Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SOP type Non-precision approach question >

SOP type Non-precision approach question


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SOP type Non-precision approach question

Old 02-21-2009 | 09:18 AM
  #11  
pilot772's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: UAL Guppy CA
Default

On an ILS PF calls minimums and PM calls, "runway in sight, approach lights in sight, or Missed approach." On NP approaches we calculate a VDP so it happens a little less quick. The pilot flying can call out the VDP point, If the runway environment is not insight at the VDP than a missed approach is imminent. We continue to fly or even start climbing straight in until the published missed approach point than execute the missed approach.
Reply
Old 02-21-2009 | 10:38 AM
  #12  
HSLD's Avatar
APC co-founder
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,853
Likes: 0
From: B777
Default

Originally Posted by marco
...the Pilot Monitoring calls out "Minimums" to which the Pilot Flying responds with either "Landing, Continuing or Go-Around." Upon reaching the Missed Approach Point the Pilot Monitoring calls out "Missed Approach/No Runway." The Pilot Flying responds with "Go-Around."
That's what we do too - PNF calls minimums, PF says landing or going around. We do it the same way for all approaches to avoid confusion, although there are a few more callouts on Cat II/III. We call DH, MDA, or AH as appropriate, otherwise all approaches are pretty much the same.

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Somehow I've mananged to do both at the same time

USMCFLYR
Oh the humanity!
Reply
Old 02-21-2009 | 01:32 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 9
Default

LoL yeah Koolaidman...I wouldn't get too worked up about it We haven't had planes fall out of the sky recently simply because PNF peaked inside for a second or two (or vice-versa, of course)!

But your'e right...It's silly. There are so many contradictions in our SOP it makes you wonder if those writing this stuff up have ever been on an airplane themselves!
Reply
Old 02-21-2009 | 08:27 PM
  #14  
Koolaidman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SKYW CRJ FO
Default

It's make sense to me to have th PNF looking outside for the runway while the FP stays inside and would be the one who calls "minimums". Very interesting how every airline is different. Again, thanks for all of the input.
Reply
Old 02-21-2009 | 08:44 PM
  #15  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Oh the humanity!
It's not humanity HSLD - it is called a HUD

So if the PF is concentrating on the instruments (and heads down in the cockpit) and the PNF is looking outside for visual cues - - is it tough for the PF to transition from inside the cockpit to the outside visuals cues if the weather is such that it might be at minimums? I mean if the weather is so bad that you're waiting for that last second before going missed to see the airport environment, then it would seem to be a tough transition for the PF.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 02-22-2009 | 12:14 AM
  #16  
forumname's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: I am the Stig
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Somehow I've mananged to do both at the same time

USMCFLYR
Depending on your PNF in a multi crew airplane, you can do that in an airliner as well .

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
So if the PF is concentrating on the instruments (and heads down in the cockpit) and the PNF is looking outside for visual cues - - is it tough for the PF to transition from inside the cockpit to the outside visuals cues if the weather is such that it might be at minimums? I mean if the weather is so bad that you're waiting for that last second before going missed to see the airport environment, then it would seem to be a tough transition for the PF.

USMCFLYR
On a non precision and it's right at mins, it seems as if the hardest thing for the PF is to keep descending once the environment is in sight and you are right at the published VDP, or your calculated VDP right when you see it. Very common to see it but not start coming down, putting the aircraft high and the likely possibility of de-stablizing the approach. Plenty of bent metal out there from this situation.

On a CAT I ILS the transition doesn't seem to dramatic. Especially if there is minimal crab angle, etc.

My airline is only approved for CATII, and I've only done a hand full of them. Even though its the CA looking outside as well as the one thats going to put it on the ground, yes, it can happen quick and be tough to transition.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
caboarder2001
Aviation Law
28
03-30-2009 03:13 PM
dundem
Cargo
26
09-14-2008 09:14 AM
Bryan1726
Corporate
3
08-27-2008 09:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices