO position would also be the 200. So, if DAL decides to park any 200's, the entire seniority list is displaced, with the exception of the top 50 only.
#17
The Mesaba seniority list is already a complete mess in itself. I doubt management could deal with a merger between comair and XJ. For instance, I'm an Aug 05 hire and DTW 900 CA. All 200 captains are senior to me, as well as several hundred Saab captains. If you combine the two list by any means, ratio or DOH, the senior aircraft will be the 200 and not the 700 or 900. Since XJ has blended rates for FO's, the 900 FO's are the most junior FO's. So the most senior FO position would also be the 200. So, if DAL decides to park any 200's, the entire seniority list is displaced, with the exception of the top 50 only.
#18
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
So I guess the point is, it's better to just shut down XJ or CA and distribute the planes among the other regionals, than it would be to merger the companies. However, I think that's unlikely the case, so in my opinion, the status quo will continue.
Last edited by Mesabah; 02-19-2009 at 07:01 AM.
#19
It's probably just better to operate Compass, Mesaba and Comair as separate entities. Since we as labor, do not make up the entire cost of the operation a lot of efficiencies can be gained by streamlining the back of the house functions for DCI.
To start... get rid of that monstrous headquarters building Comair has at CVG! Comair certainly doesn't have to be headquartered in CVG to have a base there. There is a lot of real estate in MSP as DL and NWA merge the operations, there would be plenty of room for XJ, CP and OH to be headquartered in MSP. It makes no sense to pay for facilities that are redundant, which includes the XJ Go.
All they have to do is join forces for everything that they can and then keep separate what they have to maintain separate certificates. There can be one massive SOC with separate Comair, Mesaba and Compass areas. One massive GO, with separate areas for each airline for the functions that must remain separate. They can basically stop short of merging the 3 wholly owned carriers and gain tons of efficiency, cut costs still keep us separate for the sake of mgmt flexibility (whipsaw).
To start... get rid of that monstrous headquarters building Comair has at CVG! Comair certainly doesn't have to be headquartered in CVG to have a base there. There is a lot of real estate in MSP as DL and NWA merge the operations, there would be plenty of room for XJ, CP and OH to be headquartered in MSP. It makes no sense to pay for facilities that are redundant, which includes the XJ Go.
All they have to do is join forces for everything that they can and then keep separate what they have to maintain separate certificates. There can be one massive SOC with separate Comair, Mesaba and Compass areas. One massive GO, with separate areas for each airline for the functions that must remain separate. They can basically stop short of merging the 3 wholly owned carriers and gain tons of efficiency, cut costs still keep us separate for the sake of mgmt flexibility (whipsaw).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




